The volume of repetition this arguement gets along with “we finished second last season and got to a final so we must be well coached” is really silly to me. It’s as if no one had a telly and we just look at stats on livescore after each game and say...we must be good!
We all have eyes. I presume we all watched every game last season and this season. Name me games in that period which we played well...you know...where afterward you said...Jesus we were good today. We have played 66 times I think. I can count Leeds twice, Southampton, once against City, 3-2 against pool in the FA Cup, RB and PSG in the CL and Sociadad and Roma in the EL. That’s 9 good/top performances for me - out of 66.
I remember watching those other 57 matches and not feeling like I’d watched good performances over all. So why would I then just look at the possession stats, shots on goal, goals scored and convince my own eyes they were wrong as the stats say we must be a good football team? I saw the matches so I don’t need Contextless metrics to correct my opinions.
I love Utd, I love Ole, I don’t like how we play football most of the time. It’s slow, we often lack intensity and we ride our luck. I happen to believe that could be corrected by better coaching in the same way we have tried to correct our set piece play( early days but looking better).
just cause someone doesn’t like how we have been playing doesn’t make them a glory hunter, fair weather, tactical bullshitter, coaching gimp, internet fan or whatever other names you lads sling at them around here.