TheRedDevil'sAdvocate
Full Member
I see Tuchel is going to become the new enemy of the state on here, just like Poch before him. All because people have the audacity to rate him and suggest he's a better manager than Ole.
It surprises you? He basically accepted a 6-month trial at Chelsea and got his three-year deal by winning the CL and amassing more points in the league than anyone bar City. We're here discussing if we should expect from the manager of Manchester United to mount (not win, just be in the whereabouts come spring) a title challenge in his third full season at the club. Imagine, also, the backlash if Tuchel manages to win major honours with Lukaku firing on all cylinders. Not only that, when he took over, Tuchel argued that Chelsea had every right to wait and judge how well he would perform in those six months. As far as one extreme side of the debate goes, you could say Tuchel is the anti-Solskjaer.
As for the debate between Carragher and Neville, it's just a nonsensical discussion for the sake of arguing. Neville is right, of course. Neither Klopp, Pep nor Tuchel would win the title with this United side. Absolutely no chance whatsoever, zero, zilch. What he doesn't say though is that neither of them, 3 years and 400 million pounds after day one, would be relying on a midfield that consists of Fred and Mc Tominay, neither of them would be as dependent as we are now on route-one football and neither of them would not have an answer regrading which is their best-xi, if someone asked them that particular question.