Circumstances are important if we get 90+ points but fail to win the league I would say we didnt delivered but that it was a good job, if we are eliminated in the UCL by PSG or Bayern I wouldn't complain.
But if we end up second again with around 70 points and are eliminated in group stage or by anything else than a power club then yes I will say that's a failure.
That's like keeping Lingard because we don't know if the next player will be an upgrade. You change managers because you're not sure they will get you where you want to be. Instead it seems we keep them because we're not sure the next one will.
I've seen enough from Ole to be convinced he wont be a top manager, would very much rather gamble on another manager.
What does almost means? As if we sometimes do sometimes don't? If that then I totally agree, but that's not good enough. We need consistency to win the league, specially with the current teams that are challenging it.
There are many problems in this club, including the manager. But keeping the manager because of that is like saying we shouldn't buy a new CDM because there's bigger problems than filling that position.
Agreed regarding circumstances.
With regards to the Lingard example, again, theres no point selling him unless theres a purpose. Its like when we Sold Lukaku, I had no issues with us selling him, but we needed a replacement. Ole wanted Haaland clearly, but it seems like the club didnt go all out for him or Haaland chose Dortmund over us (depending on what you read)
Then we ended up going for King? but instead got Ighalo and then extended him, but got Cavani when he became available.
Doesnt seem too planned.
But ive veered off topic. If we got rid of Ole, it would have to be for somebody who is better than him and is a guarantee to be better than him. Otherwise youre getting rid of somebody who is meeting the boards targets.
I get you, as a fan, would gamble on a manager and thus would rather take a chelsea approach. But the club wont. It works for Chelsea as managers are willing to go and try, and knowing if they get sacked they get compensation but before they do, they will mostly be backed to try.
That wont happen here.
But again, I reiterate, the manager isnt the biggest problem at the club, even though I know he has flaws. Thats what my intiial point was. Glazers are a bigger problem for United because they hired the manager (through whatever system they have in place). And if youre bringing in a manager like Ole, you need to fully back him to make up for the flaws. (except, of course, if the target is getting CL football to keep on bringing in the money, then hes meeting the targets, which hes done in the two full seasons hes been our manager)