Joga Bonito
The Art of Football
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2014
- Messages
- 8,283
Ok @Physiocrat randomise this bitch and give me 16th
Welcome back anto
Ok @Physiocrat randomise this bitch and give me 16th
I'm pretty sure I started watching football from 1992 onwards although my first major memory was this sticker album cover:
Sigh. Fine, i'll be the number 2 and put some cones out.
So when do we start? @Physiocrat
Also on double pick for 1st and 16th drafters, we don't know what the randomized injury number will be. So there's no advantage of placing players on 5th or 6th (double picks, for instance).
I'd this the official order?I randomized this bitch and you're bang in the middle
Yes, iso can startI'd this the official order?
Mine was thisVaguely remember that one. First memory is my mate's Mexico '86 one, which miraculously was all intact around the time of Italia '90. First sticker album I spent all my pocket money on was this:
Oh man, that's horrendous. Do it againI randomized this bitch and you're bang in the middle
1. Iso
2. Joga
3. P-Nut
4. Harms
5. Beam
6. Skizzo
7. antohan
8. Michael
9. TheReligion
10. EAP
11. Enigma
12. Gio/Theon
13. Boris
14. Sjor
15. Himann
16. Physio
@Isotope @Joga Bonito @P-Nut @harms @Jim Beam @Skizzo @Michaelf7777777 @TheReligion @Edgar Allan Pillow @Enigma_87 @Gio @Theon @BorisDeLeFora @Šjor Bepo @Himannv @Physiocrat
So when do we start? @Physiocrat
Also on double pick for 1st and 16th drafters, we don't know what the randomized injury number will be. So there's no advantage of placing players on 5th or 6th (double picks, for instance).
Yes this and what's the rules then.
Players at the peak of their powers from the 92/93 season until 2012? World football?
Edit it's those two seasons isn't it. 92/93 and 2011/12?
My thought is that on average 3rd picks will be better than 4th picks so it would make sense for a drafter with a double pick to place their better player 4th so that if round 3 players are blocked it blocks a slightly worse player for them and keeps their better 4th player.
92/93 season until the end of the 2011/12 season including Euro 2012. When playing you need to declare a 3 three consecutive peak for that player within that time period.
But then if Turn 4 is the injured one they lose the slightly better one.
Is that really necessary? I can see the point on explaining the rationale and set appropriate expectations with ageing 90s or youngish 10s.
That said, players who had almost their entire career in that period will have likely played in different systems at different times and you will want to use the different incarnations of that same player as part of squad management. E.g. use Schuster as AM or DLP.
Thanks mate, somehow missed this with all the WW notifications.Welcome back anto
Thanks mate, somehow missed this with all the WW notifications.
Xavi huh? Brave. Doable with two decades worth of players, depends if anyone dares go in that direction without him. Checkmate move that.
Love that pick @Joga Bonito !
Not because of Xavi's status but the implications. Rules out a fair chunk of the pool and you are also left with the challenge of Messi being banned. It's Messi-less Spain all over again. They were a bit good though.Ffs even in this pool xavi is considered a brave pick
You rebel
Great pick mate. Especially in this draft to build around.
Why?Rules out a fair chunk of the pool