We play much better football though.People say we need Sancho, Kane and Rice. We'll England have all that plus more and still play like us. Better players don't mean success or even entertainment. That's my point.
We play much better football though.People say we need Sancho, Kane and Rice. We'll England have all that plus more and still play like us. Better players don't mean success or even entertainment. That's my point.
We play much better football though.
And that's why I feel comparing England's incompetent style to our's doesn't make sense. Ole has flaws but we play better football than England.We have a better manager than Southgate.
People complain of Philiips today. But he is used to playing in a very high tempo team and he plays well. So if he fannying about in midfield then it is only down to instructions.
Make Bielsa the manager of England and at least it will be entertaining.
For those who think better players = great football and success, this England team is throwing a massive spanner in your argument
Southgate as out of his depth as Ole.
We have a better manager than Southgate.
Not with Ole, to be honest.Looking forward to the new season, I see.
I feel so so sad for you.Not with Ole, to be honest.
I have for over 40 years mate. Dont need your advice thanks.I feel so so sad for you.
Try supporting your club. You might like it.
A little less than me then.I have for over 40 years mate. Dont need your advice thanks.
No we haven't. We have had superstar players in many of our England teams.England have been shit for years and its not down to just Southgate. Their fans and players have an overrated opinion about themselves. The way I see it, England have had and continue to have good players but have always lacked superstar players needed to be the standout teams in tournaments.
Regarding whether the likes of Sancho, Kane can make a difference at United, well we do have the likes of Bruno and Pogba to add them up with, just like we got Rio, Rooney, Scholes et al to pair with Ronaldo, Vidic, etc. It does make a lot of difference to the team.
I like Southgate but it is a weird comparison. He's a failed club manager who was very lucky to be given the NT job after bringing through some of the kids in the youth team, and after this stint he will become a pundit.I feel overall Southgate has done a better job than Ole, but it is pointless to compare.
Neither have won anything although Ole has 4 cups per season and Southgate had one chance so far in the world cup.
That's why Pep shops in the lower leagues then?For those who think better players = great football and success, this England team is throwing a massive spanner in your argument
Southgate as out of his depth as Ole.
There you again, like I said, I don't need your advice, thanks.A little less than me then.
I'm not going to try to convert you.
You have obviously made your mind up and shut the curtains.
I'll carry on enjoying the best entertainment since Fergie, and see where it takes us.
Always look on the bright side of life.
HaThere you again, like I said, I don't need your advice, thanks.
Based on what?I feel overall Southgate has done a better job than Ole, but it is pointless to compare.
Neither have won anything although Ole has 4 cups per season and Southgate had one chance so far in the world cup.
It's not a fair comparison though as Southgate gets significantly less time to work with his players.And that's why I feel comparing England's incompetent style to our's doesn't make sense. Ole has flaws but we play better football than England.
Comparing 2 managers with very average CVs isn't a strong argument. Ole hasn't won a trophy in more than 8 years and while it was probably an impressive feat in his home country in the footballing world it doesn't mean that much. The less said about Southgate the better. Both United and the NT deserve better than what they currently have.Based on what?
The fact Bruno barely even score goal and assist in Portugal and Southgate actually prefers to start Man city and Chelsea players but bench the Man United players. Somehow Ole managed to get the better out of those players.
That's why Pep shops in the lower leagues then?
I like Southgate but it is a weird comparison. He's a failed club manager who was very lucky to be given the NT job after bringing through some of the kids in the youth team, and after this stint he will become a pundit.
Our players must all be amazingly brilliant. Coming 2nd behind Oil City and their tactical genius manager just with the instruction go out there and enjoy yourselves lads.Pep buys from the top shelves, but he actually knows what the hell to do with said players. It's not just go out there and enjoy yourselves lads.
Based on what?
The fact Bruno barely even score goal and assist in Portugal and Southgate actually prefers to start Man city and Chelsea players but bench the Man United players. Somehow Ole managed to get the better out of those players.
Our players must all be amazingly brilliant. Coming 2nd behind Oil City and their tactical genius manager just with the instruction go out there and enjoy yourselves lads.
Imagine what they could actually do with a good manager then. They would be winning quadruples regularly.
If Ole managed England they players would have as many minutes as Haaland in this tournament.
Steps in dog shit outsideThat bump
Our manager is never safe! Now even Southgate's shiteness is pinned on Ole!
So Ole getting second and a final is because the players did it all by themselves, but Pep works miracles with £50m cast-offs?Pep buys from the top shelves, but he actually knows what the hell to do with said players. It's not just go out there and enjoy yourselves lads.
Our players must all be amazingly brilliant. Coming 2nd behind Oil City and their tactical genius manager just with the instruction go out there and enjoy yourselves lads.
Imagine what they could actually do with a good manager then. They would be winning quadruples regularly.
I knew there was somebody on here I liked.It was a modern day miracle, magnitudes above Leicester’s title win.
Tactically inept manager, tactically inept coaching team, zero tactics, championship level midfield, unorganised defence, cowardly goalkeepers, Gashford, poor mismanaged Pogba, love child Dan James, wasteful Bruno.. and still we came second
It’s a good job the caf have it all sussed and can see through the lies
Steps in dog shit outside
So Ole getting second and a final is because the players did it all by themselves, but Pep works miracles with £50m cast-offs?
You do realise that the most expensive squad assembled got beaten in a final, despite the blessing of the prodigal Pep?You do realize that getting to a final and winning a final are completely different things though. At least we got the play- a-final-cup
Poor Ole has to play with a championship squad and compete against big wallets City, Chelsea and Pool. I hope some day we will grow as a team and as a fan base so that we could compete in the Champions league.
Oh wait, we did play in the ch.league but somehow(?) we crashed in the group stage. Maybe because we had a cheap and thin squad. Maybe that's why we couldn't win a mediocre Villareal that has never gone to a final.
Might be the worst post ever in the history of RedCafe. Well done.For those who think better players = great football and success, this England team is throwing a massive spanner in your argument
Southgate as out of his depth as Ole.
You sound like great fun to watch football with.For those who think better players = great football and success, this England team is throwing a massive spanner in your argument
Southgate as out of his depth as Ole.
You would be in England's thread all day if Ole is managing England.