clarkydaz
Full Member
He has been talking about slow starts longer than i can remember now. Nothing changesThe players didn't seem to be ready for the game. Solskjaer and the coaching staff will have to address these slow starts.
He has been talking about slow starts longer than i can remember now. Nothing changesThe players didn't seem to be ready for the game. Solskjaer and the coaching staff will have to address these slow starts.
Forget the results. Have the performances and style of play improved in the last three years?
If your answer is yes, you're a liar.
We haven't become too predictable. Weve been predictable since Ole signed his first contract bar 5 or 6 games . Thats the problem many of us have since he's been here. He's no clue how to mix it up, no clue how to respond when an opposing manager changes his tactics during a game, his in game management and subs at times is baffling and today wasn't a one off, far from it. We've played like this plenty of times but came away with results which has masked just how naive he is in the tactics department.I’m “Ole In” and think the hysterical reaction as usual is well over the top. However- he needs to stop these streaks of bad form we go on and he also needs to find a way to mix it up considerably. We’ve become too predictable
Coming to the realisation yet? As mentioned earlier, same stuff,different year.Haha knee jerk galore here. It is the second game of the season. If Ole fails to mount a serious title challenge this season then it is time we bid him farewell.
We need a Kante type of player and Fred isn't a long term solution nor is MCT.
This feels a lot like last season, when there was talk that all would depend on him getting a "real" CB and an RW. I agree, we lack Quality in that area of the squad but when will that cycle stop? Will it stop? Be honest, don't you think the year after the DM it could be that we need an actual striker? A replacement for Pogba? A backup for AWB? A backup for the striker, the DM, the RW ...?Swings and roundabouts, would you be happy with a couple finals and maybe we win 1 and come away with nothing the next two seasons?
It all depends where we finish in the league too, it's not as simplistic as that. I'd take 2, 2nd place finishes over 2 4th and 5th finishes. I mean not finishing 1st is not finishing 1st you can't change that. But if we were challenging for the title and pushing teams all the way, I'd be happy to give him more time.
All depends if he can get a DM and 'officially' start to play the football he wants. I believe there is a system there but not all the players can play it. He would need to find a system that suits the players he has now, rather than shoe-horning a system into players that simply cannot play it. It seems as though, for me, those players is Fred/McTominay. (See a criticism! haha! More so Fred than McT) If we were to get a Rice type of player and a RB in the same ilk of Shaw I believe we'd start to play much better football. Though we do play some beautiful football at times (yes I know it needs to be more often and not in bursts). See I can criticise.
Only watched the first half. Very very surprised we didn’t win this one. What happened? The first half was United against a championship team.
The downside of having had Fergie is that we seem desperate to find another Fergie and are willing to stretch every manager's tenure until it violently breaks in the hope that this one will somehow end up staying for almost three decades and win everything many times over.
Sure you watched us? It wasn't the greatest of games but we were not as bad as some make it look like. Individually everybody was a t least solid. Villa though was great, great pressing and real intent in their attacks. We simply didn't create anything of note against them. Oles potential ways to influence were hampered due to forced subs because of injuries to Shaw and Maguire. We conceded a set piece and didn't make use of a penalty later on. It was a deserved loss (I think it would have been after 1st 45minutes as well).Only watched the first half. Very very surprised we didn’t win this one. What happened? The first half was United against a championship team.
You keep out of this.
You aren't the first and you will not be the last.I waited for hours to make that joke, but you’re right.
From ManUtd app:
Ole : "We started the game well, aggressive, good on transitions, going forward quickly. The decision making, the execution in the final third, that costs us today. And decision making on VAR has cost us again, unfortunately. I've go to say it, it's offside, the goal. As Hause is heading it, Watkins is actually touching David, so he's impeding him".
Not worried about the VAR comment, it looked offside to me as well. What really concerns me is the first sentence. No mention on passing and keeping the ball better. Almost looks like that was how we wanted us to play. No control in midfield. When it works it's a joy to watch but when it doesn't it put the team on a massive risk. Can't see this sort of tactic winning big trophies.
Ole has won trophies at 33% of the clubs he has managed. He has also won a trophy in a higher percentage of seasons he has has managed than klopp. Maybe.
That really worries me. I mean, of course in hindsight that sort of thing effects us. But the issue isn't that we are unlucky with the refs, it is that time and time again we find ourselves in situations where stuff like that, bad luck or coincidences depending on your philosophical stance, decides over win and failures. I am sorry, but I have absolutely zero compassion with it. Actually I am angry reading that. As if the criticism is about him getting this one individual result - it isn't.From ManUtd app:
Ole : "We started the game well, aggressive, good on transitions, going forward quickly. The decision making, the execution in the final third, that costs us today. And decision making on VAR has cost us again, unfortunately. I've go to say it, it's offside, the goal. As Hause is heading it, Watkins is actually touching David, so he's impeding him".
Not worried about the VAR comment, it looked offside to me as well. What really concerns me is the first sentence. No mention on passing and keeping the ball better. Almost looks like that was how we wanted us to play. No control in midfield. When it works it's a joy to watch but when it doesn't it put the team on a massive risk. Can't see this sort of tactic winning big trophies.
That’s not modern football. The most successful clubs all change managers fairly regularly.I'm pretty sure half of our fanbase dreams of that too.
Maybe even the club.
It's lunacy. Complete lunacy.
Refusing to take any blame as always.From ManUtd app:
Ole : "We started the game well, aggressive, good on transitions, going forward quickly. The decision making, the execution in the final third, that costs us today. And decision making on VAR has cost us again, unfortunately. I've go to say it, it's offside, the goal. As Hause is heading it, Watkins is actually touching David, so he's impeding him".
Not worried about the VAR comment, it looked offside to me as well. What really concerns me is the first sentence. No mention on passing and keeping the ball better. Almost looks like that was how we wanted us to play. No control in midfield. When it works it's a joy to watch but when it doesn't it put the team on a massive risk. Can't see this sort of tactic winning big trophies.
Well It was very much a tongue in cheek post but I have to love how winning trophies in a European league means nothing but him not winning trophies at fecking Cardiff means something. You silly silly man.You actually brought Molde to the table, you automatically lose the debate. I won a cup when I was 12, it was not for being the best team but rewarded for fair play. Does that make me more successful than Harry Kane? What Ole Solskjær did at Molde does not count for shit, it is not the same sport whatsoever. The Norwegian league is utterly crap and any team with some investment like Molde had could to from oblivion to contention. See Bodø/Glimt, some smart investments and strategies and suddenly won the league. Please.
Coming to the realisation yet? As mentioned earlier, same stuff,different year.
McFred at home to villa. Joke.
Knee jerk galore here mateThe Villa game answered my initial queries. It’s now becoming worryingly evident Ole needs to leave.
I propose a new manager every 2 years. Let's just chuck our lot in with Chelsea and City. That's modern football so let's embrace it. Maybe we can all wear the same jerseys.That’s not modern football. The most successful clubs all change managers fairly regularly.
Strong focus on youth? Hm, really? But ok.We have a fantastic squad of players with a strong focus on youth and attacking football. That’s a million miles ahead of where we were when he took over.
I don't think our players suit a klopp style.Klopp would win the league comfortably with this United squad. It's all on Ole and his coaches, we need to strop throwing our players under the bus.
City & Chelsea win regular trophies. You don’t want to be like that?I propose a new manager every 2 years. Let's just chuck our lot in with Chelsea and City. That's modern football so let's embrace it. Maybe we can all wear the same jerseys.
What exactly doesn't suit his style? Except AWB i guessI don't think our players suit a klopp style.
I propose a new manager every 2 years. Let's just chuck our lot in with Chelsea and City. That's modern football so let's embrace it. Maybe we can all wear the same jerseys.
You lose stability . As i learned here, when you sack manager, you lose club's stability. And you need to lose at least another 4 years for rebuilding . Because new manager must get his squad.City & Chelsea win regular trophies. You don’t want to be like that?
And 500 million. You can’t forget that part. 4 years & 500 million.You lose stability . As i learned here, when you sack manager, you lose club's stability. And you need to lose at least another 4 years for rebuilding . Because new manager must get his squad.
I made a thread about all those myths.
Most annoying question is; if not Ole, who? Who??!!And 500 million. You can’t forget that part. 4 years & 500 million.
That’s not modern football. The most successful clubs all change managers fairly regularly.
Most annoying question is; if not Ole, who? Who??!!
Klopp plays high risk high reward, our defence has given our opponents big chances at the slightest exposure.What exactly doesn't suit his style? Except AWB i guess
Stop insulting everyone’s intelligence.Or maybe Klopp is a shit manager, whose side couldn't win a relatively simple game despite having spent all this money?
ThisThe frustrating thing is that all Ole needs to do is to hire some top classes coaches and let them work on the team. He doesn't have to do it ALL himself. Get a Meulensteen, Quieroz or whoever, to fill in the deficiencies in his own coaching and give him the confidence to try different formations in games. Is Eric Ramsay the one? I feel again we are taking a punt on a young, relatively unproven coach instead of someone who's been part of title winning teams.
His man-management and squad building is great, and most importantly he understands the club ethos. I think he's actually a good manager, but a not-so good coach. So, just hire better, more experienced coaches to work for him!
Refusing to take any blame as always.
More bad faith argument drivel. Nobody is saying change managers for the fun of it.I propose a new manager every 2 years. Let's just chuck our lot in with Chelsea and City. That's modern football so let's embrace it. Maybe we can all wear the same jerseys.