Chesterlestreet
Man of the crowd
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
- Messages
- 19,791
@Enigma_87 During the bad run under Ole we've looked as disjointed and, well, un-drilled as we did under Mourinho. We've also lacked intensity to a great extent, something we also lacked under Mourinho except in flashes. Initially, when Ole was still caretaker, we did look more cohesive (against fairly poor opposition, granted, but still) - and we definitely played with (much) more intensity.
Isn't it conceivable that the team have reverted to a "default" mode, one that does not reflect how Ole wants us to play? I mean, this is pretty much what he has implied himself. I don't wildly disagree with most of your conclusions above, but if what you're analyzing is the "default" mode, you're ultimately looking at Mourinho's (or nobody's, a fecking mishmash) team, not Ole's.
Even if I'm right, it's obviously possible to criticize his decision to revert to a default that's plain shit, or his possible inability to stop a less voluntary slide back to said default, but that's nevertheless different than having tried to implement a dreadful system which is his by choice/preference.
It's become fashionable to mock the idea of giving managers a modicum of time to put their stamp on a team. I don't quite see what's so wrong with it myself. Do we, as you said above, keep backing him blindly until it all goes to hell (again)? No. If what I call the "default" mode is still there next season (it should be gone by the first pre-season match, actually), you won't catch me defending him.
Isn't it conceivable that the team have reverted to a "default" mode, one that does not reflect how Ole wants us to play? I mean, this is pretty much what he has implied himself. I don't wildly disagree with most of your conclusions above, but if what you're analyzing is the "default" mode, you're ultimately looking at Mourinho's (or nobody's, a fecking mishmash) team, not Ole's.
Even if I'm right, it's obviously possible to criticize his decision to revert to a default that's plain shit, or his possible inability to stop a less voluntary slide back to said default, but that's nevertheless different than having tried to implement a dreadful system which is his by choice/preference.
It's become fashionable to mock the idea of giving managers a modicum of time to put their stamp on a team. I don't quite see what's so wrong with it myself. Do we, as you said above, keep backing him blindly until it all goes to hell (again)? No. If what I call the "default" mode is still there next season (it should be gone by the first pre-season match, actually), you won't catch me defending him.