They are holding up their hands again, they can‘t buy players in summer otherwise.They’ll pay anyone but their players
They are holding up their hands again, they can‘t buy players in summer otherwise.They’ll pay anyone but their players
You paid someone you shouldn’t have been. It’s irrelevant what it was for. It’s unethical and a massive conflict of interests but Barcelona knew that and that’s why the method in which it was done is shady as feck.
Wow, simply just wow. Feck Barca what a dirty club. I'd bet there must be a shit ton of similar incidents that went unrecorded.For example: In the 2017/2018 season, Suarez clearly fouled Varane in a build up to a Messi goal. The fourth official (Escudero Marín) told the referee (Alejandro Hernández Hernández), or more so shouted, "It's a Suarez foul! It's a Suarez foul" in the communication system but the referee ignored him. It was randomly caught on camera and created a media storm. The fourth official, Escudero Marín, was relegated to the third division (from the Segunda where he was a full on referee), his 7 years progress through the ranks was stopped, and he retired.
To be fair, the anti Vax thing has proven to be real. Government has already paid out of deaths caused by the vaccine. Upto £120,000.Fair play to @Niemans for joining the likes of flat earthers, anti-vaxxers, and all the rest with their nonsense.
It’s not the money. If you want reports you go to ex-referee’s. You don’t go to someone with influence amongst current officials.They overpaid for reports that may be unethical but had no influence on the pitch.
They've taken way to long to produce them for them to be convincing at this point. Release them the next day when this story first came up and ok you've paid about 20 times the normal fee, to someone currently active in the game, off the books, via a pile of shell companies but at least theres something to show for the money. Even a week after and you say they might not have been easy to track down and they wanted to be thorough to get all the stuff they had out.They overpaid for reports that may be unethical but had no influence on the pitch.
They've taken way to long to produce them for them to be convincing at this point. Release them the next day when this story first came up and ok you've paid about 20 times the normal fee, to someone currently active in the game, off the books, via a pile of shell companies but at least theres something to show for the money. Even a week after and you say they might not have been easy to track down and they wanted to be thorough to get all the stuff they had out.
This kicked off a month ago.
That's what you hope, yes. But it's not a fact.They overpaid for reports that may be unethical but had no influence on the pitch.
To be fair, the anti Vax thing has proven to be real. Government has already paid out of deaths caused by the vaccine. Upto £120,000.
That doesn't mean the anti-vaxxers were right.
The existence of these reports doesn't prove anything either. The prosecution likely has had access to them for some time and pressed charges anyways, which means they believe them to be a cover up for the real reason behind the payments
Negreira said that. Barcelona and Javier Enriquez said they were written.Barcelona itself said Negreira reports were verbal, not written.
But if those videos existed, would that make paying the refs legal? So all the message is: "if you intend to bribe, be more careful about the cover story, why you are paying the referee."? So they could continue paying them in future, and only take more care about creating some videos?I think there's a lot of fixation on the "referee reports" thing because it's very salacious, but it misses the point a little bit.
All the invoices we've had access to, the stuff that the tax agency found suspicious, were for "technical videos." I'm not sure we've actually seen any invoices for "referee reports" anywhere.
I think the trial would have to establish whether the transaction is real beyond 'do the videos exist.'But if those videos existed, would that make paying the refs legal? So all the message is: "if you intend to bribe, be more careful about the cover story, why you are paying the referee."? So they could continue paying them in future, and only take more care about creating some videos?
yeah. plus 120k is nothing compared to the improved 5g coverage.
We have new information being released almost on a daily basis, and my feeling is that we are just seeing the peak of the iceberg.
Negreira's son leaked to Barça the referee for a cup final three months earlier: "It will be Clos Gómez"
Yeah. This reports prove nothing. Obviously nobody is gonna believe they are worth 7M€. Which is why probably Barca didn't show them the very first day this scandal was revealed. It looks like they were made as an alibi to justify the payments.The existence of these reports doesn't prove anything either. The prosecution likely has had access to them for some time and pressed charges anyways, which means they believe them to be a cover up for the real reason behind the payments.
I did not know this until yesterday, but Negreira wrote for Mundo Deportivo under the banner "el juez de LaLiga" in 2019
Yeah. This reports prove nothing. Obviously nobody is gonna believe they are worth 7M€. Which is why probably Barca didn't show them the very first day this scandal was revealed. It looks like they were made as an alibi to justify the payments.
It literally is a referee's wiki and some very basic info all put together in what feels like 5 minutes.
yeah. plus 120k is nothing compared to the improved 5g coverage.
He has proved he is in the early stages of Alzheimer. He might even elude criminal responsibilities without any plea deal.The only way the truth will come out in full is if Negreira takes a plea deal (If that sort of thing even exists in Spain)
Things got ugly quickly for her.Everything surrounding this case has an extraordinarily dark aspect to it:
The judge in charge of investigating the Negreira case was robbed at her home this weekend. The assault took place just a few hours after the Barcelona Prosecutor's Office filed its complaint against FC Barcelona last Friday for the payments to the former vice-president of the Technical Committee of Referees (CTA) José María Enríquez Negreira. According to what police sources have confirmed to El Confidencial, the support magistrate of the Court of Instruction number 1 of Barcelona went to report the facts this Sunday to a police station of the Mossos d'Esquadra. The robbery took place when the magistrate was inside her home, a ground floor house located in a municipality in the vicinity of Barcelona. Despite this, she did not suffer any personal injury or notice anything unusual. The intruders took cash, jewellery and different items. It is being investigated whether they also took documents or electronic devices on which the judge could keep files related to her work.
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
https://www.elconfidencial.com/espa...ca-robo-casa-jueza-denuncia-fiscalia_3591848/
To be fair, the anti Vax thing has proven to be real. Government has already paid out of deaths caused by the vaccine. Upto £120,000.
You have a problem with the truth, or are ya a simpleton?State of this
You have a problem with the truth, or are ya a simpleton?
The breathtaking irony of this post
If you have any posts remaining for today please use it to provide a source for that ridiculous claim you just made.Go on then kid, I'll waste another post on you...internet warrior.
Do you think the earth is flat? You‘re about that stupid.You have a problem with the truth, or are ya a simpleton?
Things got ugly quickly for her.
What are the chances this is random?
If not random, I would bet on “hooligans”. One positive thing here is that Barca seems limited to corruption, if there were real gangsters behind this it would have been handled differently. Negreira would have been someone that died in a car crash 5 years ago,..
The problem is that it is difficult to know whether such burglaries are particularly common in Barcelona. Not long ago a Barça player, Aubameyang, was assaulted and he and his family beaten by unidentified thieves who broke into his house. His jaw was fractured in this incident.
Incidentally, Aubameyang at the time was being heavily attacked by the Barça media and officials because he was opposed to being transferred to Chelsea. Three days after the beating he accepted the deal.
https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/s...-armed-robbery-his-home-barcelona-2022-08-29/
https://www.espn.com/soccer/soccer-...ameyang-joins-chelsea-after-leaving-barcelona
We have new information being released almost on a daily basis, and my feeling is that we are just seeing the peak of the iceberg.
Negreira's son leaked to Barça the referee for a cup final three months earlier: "It will be Clos Gómez"