Wumminator
The Qatar Pounder
A win may be a win, but we are very dull to watch. So, very dull.
Which teams are good to watch out of interest in the Prem?
A win may be a win, but we are very dull to watch. So, very dull.
I never said his achievement is similar to that of reaching qf in CL. My point was whenever Ole passes a hurdle the goal posts keeps on changing to criticize Ole. I thought Thursday night was a professional performance, wish we did that against Leipzig away (naive that day tactically). The first thing couple of posters werw moaning was about Ole not making subs and how we should score more but I don't see such claims put for tuchel and chelsea when they win 1-0. Again no way comparing athletico and Milan but it is not like Milan are some championship side or some average side. They are decent and they probably would have knocked the likes of arsenal out.Difference between the Europa League and Champions League is massive though. Biesla won the Championship, it doesn't make his win comparable to Klopp's PL win. It is impressive but we are talking different worlds here.
He would have to reach a CL final this season too.My point exactly. They wasn’t waiting for him to come good. He’s just lucky he took his opportunity. Read what I wrote. You could have probably got him for £25m. That means he was surplus to requirements.
I’m not ignoring it. You was talking about time for development. I said it’s not required, now you just telling me about externalities. You brought up Stones not me
Well Ole best win the Championship League next season then. We all know he won’t
I would even ask which team are good to watch in general right now? Games are coming thick and fast and one could see every team is grinding out results. Real madrid, juve, barca, even psg, leipzig, Inter, AC all are going game by game and none of them are consistently playing pretty football this season. I saw somewhere this was our 30th game since December 1st (or maybe something like that) week and we have literally played 3 games every week since then. How do people expect us to just run over opponents is beyond me?Which teams are good to watch out of interest in the Prem?
I never said his achievement is similar to that of reaching qf in CL. My point was whenever Ole passes a hurdle the goal posts keeps on changing to criticize Ole. I thought Thursday night was a professional performance, wish we did that against Leipzig away (naive that day tactically). The first thing couple of posters werw moaning was about Ole not making subs and how we should score more but I don't see such claims put for tuchel and chelsea when they win 1-0. Again no way comparing athletico and Milan but it is not like Milan are some championship side or some average side. They are decent and they probably would have knocked the likes of arsenal out.
I don't care if people don't rate Ole, I have my issues with Ole's management too but criticizing someone for the sake of it just shows one's pettiness, which some posters are culprit of. You could identify them by their name and the moment you see their post you know it will be all moaning and whining.
If he wins a trophy or hopefully 2 and gets second place then there will be no arguments he doesn't deserve next year. A poster above said we need a defender and attacker and for the board to back him. I'd argue our biggest need is a top class CM. If we start the season with Mcfred as our most played cm partnership we aren't competting for the big trophies. I don't think Ole is good enough. He has issues with subs, squad rotation, tactics and talent recognition. I'd love to proven wrong and for him to win the trophies we want but keeping this season aside, we need a big summer. Keep Pogba, sign a midfielder and one other signing and ole should have no excuses when it comes to his team.
I honestly haven't seen enough of him to have a solid opinion. As someone who was wrong about Jack Rodwell and considering how we overpaid for awb and Maguire I'd rather we buy non English players if possible. Ndidi is my number one option.Im still all for Declan Rice. Rice and Sancho should be enough.
Yeah very funny. The only other time I was negative was when Moyes was manager. And yes it is sad to have to search 10 years of posts.[
This is quite sad of me but it did make me laugh, the first 3 I thought of were @Mainoldo @Schmeichel's Cartwheel and incouldnt remember the last one, unrelated pseudo or unofficial devil or something like that so just searched @UnofficialDevil to see what posts he had made and if it was him or not I was thinking of, and there’s people from 2010 calling him out for being negative , then again in 2012 That’s a long ass ten plus years of negativity.
Sorry, and like I said, quite sad or petty of me to search but I was curious and it just made me laugh.
That's not the point. The point is lot of players don't start hitting their full potential before 25. Read what I wrote. Not every players develop in early phase like Rooney, Ronaldo and Messi.My point exactly. They wasn’t waiting for him to come good. He’s just lucky he took his opportunity. Read what I wrote. You could have probably got him for £25m. That means he was surplus to requirements.
You are still ignoring it that both Klopp & Ole didn't inherit top/world class players in their prime like Pep and Conte had at City & Chelsea thus both Klopp and Ole needed much more time to build and develop the squad to win title. Stones is an example of how player needs time to develop and Pep was only able to win the title previously not because Stones but because he had players like Kompany, Aguero, KDB, Silva and Fernandinho, you are also still ignoring that he had those players together at their prime.I’m not ignoring it. You was talking about time for development. I said it’s not required, now you just telling me about externalities. You brought up Stones not me
All perspective isn’t it. We will never know. What I do know is to win those trophies is you need a proper squad, either you already have those bunch of top/world class players or you need to build and develop the squad which takes time.Well Ole best win the Championship League next season then. We all know he won’t
I just typed your username in mate and there they were on first page, I didn’t go through 10 years of postsYeah very funny. The only other time I was negative was when Moyes was manager. And yes it is sad to have to search 10 years of posts.
Really.Well mate. The only time I've been negative was with Moyes and now with Ole because I don't think ether of them are good enough. So you found a post from 2010 about something I didn't agree with. Still think that's sad. Its probably you that's miserable.I just typed your username in mate and there they were on first page, I didn’t go through 10 years of posts
I didnt realise moyes was our manager in 2010
I don’t want to make a fuss out of it, I’m sorry if I upset you. I just thought you was a poster I found was overly negative, searched the words unofficial and devil to see as I might have got it wrong and the very first page was posters moaning about you being negative, one in 2010 and the other in 2012. That is allReally.Well mate. The only time I've been negative was with Moyes and now with Ole because I don't think ether of them are good enough. So you found a post from 2010 about something I didn't agree with. Still think that's sad. Its probably you that's miserable.
I honestly haven't seen enough of him to have a solid opinion. As someone who was wrong about Jack Rodwell and considering how we overpaid for awb and Maguire I'd rather we buy non English players if possible. Ndidi is my number one option.
Thats ok, thanks for saying sorry, no worries. I probably do come across as negative because I'm not happy with Ole as our manager and most of my posts are about that. I made the same mistake of posting too much when Moyes was manager and got the Anti Scottish tag..I don’t want to make a fuss out of it, I’m sorry if I upset you. I just thought you was a poster I found was overly negative, searched the words unofficial and devil to see as I might have got it wrong and the very first page was posters moaning about you being negative, one in 2010 and the other in 2012. That is all
That's not the point. The point is lot of players don't start hitting their full potential before 25. Read what I wrote. Not every players develop in early phase like Rooney, Ronaldo and Messi.
You are still ignoring it that both Klopp & Ole didn't inherit top/world class players in their prime like Pep and Conte had at City & Chelsea thus both Klopp and Ole needed much more time to build and develop the squad to win title. Stones is an example of how player needs time to develop and Pep was only able to win the title previously not because Stones but because he had players like Kompany, Aguero, KDB, Silva and Fernandinho, you are also still ignoring that he had those players together at their prime.
All perspective isn’t it. We will never know. What I do know is to win those trophies is you need a proper squad, either you already have those bunch of top/world class players or you need to build and develop the squad which takes time.
Klopp finished on 75 points and 4th in his 3rd season. Lying to prove a point isn't really helping the debate here.Yeah sure, this would make a great text on brochure, wouldn't it? Warm feelings and statements that mostly are very difficult to prove or prove against.
Let's examine though what you did there: you brought Klopp into the comparison. Klopp in the end of his 3rd year was in a CL final and got 89 points in the league. He came to Liverpool having won the Bundesliga two times went to a CL final with Dortmund. Lets not go further into it, it just isn't a good comparison.
You infer that somebody who doesn't share your view about progress and aspirations has to have a closed mind and eyes. Well, that's bolt, isn't it? How come your opinions and arguments carry more weight than others?
No need to defend Mainoldo and I disagree with a lot of his statements but we should level the playing field once and for all: For all the trust you have in Ole and the progress he makes, you don't know the outcome. And you also don't know, if we wouldn't be at the exact same spot or maybe even better with a different coach. Nobody knows it.
Pretending you would know that is no better than suggesting that we would certainly be better off with a different manager.
So one of Mainoldos statement holds a deep truth: you made the decision to perceive matters on a very positive way for the current manager. That's well and fine. But it doesn't make you more right, a better fan or anything in comparison to people who decide to perceive matters not as positive as you do.
Klopp finished on 75 points and 4th in his 3rd season. Lying to prove a point isn't really helping the debate here.
He also got knocked out early in the league cup and fa Cup so perhaps the comparison is fair.
Klopp finished on 75 points and 4th in his 3rd season. Lying to prove a point isn't really helping the debate here.
He also got knocked out early in the league cup and fa Cup so perhaps the comparison is fair.
Well we don’t have any players of that level so basically you are hoping on a miracle? I can see why we aren’t going nowhere fast. The club probably think like you. We’ll wait for Rooney, Ronaldo and Messi to develop out of Rashford, Martial and Scotty.
Mate Conte had Hazard. Everyone else was just good players. Stop bringing confirmation bias to this argument.
Again Pep hasn’t been to one Champions League final with his superior squad. So all perspective. We will win the league and when we do everything you believe in now will have nothing to do with why we win it.
Klopp finished on 75 points and 4th in his 3rd season. Lying to prove a point isn't really helping the debate here.
He also got knocked out early in the league cup and fa Cup so perhaps the comparison is fair.
I disagree with most of the post you were replying to as well but Klopp finished 4th with 75 points while we’re on track to finish 2nd with 75 points.
He then went on to win the Champions League the next season while finishing 2nd in the league with 97 points. And then went on to win the league the season after that with 99 points.
I wish people would stop using Klopp and Liverpool’s progress as a comparative. It’ll only end in disappointment.
Klopp needed 4. 5 to win itStones just fits in well with this new system. It’s not 5 years of development waiting for this very season for him to come good. You could have probably got him for £25m in the summer if anyone wanted to spend the money.
But meanwhile whilst he was ‘developing’ . They was winning titles.
Anyway nice attempt you tried hard to back your corner of needing time. But it’s quite simple good managers know how to build teams whilst also getting results fast. There’s numerous recent examples but feel free to let me know what manager had needed 5 years to get a team in a position to be title contenders.
That was Klopp's 2nd full season in charge. It's true that Liverpool finished 4th with 75 points that season but didn't mention that they also played in the Champions League final which OGS won't acheive at the end of his 2nd full season in charge of United.
Yeah I remember they beat the mighty Roma in the semis. Cup competitions can produce shock finalistsThat was Klopp's 2nd full season in charge. It's true that Liverpool finished 4th with 75 points that season but didn't mention that they also played in the Champions League final which OGS won't acheive at the end of his 2nd full season in charge of United.
So, so far so good then. Grealish will be our Van Dijk signing and next year we'll go close. Cup runs are hard to guage because it's often about the luck of the draw.I disagree with most of the post you were replying to as well but Klopp finished 4th with 75 points while we’re on track to finish 2nd with 75 points.
He then went on to win the Champions League the next season while finishing 2nd in the league with 97 points. And then went on to win the league the season after that with 99 points.
I wish people would stop using Klopp and Liverpool’s progress as a comparative. It’ll only end in disappointment.
I disagree with most of the post you were replying to as well but Klopp finished 4th with 75 points while we’re on track to finish 2nd with 75 points.
He then went on to win the Champions League the next season while finishing 2nd in the league with 97 points. And then went on to win the league the season after that with 99 points.
I wish people would stop using Klopp and Liverpool’s progress as a comparative. It’ll only end in disappointment.
So, so far so good then. Grealish will be our Van Dijk signing and next year we'll go close. Cup runs are hard to guage because it's often about the luck of the draw.
Bottom line, Ole needs to be backed with a big signing in his 3rd summer the way Klopp was with Van Dijk. Then the comparison will be fair and Ole won't have excuses if we don't challenge next year.
First of all points totals are completely irrelevant, you don’t get a bigger trophy for winning the league with 90+ points rather than 80+ points, this is all Liverpool and Man City propaganda to claim they were the best PL sides ever, I hardly ever heard anyone talking about points totals a few years ago.
Why is it ridiculous to compare Klopp’s time at Liverpool and Ole’s time at United? It’s not ridiculous at all. We’ll go off full seasons:
Klopp - 4th, 4th, 2nd, 1st, 6th (this season)
Ole - 3rd, 2nd (this season)
Nobody is comparing Klopp and Ole as Managers but to say their times at each club can’t be compared and to say that Klopp outperformed Ole in his first 2 seasons is actually laughable.
To be fair the "proper squad" argument is biased, how could anyone argue a team that reaches a UCL final is not a "proper squad"?The point of using Klopp is not about the comparative of their progress to ours. But instead, it is used to show people that you need to have proper squad to win those trophies, if you don't have the proper squad then you need to rebuild the squad. It will take time and sacrifices/cost.
Those time should be used to develop & improve the young talented players which what we are doing. And sign players for area that we don't have top talent players to develop which the board fail to deliver last summer. Unlike us, Liverpool board delivered what the squad needed in those period when they were still in transition to build the team before they won their first trophy. The sacrifices/cost will be similar to what happened to Klopp at Liverpool that they won nothing in those transition years.
Klopp reached the Champions league final in his "second" season and the 3rd season he won the champions league and got second in the league.First of all points totals are completely irrelevant, you don’t get a bigger trophy for winning the league with 90+ points rather than 80+ points, this is all Liverpool and Man City propaganda to claim they were the best PL sides ever, I hardly ever heard anyone talking about points totals a few years ago.
Why is it ridiculous to compare Klopp’s time at Liverpool and Ole’s time at United? It’s not ridiculous at all. We’ll go off full seasons:
Klopp - 4th, 4th, 2nd, 1st, 6th (this season)
Ole - 3rd, 2nd (this season)
Nobody is comparing Klopp and Ole as Managers but to say their times at each club can’t be compared and to say that Klopp massively outperformed Ole in his first 2 seasons is actually laughable.
Klopp reached the Champions league final in his "second" season and the 3rd season he won the champions league and got second in the league.
We are nowhere near a CL final this year, neither are we next year and I bet no one of his supporters would dare to say we will ever reach the CL final next year never mind winning it. That is why Managers should be giving only two full season to show what they are capable of winning major trophies. In his "second" season Klopp played great football and was one step from winning the CL league. We are nowhere near that level. I am not even talking about our 3rd position with 66 points while Klopp was 4th with 76 points.
The position does not say all the truth, the points does.
Irrelevant.Were the Leicester team that won the league better than the treble winning United team?
WTF are you on about?
Hazard, Costa, Matic, Azpi, Cahill, Courtois, Willian and etc. These are players who were still in their prime that not too long ago won the PL before Conte came in. Neither Klopp & Ole had the same bunch level of players when they came in, players that were still in their prime.
Isn't it the main reason why Pep was heavily criticised because his poor delivery in UCL despite of the squad and money he had and was given.
You haven't counter the point at all so the point still stands that you need a proper squad to win the title, if you don't have the proper squad then you need to rebuild the squad again by developing and improving the current top talent players which what we are doing now and we have shown progress in this, and if there are areas that we don't have the right players to develop then we need to buy in the market which the board failed to deliver last summer and it's not Ole's fault.
The fact that you think two additional players should be enough in your other post/conversation with Desert Eagle shows that we are currently on the right track to build a proper team that can challenge or win the title, squad is well rebuilt & well developed, players are showing improvement to reach their full potential.
Klopp reached the Champions league final in his "second" season and the 3rd season he won the champions league and got second in the league.
We are nowhere near a CL final this year, neither are we next year and I bet no one of his supporters would dare to say we will ever reach the CL final next year never mind winning it. That is why Managers should be giving only two full season to show that they are capable of winning major trophies. In his "second" season Klopp played great football and was one step from winning the CL league. We are nowhere near that level. I am not even talking about our 3rd position with 66 points while Klopp was 4th with 76 points.
The position does not say all the truth, the points does.
With Grealish we would have a fair old crack at itThat seems a reasonable viewpoint.
Grealish would probably have a similar impact to VVD given how many of his strengths fall in areas that we’re particularly weak in; much like Van Dijk and Liverpool before he joined.
It’s the bolded part where I think this constant comparison to Klopp will fall flat. Klopp didn’t just make Liverpool challenge - he won the Champions League and then the season after won the Premier League. It’s way too high a metric to use to judge Ole by.
To be fair the "proper squad" argument is biased, how could anyone argue a team that reaches a UCL final is not a "proper squad"?
Truth is while some players are always class under any manager most look good, average or bad depending on the teams level and thats on the manager.
For example Spurs went into a UCL final recently under Poch, no one will say they didnt have a "proper squad" now after changing managers they dont look remotely close to that level. Its basically the same squad, so what happened?
At the end of the day managers influence big time a players potential/level. Thinking about Klopp his squad by names was average until it wasnt, sure you may say they brought players with huge potential and its true, but at the time nobody was impressed by the likes of Robertson, Henderson, Wijnaldun, Salah, etc.