But he was candid in deconstructing the players; he knows full well he could do the same thing to the staff, but holds back even going as far as to again point toward Ole having these players in the trenches and having every right to doubt them.To be fair to Keane he did say it was more hope than belief he had in Ole and that 'he might be better off out of it'
He also questioned whether the players had lost faith in the coaching staff.
He still went in harder on the players but he's more honest than Neville who literally refused to answer the question over whether another manager would do a better job with some nonsense about LVG and Mourinho.
They're not United fans. United is a vehicle for them and their friends. Their attachment to United gets them jobs in the media and their friends can get jobs at the club. It's an inner-circle looking to protect themselves.feck them all. Pathetic excuses for pundits and United fans.
Are you being serious? Or just defending those that don't want to call Ole out like you have for months or even years?
They should still be able to articulate the issues without going out to hurt a friend, there is nothing wrong with saying maybe a change is needed.Ole is a person Neville and Keane probably still speak to on a fairly regular basis. The fault here isn’t theirs, you’d have to be a special kind of cnut to try and get a friend fired.
Sky and BT need to get some different pundits if they’re wanting an unbiased opinion. Dig out Gordon Strachan, maybe throw some work to some older players like Whiteside, even somebidy like Ince who didn’t play with Ole too much as far as I can recall. But we shouldn’t be expecting people who’ve had 20 year plus friendships with the manager to throw him under the bus, or realistically expect them to have and share an opinion based on pure objectivity, regardless of what sky pay them for it.
They wouldn't though because no-one would pay them as much as now if they were not commenting on Man Utd. They are living off their united connection same way Ole is - and they perhaps unconsciously feel that they are in the same place as him and therefore feel the urge to detect blame from him.They should all recuse themselves from commenting on United if they're incapable of being objective. In any other line of work, there would be rules in place to prevent conflicts of interest.
Correct. Sick of it.
Ole is a person Neville and Keane probably still speak to on a fairly regular basis. The fault here isn’t theirs, you’d have to be a special kind of cnut to try and get a friend fired.
Sky and BT need to get some different pundits if they’re wanting an unbiased opinion. Dig out Gordon Strachan, maybe throw some work to some older players like Whiteside, even somebidy like Ince who didn’t play with Ole too much as far as I can recall. But we shouldn’t be expecting people who’ve had 20 year plus friendships with the manager to throw him under the bus, or realistically expect them to have and share an opinion based on pure objectivity, regardless of what sky pay them for it.
The point I’m trying to make here is that it literally does not make the slightest bit of difference if an ex-man utd player turned pundit called out Ole.
It won’t change a thing & yet people on here are getting a hard on for the likes of Nev, Rio not calling him out.
Literally who gives a feck, because the Glazers sure don’t care.
Might as well just scream at a cloud “Ole Out” has the same effect.
You’re aware that they are instead apportioning blame to the players and making life even more difficult for them? Keane is a god for a lot of the support (perhaps my favourite United player of all-time) and his words carry a lot of weight; it’s not like he’s letting up or holding back, rather it’s all being reserved for the players, doubly so, because he won’t say a bad word about Ole/the staff, so no, it’s not good or constructive for him or Neville to do what they’re doing on the grandest stage of influence a platform can have in the UK. If they don’t wish to be objective, why are they taking on the gig of commenting on United? Keane is TV gold and in hot demand, he certainly doesn’t need United games to raise his profile. Neville’s an established pundit by now; he’s tying himself in knots, it’s just that for once, he’s been called out on it.Ole is a person Neville and Keane probably still speak to on a fairly regular basis. The fault here isn’t theirs, you’d have to be a special kind of cnut to try and get a friend fired.
Sky and BT need to get some different pundits if they’re wanting an unbiased opinion. Dig out Gordon Strachan, maybe throw some work to some older players like Whiteside, even somebidy like Ince who didn’t play with Ole too much as far as I can recall. But we shouldn’t be expecting people who’ve had 20 year plus friendships with the manager to throw him under the bus, or realistically expect them to have and share an opinion based on pure objectivity, regardless of what sky pay them for it.
Ole Gonna SulkjaerNeville, Keane constantly talk about the body language of certain players but never talk about the body language of Ole who sits on the bench in the stand all game doing feck all. Their double standards are off the scale.
They're not United fans. United is a vehicle for them and their friends. Their attachment to United gets them jobs in the media and their friends can get jobs at the club. It's an inner-circle looking to protect themselves.
Chelsea are too busy winning, with someone who is a winner. We are stuck with a perennial loser as a manager. Absolutely stuck. Everyone around us has only improved and we’ve spent more than all of them and the team is worse. It’s beyond embarrassing now.Ask Chelsea fans what is the difference between a club legend and a proper manager.
You guys care too much about this
They're his mates, do you honestly expect them to sit there and openly demand that he should be sacked? Anything less than absolute support is damning enough.
And there's only Neville who is going so far as to suggest that changing the manager won't necessarily help.
I dunno why people let it get them so agitated. Souness and co. are there to provide balance and that's what they're doing by making sure it gets discussed in the first place. If the club is relying on Sky Sports punditry to make decisions then it's no wonder we're in the shit.
SchmeichelApart from Neville, who else isn't criticizing Ole? Scholes, Owen ripped into him today.
No instead we have a hugely clueless and inferior version of conte who if anything is even more pragmatic and can't win even the league cup despite spending a hundreds of millionsNeville is nothing but a clown by saying there's no way we would bring Conte because of Jose.
Yeah I find it bizarre too. People moan when ex-Liverpool pundits constantly rip United, then get apoplectic that some ex-United players duck questions on Ole.They're his mates, do you honestly expect them to sit there and openly demand that he should be sacked? Anything less than absolute support is damning enough.
And there's only Neville who is going so far as to suggest that changing the manager won't necessarily help.
I dunno why people let it get them so agitated. Souness and co. are there to provide balance and that's what they're doing by making sure it gets discussed in the first place. If the club is relying on Sky Sports punditry to make decisions then it's no wonder we're in the shit.