Eriku
Full Member
Haaland, Ødegaard, Kygo and Ole the most famous right now?
I’d add Carlsen.
Haaland, Ødegaard, Kygo and Ole the most famous right now?
I’d add Carlsen.
Friendlies and matches in the Sao Paolo regional series (Santos scored 143 goals in the 1958 season and 151 goals in the 1959 season in 38 games seasons in the Paulista). He played in one of the the best teams in the world in a league of 3-4 good teams with the rest being championship, league one and league two quality. It’s not even remotely comparable to football in the top leagues in Europe today. In official matches Pele never scored more than 75 goals (66 Santos and 9 Brazil) in a season and he played for a superdominant team that scored almost 4 goals on average per game. What he did in his 600+ friendly exhibition matches means zip.In 1959, when Pele was 18-19 years old (the year after he became a world champion at age 17), he scored 127 goals in a calendar year.
That year he scored against European champions Real Madrid, Barcelona, Valencia, Inter Milan, Feyenoord, Sporting Lisbon, and Hamburg. At one point he played 22 games in Europe in the space of a little more than a month. No substitutes, heavy boots, heavy balls, bad pitches, no protection from hatchet men by referees.
Haaland is on 20 goals right now.
But the thing is Pele wasn't an out and out poacher like Erling. He was an attacking mid/second striker. Now that's insane
Yeah.
Though I would add that Norwegians probably overestimate the number of people, worldwide, who give enough of a feck about chess to recognize Carlsen.
Wouldent Jens Stoltenberg be high?
And Munch if dead painters count.
Yeah.
Though I would add that Norwegians probably overestimate the number of people, worldwide, who give enough of a feck about chess to recognize Carlsen.
But chess is very popular in India
Yeah.
Though I would add that Norwegians probably overestimate the number of people, worldwide, who give enough of a feck about chess to recognize Carlsen.
Could be that he managed them for 9 years and won some LaLiga tiltes and a CL ….He's still a Barcalona legend why? Okay they won their 1st la liga title in 14 years when he joined but what else did he do?
I lived in Odense in Denmark for two years and Tromsø in Norway for seven months and have never heard of Carlsen. In fact I read it as “Carlsberg” first time round.
True.
(Actually, I just said that because it sounds plausible. I have no idea how popular it is in India. But that would - obviously - be a huge factor. Again - see the CR7/social media followers discussion. I can tell you this, though: I recently tried to reference Magnus Carlsen - as an example of something...I don't remember what it was, actually - and it failed massively, because most of the people in the room didn't know who I was talking about.)
I trust the non norwegian people on this.
How about A-ha? Quisling?
Is it? I'm not sure I'd take Haaland over Benzema last season or Lewandowski the two seasons before. Nor would I take him ahead of ~2015 Suarez. I mean, we've seen Haaland and Lewandowski playing in the same league and most followers of the Bundesliga will confirm you that Lewandowski was still ahead of him. Even most die hard Dortmund fans did.
True, but Carlsen’s reached a level where he makes global news occasionally, and has been signed by huge brands for marketing, including the likes of Nike and Porsche. I reckon it’s fair to put his name in there, but who knows in terms of actual recognition, I guess.
Yes, I mean - he is known on a global scale.
On that note, I suppose we should also consider the black metal thing: I have met people from all corners of the world who a) would have zero idea who Carlsen is, b) have zero idea that Stoltenberg is the GS of NATO, c) have no idea who painted Scream and d) who very likely don't know either Ole or Haaland...but who are very familiar with Varg Vikernes (or whatever he calls himself these days).
A-ha definitely - but only really for “Take On Me”.
Call him by his Christian name though: Kristian.
It was mostly pathetically bad, you would need to go down a few divisions to see defending that bad now. Defenders going to ground or just sticking a foot in all the time is pretty ppiss poor defending.It wasn't. Were Moore and Beckenbauer etc poor defenders? Of course not. Defensive organisation is better now but that is offset by the fact that if you even breathe on someone, you get sent off. It's swings and roundabouts.
Not really the word I'd use although he'd probably take it as an insult so that's good.Man’s progressive af
Firestone is a proper banger.And I had never even heard the name 'Kygo' before.
Yes I would have this version of Haaland over anyone else, including those mentioned in your list.
Apparently Lewandowski 2-3 years back was a great striker too, Ballon D'or level. Suarez on 2015 was also something else, same goes to Benzema last season.
But I think Haaland this season still have far better scoring ratio than those three at their absolute peak, even they did score impressively high no. of goals.
Haaland 22-23: 47 goals in 3075 mins (avg 1 goals per 65 mins)
Lewandowksi 19-20: 55 goals in 4133 mins (avg 1 goal per 75 mins)
Suarez 15-16: 59 goals in 4766 mins (avg 1 goal per 80 mins)
Benzema 21-22: 44 goals in 3915 mins (avg 1 goal per 89 mins)
And no its just not about scoring ratio. I personally rated Haaland pace/strength/physicality higher than Lewandowski's efficiency/positional sense, or Suarez aggressiveness/technical ability, or even Benzema all-roundness in attack, as I just find the way Haaland bullying defenders with his physicality more unstoppable than anything else I've seen from those other strikers.
Of course I know its all subjective and you might not agree, but that's just my preference.
The Brazilian state leagues were the best in the world at that time. So yes, it is comparable. Please explain, logically, why it is not?Friendlies and matches in the Sao Paolo regional series (Santos scored 143 goals in the 1958 season and 151 goals in the 1959 season in 38 games seasons in the Paulista). He played in one of the the best teams in the world in a league of 3-4 good teams with the rest being championship, league one and league two quality. It’s not even remotely comparable to football in the top leagues in Europe today. In official matches Pele never scored more than 75 goals (66 Santos and 9 Brazil) in a season and he played for a superdominant team that scored almost 4 goals on average per game. What he did in his 600+ friendly exhibition matches means zip.
Remarkable player at his time, but his achievements on the pitch isn’t comparable to todays football. The 1958 world Champions would lose comfortably to 2023 Watford or Bristol City. The evolvement of the sport has been enormous.
Let’s see what Haaland achieves in his career and evaluate then where he belongs among the greats. So far he’s doing things we haven’t seen in modern football and is far ahead of the likes of Messi and Ronaldo at the same age on goals/minute.
Nonsense. Take any player now and look at their top dribbles and look at the defenders. How exactly are they doing better?It was mostly pathetically bad, you would need to go down a few divisions to see defending that bad now. Defenders going to ground or just sticking a foot in all the time is pretty ppiss poor defending.
I'm watching Pele's top 30 dribbles and the defending is similar to a school yard.
A different level of bragging, perhaps..I really enjoy football, but people watching 50 black and white matches of Pele are on a whole different level I tried watching a few of the 1974 world cup matches of that Orange side, but gave up about 3 minutes in.
Defenders now have far better positioning, and stay on their feet more, its a lot harder to dribble past defenders now than before. Watching this top 30 dribbles, they don't even get basic positioning and how to make it hard for players to get past you, it was a time of just going for tackles. Defending was so poor back then, just watch the video yourself its comes up towards the top of YT.Nonsense. Take any player now and look at their top dribbles and look at the defenders. How exactly are they doing better?
Yeah makes sense, the painting is probably way more famous/recognized than Munch himself.Stoltenberg: Yeah...in theory. But even back in the day (before people were turned into goldfish by the Interwebz), the SG of NATO was hardly someone you could expect a random fecker on the street to name.
Munch: Clearly more famous than Stoltenberg. However...a considerable percentage of the people who would recognize Scream would not be able to tell you who painted it.
Yes I would have this version of Haaland over anyone else, including those mentioned in your list.
Apparently Lewandowski 2-3 years back was a great striker too, Ballon D'or level. Suarez on 2015 was also something else, same goes to Benzema last season.
But I think Haaland this season still have far better scoring ratio than those three at their absolute peak, even they did score impressively high no. of goals.
Haaland 22-23: 47 goals in 3075 mins (avg 1 goals per 65 mins)
Lewandowksi 19-20: 55 goals in 4133 mins (avg 1 goal per 75 mins)
Suarez 15-16: 59 goals in 4766 mins (avg 1 goal per 80 mins)
Benzema 21-22: 44 goals in 3915 mins (avg 1 goal per 89 mins)
And no its just not about scoring ratio. I personally rated Haaland pace/strength/physicality higher than Lewandowski's efficiency/positional sense, or Suarez aggressiveness/technical ability, or even Benzema all-roundness in attack, as I just find the way Haaland bullying defenders with his physicality more unstoppable than anything else I've seen from those other strikers.
Of course I know its all subjective and you might not agree, but that's just my preference.
It was mostly pathetically bad, you would need to go down a few divisions to see defending that bad now. Defenders going to ground or just sticking a foot in all the time is pretty ppiss poor defending.
I'm watching Pele's top 30 dribbles and the defending is similar to a school yard.
Friendlies and matches in the Sao Paolo regional series (Santos scored 143 goals in the 1958 season and 151 goals in the 1959 season in 38 games seasons in the Paulista). He played in one of the the best teams in the world in a league of 3-4 good teams with the rest being championship, league one and league two quality. It’s not even remotely comparable to football in the top leagues in Europe today. In official matches Pele never scored more than 75 goals (66 Santos and 9 Brazil) in a season and he played for a superdominant team that scored almost 4 goals on average per game. What he did in his 600+ friendly exhibition matches means zip.
Remarkable player at his time, but his achievements on the pitch isn’t comparable to todays football. The 1958 world Champions would lose comfortably to 2023 Watford or Bristol City. The evolvement of the sport has been enormous.
Let’s see what Haaland achieves in his career and evaluate then where he belongs among the greats. So far he’s doing things we haven’t seen in modern football and is far ahead of the likes of Messi and Ronaldo at the same age on goals/minute.
Defenders now have far better positioning, and stay on their feet more, its a lot harder to dribble past defenders now than before. Watching this top 30 dribbles, they don't even get basic positioning and how to make it hard for players to get past you, it was a time of just going for tackles. Defending was so poor back then, just watch the video yourself its comes up towards the top of YT.
Wow you really went hard into a strawman argument, no one said that and I will not even bother giving it a proper response.Using your logic there is absolutely no way you can argue for George Best or Bobby Charlton being Uniteds best players, if you’re going to chastise players for playing in the era they did then make it appropriate for everybody.
Wow you really went hard into a strawman argument, no one said that and I will not even bother giving it a proper response.
Except why do he need all those stats you've listed above though?Since you're so into stats, let's do a little statistical comparison between Haaland 22/23, Benzema 21/22 and Lewandowski 19/20:
Haaland is among the...
worst 6% strikers in touches (Benzema best 5%, Lewandowski best 26%)
worst 19% in completed passes (Benzema best 4%, Lewandowski best 21%)
best 47% in progressive passes received (Benzema best 7%, Lewandowski best 14%)
best 47% in progressive passes (Benzema best 4%, Lewandowski best 12%)
worst 1% in carries into the final third (Benzema best 7%, Lewandowski best 28%)
best 45% in carries into the penalty area (Benzema best 7%, Lewandowski best 6%)
worst 8% in dribblings completed (Benzema best 45%, Lewandowski best 19%)
worst 42% in shot creating actions (Benzema best 1%, Lewandowski best 14%)
Lewandowski still is streets ahead of Haaland in terms of overall contribution although he himself is not in the same ball park to Benzema. Haaland on the other hand is average in those areas, especially considering these stats are from a season in which he played for the most dominant team in possession in world football.
I've said this before, I'm sure, but:
Players who stand out as transcending (in one way or another) the often much more rigid systems used by teams back in the day tend to be glorified.
To a degree this is deserved: there was a reason why they transcended the system, it had something to do with their talent.
But one has to be careful when assessing such players, specifically when comparing them directly with players whose peak came half a century later.
Di Stefano is perhaps not a great example of this (there are other cases that are much more obvious ), but it's worth keeping in mind with regard to him too.
This makes no sense. In the world cup for example, the number of goals per match has been basically the same for about 60 years, hovering around the 2.5-3 goals per game mark. If defending was so poor back then, why were there not lots more goals?Defenders now have far better positioning, and stay on their feet more, its a lot harder to dribble past defenders now than before. Watching this top 30 dribbles, they don't even get basic positioning and how to make it hard for players to get past you, it was a time of just going for tackles. Defending was so poor back then, just watch the video yourself its comes up towards the top of YT.
last i heard of him he'd escaped jail and tried to enroll in the french foreign legion. Not sure of true but it was funnyFair point
Call him by his Christian name though: Kristian.
Just looked him up, actually. Man’s progressive af, took his wife’s name. He is now Louis Cachet
I’ll be brutally honest, I am a huge Lene Marlin fan and I used my post as a flimsy excuse to reference her to someone who might actually know who she is…
But yeah, Ole is way more famous. Aurora is making waves too. Haaland is the most famous Norgi I’d say.
I don't think he escaped, he just served his sentence.last i heard of him he'd escaped jail and tried to enroll in the french foreign legion. Not sure of true but it was funny
please please please tell me he's a born again christian now