LawCharltonBest
Enjoys watching porn..with foxes
Nope. Enjoying the atmosphere with Ole inEven then you wouldn't want him sacked?
Nope. Enjoying the atmosphere with Ole inEven then you wouldn't want him sacked?
No, what was said was that all professional clubs have good coaching, and that someone who's done their badges and work at the top level know more about what they're doing than angry posters on the Caf. It was in the response to the idea that our coaches are shit and don't know what they're doing, and not, as you keep implying, that we're not allowed to question or criticise "because they have badges."It was literally said.
Oh sure, they are professional footballers they get paid to play football, difference is they get paid 3k a week, our players get paid 200k a week.I like how you always display complete contempt for smaller teams/leagues. The Norwegian league is a fisherman's league, the Swiss champions are a bunch of farmers. They're professional footballers, they get paid to play football.
Nuance is dead.
So that makes it okay to shit on them?Oh sure, they are professional footballers they get paid to play football, difference is they get paid 1k a week, our players get paid 200k a week.
I didn't shit on anybody, farmers league is just an expression. I was emphasising the difference in squad quality.So that makes it okay to shit on them?
You didn't say "farmer's league", you called them "a bunch of farmers". Quite a big difference. One is a (somewhat derogatory) way to describe the quality of a league, the other is just straight shitting on the players for no reason.I didn't shit on anybody, farmers league is just an expression. I was emphasising the difference in squad quality.
Really? So calling the league a farmers league is ok with you, but calling the players that play in that league farmers isn't. Give it up will you. Its just an expression, don't know why you're getting so worked up about it.You didn't say "farmer's league", you called them "a bunch of farmers". Quite a big difference. One is a (somewhat derogatory) way to describe the quality of a league, the other is just straight shitting on the players for no reason.
Why do you feel the need to insult the players?Really? So calling the league a farmers league is ok with you, but calling the players that play in that league farmers isn't. Give it up will you
Are you seriously comparing those 3 managers we had to Conte, Pep and Tuchel?
You think Moyes and Conte are comparable?
Here we go again. It's just an expression!! Insult players... jesusWhy do you feel the need to insult the players?
So nothing?Here we go again. It's just an expression!! Insult players... jesus
Do you play for a Swiss football team or something? What's the matter with you?So nothing?
Matter with me? I'm not the one denigrating smaller teams and leagues.Do you play for a Swiss football team or something? What's the matter with you?
Kin ell... Sorry I called them farmers.. Alright?Matter with me? I'm not the one denigrating smaller teams and leagues.
Both Pep and Ole got their breaks in management due to connections to the club, starting as reserve team manager at a club they played for..
Without a doubt Pep is a better coach but let's not pretend he hasn't had breaks. He inherited a club on the up with the best player of all time, then went to the biggest club in Germany, then to City who had been planning on him for years and backed massively in the transfer market to go from a moderately successful club to where it is.
He's basically been guaranteed success, so its not just his coaching alone.
Its funny how you accuse @ AjaxCunian for "willfully misread those guys" when in your next few posts do the same childish willfully misreading of @UnofficialDevilNo, what was said was that all professional clubs have good coaching, and that someone who's done their badges and work at the top level know more about what they're doing than angry posters on the Caf. It was in the response to the idea that our coaches are shit and don't know what they're doing, and not, as you keep implying, that we're not allowed to question or criticise "because they have badges."
Like I said, you willfully misread what those guys were saying, and have been bleating about it for days as if it's some clever parody of a Ole cultist, and not just complete fabrication on your behalf.
Solskjaer for some reason played to counter the opposition by maintaining a defensive structure. But we didn't carry much
No, what was said was that all professional clubs have good coaching, and that someone who's done their badges and work at the top level know more about what they're doing than angry posters on the Caf. It was in the response to the idea that our coaches are shit and don't know what they're doing, and not, as you keep implying, that we're not allowed to question or criticise "because they have badges."
Like I said, you willfully misread what those guys were saying, and have been bleating about it for days as if it's some clever parody of a Ole cultist, and not just complete fabrication on your behalf.
Unless we are determined to play with 10 men every game against lesser opponent I don’t think we will be reactive like we did against young boys after the sending off. I would like to think we most likely be on the front foot. I dreamt that we did that against a lesser team last week and won 4-1. I know it didn’t happen but one can dream right?Solskjaer for some reason played to counter the opposition by maintaining a defensive structure. But we didn't carry much
threat on the counter, which meant the opposition were comfortable in holding a higher line. There was no tempo to our play and it seems we gave Young Boys alot more respect than they deserved. They were the more proactive team and were playing the game on their terms even before the red card.
And I hope that doesn't become a regular feature for us and we actually look to approach games to be proactive rather than reactive, especially against the lesser teams. But the most damning thing from that article is Young Boys having significantly more shots (19-2) and having significantly more final third passes completed (111-38).
I understand the rest but the rebuilding excuse doesn't stick anymore as Ole has had three summers and spent eyewatering amounts on players. That we have really completed the rebuild shouldn't be an excuse for our inconsistency and some of the brainfarts he keeps on making that cost us matches and progression.
There was a difference to the approach to both games, and I've watched both games twice now. We approached the Newcastle game by playing with more risk which meant Newcastle played on the counter. The game against Young Boys was different in that we maintained defensive structure and committed more players in defensive transition and less in offensive transition. Young Boys were more than a match for us even before the sending off and David Wagner and his team were playing the game on their terms IMO. There was no tempo to our play before the sending off, and after the sending off we resorted to playing containment football which I found personally dissapointing with the quality of players we have at our disposal in comparison to the Swiss team, even with 10 men.Unless we are determined to play with 10 men every game against lesser opponent I don’t think we will be reactive like we did against young boys after the sending off. I would like to think we most likely be on the front foot. I dreamt that we did that against a lesser team last week and won 4-1. I know it didn’t happen but one can dream right?
Apparently there're no wumming from Ole supporters, even though they literally tell people with different opinions to go support another club whenever they open their mouth to take about literally anything not positive about the club. It happened ton of times but yeah, they don't wum at all.
We dont know if Phelan is not rather a part to the problem here. Ole has his weaknesses and it seems like his staff share the same onesWhat is Phelan's influence on Ole's tactical decisions? Surely, he could see that Lingard's unorthodox deep lying position after Fred exited would make us more vulnerable?
I've been a long-time Ole supporter but I now truly feel he has done all he could given his ability. He has definitely instilled a strong sense of positivity in the squad and a brilliant work ethic. It is now time for someone with a winning pedigree to take charge. I'm just not sure who would be suited for the job or available.
I still think we needed Ole but he has done what he was brought here to do - to substantially raise morale and believe.
We dont know if Phelan is not rather a part to the problem here. Ole has his weaknesses and it seems like his staff share the same ones
There was a difference to the approach to both games, and I've watched both games twice now. We approached the Newcastle game by playing with more risk which meant Newcastle played on the counter. The game against Young Boys was different in that we maintained defensive structure and committed more players in defensive transition and less in offensive transition. Young Boys were more than a match for us even before the sending off and David Wagner and his team were playing the game on their terms IMO. There was no tempo to our play before the sending off, and after the sending off we resorted to playing containment football which I found personally dissapointing with the quality of players we have at our disposal in comparison to the Swiss team, even with 10 men.
IMO it comes down to how the manager wants to approach games. And if he wants to approach games by committing more players in defensive transition rather than offensive transition against teams like Young Boys, then I feel we won't be playing a proactive brand of football and will resort to playing in a reactive manner.
And going slightly off topic, I'd just like to say that Kieran McKenna who many are criticizing, is a coach who from my experience of watching his team play at youth level, was a very attacking coach. I honestly believe if McKenna was in charge against Young Boys, we'd have sacrificed defensive stability for goals and played much higher up the pitch.
"Page is not available".
Ole said for his 1st game in charge that McKenna and Carrick were in full charge of tactics/training/everything(when we beat Cardiff 5-1).
That still remains one of our best performances under Ole IMO.
We had the highest PPDA of any team that season(or up to that point). So, whenever I remember that, I don't think new assistance coaches would change much with our approach.
Ole isn't a proactive manager by nature IMO. It would have been obvious by now.
I think it kinda falls into the same thing, if it isn't that being said, posters here are accused ny the same posters of being armchair managers who think they know better than our coaches. Posters that have been questioning our brand or quality of football have been silenced by these things, or called hipsters. Fair enough, enough hyperbole is used when people question our football and our coaches, but it's not going to add anything to attack "the hyperbole" and not the content or intent of what they're saying at all.No, what was said was that all professional clubs have good coaching, and that someone who's done their badges and work at the top level know more about what they're doing than angry posters on the Caf. It was in the response to the idea that our coaches are shit and don't know what they're doing, and not, as you keep implying, that we're not allowed to question or criticise "because they have badges."
Like I said, you willfully misread what those guys were saying, and have been bleating about it for days as if it's some clever parody of a Ole cultist, and not just complete fabrication on your behalf.
Solskjaer was very attacking at Molde from what I saw. And in the games Varane has started we've looked to play with more risk imo. But in the Young Boys game, we had Lindelof and Maguire starting, so I'm wondering if Solskjaer reverted to type because he doesn't trust the pairing in 1v1 scenarios without fullback/midfield assistance. So i'm intrigued to see how we setup with and with out Varane and if a pattern emerges as far as how we approach games.Ole said for his 1st game in charge that McKenna and Carrick were in full charge of tactics/training/everything(when we beat Cardiff 5-1).
That still remains one of our best performances under Ole IMO.
We had the highest PPDA of any team that season(or up to that point). So, whenever I remember that, I don't think new assistance coaches would change much with our approach.
Ole isn't a proactive manager by nature IMO. It would have been obvious by now.
Not meant to be taken literally. In English, its called hyperbole.Kin ell... Sorry I called them farmers.. Alright?
Can you find examples of this please? I’m trying to find some “Wumming” like this.
Well go and support PSG then.
I could sort of understand people being angry at a club legend as manager who was say tenth. If you can't even support him when we come 3rd and 2nd in an incredibly tough league and are trying to push on then what kind of fan are you?
What will you be like when the next man gets no higher than 2nd place? Let's just sack everyone who doesn't come 1st. Is that what we now are?
"Page is not available".
Solskjaer was very attacking at Molde from what I saw. And in the games Varane has started we've looked to play with more risk imo. But in the Young Boys game, we had Lindelof and Maguire starting, so I'm wondering if Solskjaer reverted to type because he doesn't trust the pairing in 1v1 scenarios without fullback/midfield assistance. So i'm intrigued to see how we setup with and with out Varane and if a pattern emerges as far as how we approach games.