Berbasbullet
Too Boring For A Funny Tagline
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 21,798
Why thank you!I enjoyed this take.
Why thank you!I enjoyed this take.
What I would say is those defending the set up today, did you do the same when Mourinho was here and did it twice at Anfield? Cos I remember the reaction after the 0-0 here in 2017 was almost unanimously negative.
100%, we have someone like Grealish in there and the transition would be so much better. We should have won today really, game plan was spot on.
It wasn’t a cowardly setup, what a load of absolute bollocks. Setup and tactics were fine, mentality issues seem to be with some of the players but we were the better team for 70 minutes of the game and created two game-winning chances that should have taken us to three points. At some point the
He places too much faith in rubbish forwards, put simply. To play like we do in these big matches, you need clinical world class players. Lads like Martial, Rashford, Bruno and Pogba need heaps of chances to get their eye in.
He places too much faith in rubbish forwards, put simply. To play like we do in these big matches, you need clinical world class players. Lads like Martial, Rashford, Bruno and Pogba need heaps of chances to get their eye in.
So many stupid comments, coward etc. fecking boring.
Doing a cracking job.
I’m neither here not there with the set up today. For all the talk about getting at Liveroool, Fabinho is an absolute beast at centre back and their best central midfielder returned today. Ultimately we had two massive chances to win the game today.
What I would say is those defending the set up today, did you do the same when Mourinho was here and did it twice at Anfield? Cos I remember the reaction after the 0-0 here in 2017 was almost unanimously negative.
How is playing a solid defender who is very comfortable against team playing on the ground and who's very good under press "a bad looking decision"? It's a perfectly natural decision. He's far better than both Bailly and Maguire in those circumstances.No it isn't. And the bold bit just shows you're so far stubborn in your own opinion that even in retrospect you wouldn't say its a bad decision to start him if he fecks up and leads to conceding a goal
I want this to play out differently but every big game in the domestic season has had us churn out shit performances with a Lindelof-Maguire combination. The last outing was particularly dogshit on defence particualrly. He dropped Baily when we played City, dropped for Lindelof and Maguire. For what? We got dicked on on set pieces.
This isn't about any agenda, because Ole has earned enough good will to take this risk, but whether it's Ole or SAF himself, a bad looking decision is a bad looking decision.
Not really your call to make, friend.end of.
Possession != control.Dude...
It is though, are you happy with how we used the ball today. Even ole is saying the Same in the post matchIt isn't though, is it.
Your charge is that our set-up was cowardly, which isn't anywhere near what Ole said, so I don't know how you think that counts as a point in your favour.It is though, are you happy with how we used the ball today. Even ole is saying the Same in the post match
He places too much faith in rubbish forwards, put simply. To play like we do in these big matches, you need clinical world class players. Lads like Martial, Rashford, Bruno and Pogba need heaps of chances to get their eye in.
Seems ole agrees... friendHow is playing a solid defender who is very comfortable against team playing on the ground and who's very good under press "a bad looking decision"? It's a perfectly natural decision. He's far better than both Bailly and Maguire in those circumstances.
Not really your call to make, friend.
It is though, are you happy with how we used the ball today. Even ole is saying the Same in the post match
They didn’t look there for the taking for the majority of the first half though did they.Agree, people shouted me down for saying we should go for it. From what I just saw they were massively there for the taking and we played their reputation.
You saw us controlling "most" of that game?Possession != control.
He said we didn’t use the ball enough, which we didn’t. We didn’t set up positively and the changes were the wrong ones, we weren’t brave enough. Maybe cowardly is harsh but we didn’t set up to win that and ended up playing far worse than we can. People can be happy with the result but realise we are far better value that than performance.Your charge is that our set-up was cowardly, which isn't anywhere near what Ole said, so I don't know how you think that counts as a point in your favour.
Echos my feelingsWish he’d stop being so afraid in the big games.
Could tell with the Lindelof selection that the game plan would be to sit deep and look to counter...
Would be nice for once if we looked to take initiative and play on the front foot - especially with their defence today.
Hopefully he’ll soon realise that Mcfred isn’t the answer. We lose the ball too easily and they’re poor at picking a forward pass.
Having said all that, it’s a good point in the end but that’s now 0 goals (other than a penalty) in 6 ‘big’ games.
Don’t agree at all. Some call it cowardly and you say we didn’t have ambitions to win. You even complain about the subsI don’t often criticise but he’s got it massively wrong today both tactically from the start and with his subs. We didn’t turn up, didn’t show any ambition to win and just the wrong subs way too late. He’s admitted today we won’t in the league which we probably already knew but it’s a really poor performance. That will teach me for believing we could actually do it.
Sure I appreciate all that. My disappointment is because I know we are better than we showed today. We didn’t get on the ball, we don’t try and play and we didn’t create as much as we have shown we can. I think Ole felt the same way but he also didn’t set us up to play as much as we can.Of course I'd always want to see us play great football and go and kill Liverpool. Id like nothing more than that.
But
Top of the league
Gone away to the champions and come away with a point.
Just think back to how shit things have been the last 8 years or so. Of course things aren't perfect, but for the first time in a long time there is genuine progress and genuine signs of encouragement.
Those chances we created were half chances and I wouldn’t expect them to be taken. I’ve expressed my position in this thread, we can be miles better and we shouldn’t have allowed Liverpool to dominate as much as they did with the side they had out. Yet again we haven’t been brave enough in a big game. We can do more.Don’t agree at all. Some call it cowardly and you say we didn’t have ambitions to win. You even complain about the subs
The second half clearly shows the opposite of “no ambitions”. The match/plan was perfect, and if we had been more precise with our final passings we could have created several big chances.
I’m happily with the game plan and the performance today. It showed we have more quality in our team than LFC.
I agree they were always going to start strongly, I’ll say it again though, do you truly not believe we can do more than that with the ball. We just didn’t have any control over any periods of the game which I know we are capable of. We need to have more ball .They didn’t look there for the taking for the majority of the first half though did they.
Different selection and they could have won the game in that period.
Easy to have an opinion with hindsight.
We could have won that game with two huge chances in the second half. Not like we totally bottled it.
Lindelof isn't a bad defender that's not the argument.How is playing a solid defender who is very comfortable against team playing on the ground and who's very good under press "a bad looking decision"? It's a perfectly natural decision. He's far better than both Bailly and Maguire in those circumstances.
Sure I appreciate all that. My disappointment is because I know we are better than we showed today. We didn’t get on the ball, we don’t try and play and we didn’t create as much as we have shown we can. I think Ole felt the same way but he also didn’t set us up to play as much as we can.
You really underestimate Grealish. He's the type of player who can influence a teams general play on his own. He's that good. He's done it with a free role at Villa and a disciplined role.Grealish would help but doing it at Villa with total fluidity of positional play and doing it for us is completely different. Press resistant individuals doesn't equate to a press resistant team. All that happens is the opposition double up to nullify the strengths. We are not going to see a possession based level of influence with Solskjaer as the manager. It's not his strengths nor his philosophy, he's provided the team with togetherness and unity with some tactical nous to create chances that is all we are going to get and on the basis of the league this season it's enough to grab a title.
Good point. Klopp made his first sub after 77mins..Dont know why he refuse to make subs.
Big managers make subs in the 45-60th minute which decide the game.
Ole watches watches and watches and then subs Greenwood in the 90th.
I just don’t think so. I’d say we were far better against city and yet we lost that. I’d just rather us try and do more. That felt that a game under Jose.Hyperbole.
We didn't dominate the ball but that we didn't try and play is silly nonsense.
Yes I agree that needs to improve, it did somewhat in the second half.I agree they were always going to start strongly, I’ll say it again though, do you truly not believe we can do more than that with the ball. We just didn’t have any control over any periods of the game which I know we are capable of. We need to have more ball .
Also agree that’s got to be the clear upgrade in this team. You can carry either/or but we have to have someone more progressive in that midfield partnership. The reason I use the word cowardly, is because I think we should have pushed Pogba deep and gone to a 4-5-1 like we are best at and had Cavani/Greenwood on in the 60th/70th minute. We could have easily done some damage to that Liverpool team.Yes I agree that needs to improve, it did somewhat in the second half.
I said in the Bruno thread a minute ago that it doesn’t help having both Fred and Scott on the pitch (just to do the job of one top level DM.)
They are both limited in their passing and negative with their positioning, which isn’t conducive to retaining possession especially under a Klopp press.
Big managers make subs in the 45-60th minute which decide the game.
I think his starting tactics were okay and we approached the game fine first half as Liverpool were always going to come out strong. Personally we should have been braver in that second half, Pogba deep for Fred/McTominay, and get on another attacker alongside Martial and Rashford.He was cowardly today. Liverpool had a lot of missing players. We should have gone all out for the win. I cant understand his attitude today. First not playing Bailly and being so defensive against a weekened Liverpool