- Joined
- Oct 6, 2019
- Messages
- 187
I guess it’s up to discussion. One can believe Ole can consistently go toe-to-toe with other managers with comparable squads, the other might think he lacks some talent and skills other managers have. And we can discuss that - without claims that the guy who doesn’t like Ole’s tactical approach wants to see United doomed.
I think the comparisons with other managers are apt.
Ole would not have been appointed in a modern-day anonymous interview based purely on managerial skills and experience. That is obvious. Similarly, if Ole was to quit tomorrow, the elite clubs would not even consider him, to be honest, I doubt many clubs from any of the top European divisions would consider him.
That isn't to say he therefore can't be successful, or he wasn't the right appointment. I think it's obvious that cold hard 'previous experience' is not the only thing that matters, for example, Poch at PSG may be considered a superb tactical manager but isn't right for that job, and whilst someone like Sean Dyche has done obviously very well in his role, it would be laughable (outside of the ol' lad pundits) to suggest him for a top job.
I think the issue is that Ole is an annoying level of quality in the role. We can argue about how much is in spite of Ole, and how much is because of Ole, but regardless three years in and it feels like Ole's team is always just good enough to justify his retention, but never good enough to truly push on or do what Manchester United / a squad of this quality should be doing.
I think the case for removing Ole, if the aim is to go and win major honours, was clear quite a long time ago. To me it is obvious he is not an elite level manager. However, maybe that isn't the aim. Maybe stability and top four is.
Last edited: