Nostalgia Draft: The Final - TheReligion vs Isotope

With all players in their 3 year peaks, which team would win this game?


  • Total voters
    20
  • Poll closed .
Congrats, man. Just think about happy things then. Starting with my team.
No issue with you or your team per se, just that loads of stuff that keeps putting me off drafts applied to this. Not just playing but even bothering to comment.

That's why I deliberately didn't start ranting yesterday but instead got it all out of my chest bang on the final whistle.

So, has a name for the little angel already? Not Zubizareta, is it?
Franco

Need a couple more and I can put together a 5-a-side team with Enzo up top.
 
Thanks Gio. Fair enough on the draw.

Could this be the first 4-4-1-1 winning the Draft? Usually manager got praised when using 4-4-1-1. But then it's different when come to vote.
:lol: go back to your first game and see how I was screaming bloody murder that it was an obvious 4-4-1-1 and for some reason you dressed it up as 4-2-3-1.
 
Also, it's not peak 2012-13 Schweini, or the holding one that had his best tournament performance in 2014. It's the one before him (and Bayern) hit their peak level.

A note for future drafts with specific timeframes: anyone clearly not having their peak during it should be banned. It's a joke really. Most people simply won't separate X player before or after a given date or at least they certainly won't all separate it the same way.

Agree and disagree in the same time. Agreed its often overlooked by many but im also of the opinion that the manager involved in the game should do something about it(like you did with Zubi), if you doing a one page moby then IMO you cant complain.
 
Bastian was born in 1984. By 2009-2012, he was 25-28 y.o. just the peak of his power.

:lol: go back to your first game and see how I was screaming bloody murder that it was an obvious 4-4-1-1 and for some reason you dressed it up as 4-2-3-1.

Was mentioning 4-4-1-1 / 4-4-2 throughout all games. Check it. It was there at all OPs. I can't change them.

Man, you even have issue with Kaka - Ronaldo pair. That's something else, anto.
 
Balu's view on Bastian:

Schweinsteiger gave balance to every midfield he played in between 2009 and 2016 in a way few midfielders could in the past decades, certainly not Kroos. No matter if he played with van Bommel, Khedira, Kroos, Martinez. No matter if it was a midfield 3 with an advanced CM, a 2 behind a playmaker or a 2 behind a 2nd striker. He excelled in all those roles and became the key midfielder in those sides. Kroos needs midfielders around him to balance his weaknesses while Schweinsteiger is the exact opposite. And it's even more obvious to see in the nationalteam post 2014. Even at the Euro 2016 the difference Schweinsteiger made to the team was obvious despite him being way past his peak. Sadly he became the unlucky figure in the semifinal despite overall playing surprisingly well considering his season at United.

He was the deepest midfielder next to Khedira in a 4231 and held a rather weak defense together at the World Cup in 2010 despite his midfield partner's constant gung ho runs forward, yet still had plenty of iconic moments in attack, like the counterattack against England or the run through Argentina's defense. His performances in 2010 have become a bit overshadowed by his world cup final in 2014, but 2010 was the truely outstanding tournament by him. He rose to the occasion after Ballack's injury and took over the main leadership role in the team.
In the treble winning team he seemlessly switched between being the main distributor in midfield in a 442ish formation next to Martinez/Gustavo behind Müller and a 433 with Kroos added, where Schweinsteiger played a lot off the ball.
Then there's the obvious warrior game in the world cup final 2014, which sadly turned out to be his swan song because he ruined his body playing through too many injuries during those years.

Like many said in here, I'd take Schweinsteiger's rather short peak over Modric's, even though it's really really close. While Modric (probably) wins the (overall) comparison once you consider longevity. Kroos is a level below those two.
 
Also, it's not peak 2012-13 Schweini, or the holding one that had his best tournament performance in 2014. It's the one before him (and Bayern) hit their peak level.

A note for future drafts with specific timeframes: anyone clearly not having their peak during it should be banned. It's a joke really. Most people simply won't separate X player before or after a given date or at least they certainly won't all separate it the same way.

I picked him initially and I can't really agree that there is a difference between 11/12 Schweini and 12/13 Schweini. Yes he accomplished more in the treble season and rose to the occasion, but it was the very same player that bossed Bayern midfield the year before, and the year before that and so on. You do know what you get within this timeframe.

Usually we take 3 year peaks in drafts and as I've said I'd take 10-13 as his peak missing that 13/14 season, because to me he wasn't as good domestically an in CL compared to any other of those 10-13 seasons before. He saved himself for that last occasion in the WC in 2014, but in 2010 he was also pretty much great as well.

All in all in the pointed timeframe 09-12 he played in various roles (was both holder and b2b), was at his physical peak and performed up to par to whatever best performance he had outside that timeframe, which for me means he's the same peak Schweinsteiger as he was during 12/13.
 
Agree and disagree in the same time. Agreed its often overlooked by many but im also of the opinion that the manager involved in the game should do something about it(like you did with Zubi), if you doing a one page moby then IMO you cant complain.
What's a one page moby? Sounds like some fun I missed out on.
 
Bastian was born in 1984. By 2009-2012, he was 25-28 y.o. just the peak of his power.
Peak and age (let alone positional prak) are not the same thing, up until 2009 he hadn't even played as a CM.

Was mentioning 4-4-1-1 / 4-4-2 throughout all games. Check it. It was there at all OPs. I can't change them.
The picture man, even in this game it's hardly depicted as 4-4-1-1.

Man, you even have issue with Kaka - Ronaldo pair. That's something else, anto.
It isn't really. Two cracking players but actually you could find that Kaká overlaps with Ronaldo much like Djorkaeff did. @Jim Beam was saying earlier how he could see Ronaldo pulling the defence all over the place ala Sheva.

That's not really how peak Ronaldo played though. One of the most striking things with peak Ronaldo was how he could start moves from deep and be a #10 and #9 rolled into one. In a way, similar to Eusebio, and a reason why once someone went down in flames for pairing Eusebio and Ronaldo. Everything Kaká did (exceptional as he was) was part of what Ronaldo did. That's why he was O Fenómeno, that's why many of us reckon in that trajectory he would have been THE Goat.

Balu's view on Bastian:
You don't need to sell me Bastian, I was picking him in drafts back in 2013 and having a hard time selling him (recency, "maybe by the time he retires", yadda yadda).

I picked him initially and I can't really agree that there is a difference between 11/12 Schweini and 12/13 Schweini. Yes he accomplished more in the treble season and rose to the occasion, but it was the very same player that bossed Bayern midfield the year before, and the year before that and so on. You do know what you get within this timeframe.

Usually we take 3 year peaks in drafts and as I've said I'd take 10-13 as his peak missing that 13/14 season, because to me he wasn't as good domestically an in CL compared to any other of those 10-13 seasons before. He saved himself for that last occasion in the WC in 2014, but in 2010 he was also pretty much great as well.

All in all in the pointed timeframe 09-12 he played in various roles (was both holder and b2b), was at his physical peak and performed up to par to whatever best performance he had outside that timeframe, which for me means he's the same peak Schweinsteiger as he was during 12/13.
I said at the time I knew what I got, a slightly watered down version of the actual peak one.

2009-10 is his first season as CM. Actually, as a million things as LVG loved him and used him all over the pitch. That speaks volumes about his tactical nous and adaptability but doesn't take him anywhere close to his peak.

2010-11 was a more settled CM but Bayern weren't kicking into gear yet.

2011-12 I'd agree he wasn't technically far off 2012-13 level and Bayern themselves could have hit that level earlier too... but he spent about half the season injured, or at least it always seemed like he was either injured or working his way back into form after an injury.

So no, it's not peak Schweinsteiger. Doesn't make the least bit of a difference anyway clearly as far as him being a competent midfielder for a team that just needed that really.

I just keep going on with that case as it's immediately familiar to all, as opposed to the likes of Zubizarreta, Rijkaard, Baresi, Bergomi, Gascoigne and others which were clearly harder to nail down properly.
 
That's more post this era with all the focus on high press tracking back, etc. That's the final nail on the coffin for the classic #10, indeed.

This game though? With all that freedom to roam? He would hit his top level.

You imagine BS doing something despite no such instruction being clearly laid out. That's the beauty of not spelling out your instructions, everyone imagines what they see as optimal. Same has been the case for Iso's defensive line throughout.

You are banging about not being peak BS of 1 year later when the other side is relying on 94' - 97' version of a player in the most crucial position on the pitch. Pretty much slow and immobile version of him as been mentioned above (and I didn’t rate his off ball movement even before, feck he got relegated with Brescia just 2 seasons prior). That version of Hagi spent 2 seasons on the bench in Barcelona with grand total of 36 league games in 2 years being a flop. And you are telling me that exact version of a player will hit his top level or that 2010 - 2012 version of Bastian wouldn't stop him? There was also instruction about Bastian being in a more reserved role behind...
Bastian will be the metronome...



It isn't really. Two cracking players but actually you could find that Kaká overlaps with Ronaldo much like Djorkaeff did. @Jim Beam was saying earlier how he could see Ronaldo pulling the defence all over the place ala Sheva.

That's not really how peak Ronaldo played though. One of the most striking things with peak Ronaldo was how he could start moves from deep and be a #10 and #9 rolled into one. In a way, similar to Eusebio, and a reason why once someone went down in flames for pairing Eusebio and Ronaldo. Everything Kaká did (exceptional as he was) was part of what Ronaldo did. That's why he was O Fenómeno, that's why many of us reckon in that trajectory he would have been THE Goat.

Shevchenko often played in a free striking role, roaming all over the pitch and attacking you from wide areas (Ronaldo often used wide areas as well). Inzaghi, Crespo or even Rebrov were more focal points of the attack, but Kaka used Shevchenko movement to attack central areas and score or to release him with his passing which was the beauty of that partnership. I mean, just look at the video and you will immediately see the similarity in the way Ronaldo attacked.



The fact that Inter was absolute garbage so Ronaldo had to also play as number 10 at times or even deeper is another matter. The way you went about it here sounds like Zico and Ronaldo wouldn't be able to play together.

Yes, I can see overlap with Eusebio and Ronaldo. But, there is no overlap with Kaka and Eusebio.

In the end, it is hard argue with your general point though as I have the same problem with team dynamics being overlooked by individual names. Now that am thinking am probably the only person here who plays regularly and never picked Pele, Maradona, Messi or both Ronaldo in the draft. Even for this ongoing draft Edgar absolutely fecked me with Xavi who was my 1st choice if there were no blocks (often I wasn't among the first to pick, but in most cases they didn't fit in the tactic I went with and me probably being a bit hipster with all this).

However, that is definitely a problem here and why players like Pirlo are useless with GOAT names deciding games while other team being far stronger as a collective. It happened to me before and looking at this particular game, yeah, you can have some arguments about it being the same case and if I was Religion I would probably also feel a bit hard done.
Looking back, it wasn't Hagi who would won the game, but those wingbacks and maybe he should have bang more about them. But, I was far more convinced with Iso attacking pair and think they would work brilliantly. The person who saw this being 0-0 draw was probably mostly right.
 
Last edited:
I think the issue is I was banging on about my wingbacks (I mean Lizarazu and Dani Alves are clearly the best pair in the draft and playing in a system which suits them perfectly). I explained how Kaka and Figo would struggle against my set up but no one either listened or took me on. Not even Iso!

I think I gave plenty of detail and didn't get much back. It's kinda annoying when you do that then find yourself 6/7 votes down without comment.

Anyway I don't think I could have said much more as eventually you get fed up of having the convo with yourself.
 
You are banging about not being peak BS of 1 year later when the other side is relying on 94' - 97' version of a player in the most crucial position on the pitch.

As said, not banging about BS but the borderline issue, which I agree applies to Hagi as well. I didn't even check his stated peak. I know he blew hot and cold but, in the right setup, expect him to blow hot (again, that's where personal perceptions can be very different, as they clearly were with Gascoigne, or Gullit).

There was also instruction about Bastian being in a more reserved role behind...
Case in point, you see metronome and choose to see him as pivot. Metronomes need not be pivots, different/independent instructions. Metronome BS is the one with Javi Martínez holding after 2012, if you ask me.

Shevchenko often played in a free striking role, roaming all over the pitch and attacking you from wide areas (Ronaldo often used wide areas as well). Inzaghi, Crespo or even Rebrov were more focal points of the attack, but Kaka used Shevchenko movement to attack central areas and score or to release him with his passing which was the beauty of that partnership. I mean, just look at the video and you will immediately see the similarity in the way Ronaldo attacked.
I didn't disagree with your point re Kaká and Sheva, disagreed peak Ronaldo played like him (nor did he play like Inzaghi, Crespo or Rebrov). He was streets ahead any of them.

The fact that Inter was absolute garbage so Ronaldo had to also play as number 10 at times or even deeper is another matter. The way you went about it here sounds like Zico and Ronaldo wouldn't be able to play together.
Zico is a very different and more complete/nuanced player than Kaká. I didn't say they won't work anyway, just that I have a feeling they don't add to the sum of parts. Yes, Ronaldo could play like Sheva and that would be perfect for Kaká... but then, you are not getting the full Ronaldo and may as well just have Shevchenko there. See my point?

The person who saw this being 0-0 draw was probably mostly right.
Agree, and that's where Buffon evidently guarantees a clean sheet far more than Ravelli does. If it went to penalties then all bets are off, Ravelli wasn't David "the traffic cone" De Gea at penos.
 
Last edited:
There's a good case for that, most arguments are a complete waste of time. I can see Moby doing that :lol:

yeah, i dont mind that route(did it myself few times as well) but when you lose you cant complain IMO
Arguments are a bit of waste time as everyone will stick to their opinion no matter what but as a neutral i like to read them tbh, even if its a dumb topic.
 
I didn't disagree with your point re Kaká and Sheva, disagreed peak Ronaldo played like him (nor did he play like Inzaghi, Crespo or Rebrov). He was streets ahead any of them.

I didn't say they won't work anyway, just that I have a feeling they don't add to the sum of parts. Yes, Ronaldo could play like Sheva and that would be perfect for Kaká... but then, you are not getting the full Ronaldo and may as well just have Shevchenko there. See my point?

Of course Ronaldo is streets ahead any of those strikers.

I just see Ronaldo like Shevchenko on steroids and more. Don't see anything he would have to change in his game considering Sheva loved that free roaming striker role also.

In any case, I will leave it here. We obviously see that duo dynamics differently.
 
Stumbled upon something, so have to share it! I even forgot about the nickname.

Lobanovskyi perhaps understood the sport of soccer -- why it is, how it works, what you can control -- on a deeper level than anyone ... ever. And so it is with much delight that I tell you his nickname for Andriy Shevchenko: the White Ronaldo.

So, the White Ronaldo, huh? I get it, in a way. What made Ronaldo so brilliant was his consistency -- not just in how he never stopped scoring goals but in how he was able to stress the defense in every phase of the game: running at defenders, running in behind, cutting in from the wing, getting on the end of a cross, you name it. The positional intelligence combined with the size and the speed and the control compelled him to dominate. That was all true for Shevchenko, too -- just to a lesser extent. However, part of what made Ronaldo such a romantic figure -- on a level the Ukrainian never achieved -- was that injuries cut his career short but more than that it’s that he dominated you with moves and footwork you’d typically only see in a pickup game. He made all that playful stuff double as deadly.
 
You are banging about not being peak BS of 1 year later when the other side is relying on 94' - 97' version of a player in the most crucial position on the pitch. Pretty much slow and immobile version of him as been mentioned above (and I didn’t rate his off ball movement even before, feck he got relegated with Brescia just 2 seasons prior). That version of Hagi spent 2 seasons on the bench in Barcelona with grand total of 36 league games in 2 years being a flop. And you are telling me that exact version of a player will hit his top level or that 2010 - 2012 version of Bastian wouldn't stop him? There was also instruction about Bastian being in a more reserved role behind...

Didn't even realize this about Hagi. For such their main creative player, I could just nail this on the game, then there wouldn't be any contest.
 
Didn't even realize this about Hagi. For such their main creative player, I could just nail this on the game, then there wouldn't be any contest.
Think the contest is long nailed mate :lol:

Sure as hell you wouldn't want to be playing late 80s Hagi here, but the 30+ Hagi at Galatasaray would still give you nightmares. Class and spunk are permanent.
 
Think the contest is long nailed mate :lol:

Sure as hell you wouldn't want to be playing late 80s Hagi here, but the 30+ Hagi at Galatasaray would still give you nightmares. Class and spunk are permanent.

He's class with Romania throughout his career. So yeah, I was just too harsh with this "no contest" stuff.
 
Last edited:
Stumbled upon something, so have to share it! I even forgot about the nickname.
Whose quote is this?

Lobanovsky hated Ronaldo by the way, he thought that he was everything that's wrong with football :lol: I'd be very surprised if he had actually called Sheva that.
 
Think the contest is long nailed mate :lol:

Sure as hell you wouldn't want to be playing late 80s Hagi here, but the 30+ Hagi at Galatasaray would still give you nightmares. Class and spunk are permanent.

Especially given the system was set up to totally accommodate him and includes his wonderful WC showing.

Seems odd to dig him out when there's the likes of Rijkaard playing at CB and two right footers playing on the left across the other side. Bastian and Viera were both better B2B so there's no real 6 though the middle.
 
Whose quote is this?
Lobanovsky hated Ronaldo by the way, he thought that he was everything that's wrong with football :lol: I'd be very surprised if he had actually called Sheva that.

Really? :lol: Can't find now above mentioned article, but I know he definitely had that nickname and apparently it came from Lobanovsky according to numerous sources. Tbf, he thought Sheva was more complete...:wenger:

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2005/feb/20/championsleague1

By the time Shevchenko was 20, Lobanovsky nicknamed his protégé 'The White Ronaldo' before adding that his boy was a more complete player than the Brazilian.

https://thesefootballtimes.co/2015/11/30/in-celebration-of-andriy-shevchenko-ukraines-great-hero/

Shevchenko finished as the tournament’s joint top scorer with eight strikes and, with his reputation solidified, moved to AC Milan for the princely sum of £26 million, being hailed by Lobanovskyi as “the white Ronaldo” in doing so.
 
Really? :lol: Can't find now above mentioned article, but I know he definitely had that nickname and apparently it came from Lobanovsky according to numerous sources. Tbf, he thought Sheva was more complete...:wenger:

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2005/feb/20/championsleague1



https://thesefootballtimes.co/2015/11/30/in-celebration-of-andriy-shevchenko-ukraines-great-hero/
Oh, I know about the nickname, but I very much doubt that it came from Lobanovsky. Sounds very sketchy as I can’t find anything in Russian, which is a bit weird. Plus, this doesn’t sound like Lobanovsky at all (as well as the “white” thing, I feel like it’s usually a British thing with white Pelés, Zicos and whatnot. It would be the Ukrainian Ronaldo if that originated from Ukraine, and I still doubt that Lo. The Independent called him that in 1998 though...

He did consider him to be a better player than Brazilian & told Sheva himself that multiple times.

As for Ronaldo, he was very harsh on him usually, saying that players like him just exploit their talents and football gets nothing from them. And also said that Ronaldo wouldn’t even start for the reserve team under him. It sounded insanely harsh at the time, but, seeing how Ronaldo’s career went, you kinda see his point, even though it was way too dramatically worded.
 
Yeah, if you try and search it, you will find tons of articles which claim it came from Lobanovsky, but there is no direct quote or something which would confirm it.

And also said that Ronaldo wouldn’t even start for the reserve team under him.

Am a bit like him then! :drool:
 
What a game!

@TheReligion has a perfect dream defence but @Isotope has a wonderful attack/defence so I would have also voted for Iso

Good to see Kaka and Donadoni winning this but I would have said the same if Hagi and Weah made it.
 
What a game!

@TheReligion has a perfect dream defence but @Isotope has a wonderful attack/defence so I would have also voted for Iso

Good to see Kaka and Donadoni winning this but I would have said the same if Hagi and Weah made it.

Thanks, man. Good to see you back. Always nice to see your creative formation.
 
First final in a loooong time to top 100 replies?
Really? half of those were just my low quality posts, trashing TR's players.

Reading previous Draft Finals, there were posts full of stats and wall of text. Incredibly prepared posts.