Wilt
Full Member
- Joined
- May 22, 2017
- Messages
- 7,834
fair enoughNah I’m ugly too.
fair enoughNah I’m ugly too.
He’s not quite Franck Ribery levels though.Such an ugly cnut. Hope someone decks him.
He looks a lot like a young Vigo the Carpathian from Ghostbusters 2.
Shades of Uma Thurman here and she’s beautiful
He will one day star in a Viking film, you heard it here first.
Very few non-norwegians, old or young, would know names like Henie, Heyerdahl, Amundsen, Nansen, Ullmann.You've also got the whole old Soviet bloc. Chess is extremely popular, but not very Western.
Munch has been mentioned, there's also Ibsen and Grieg. Thor Heyerdahl. All of these should win out, I'd think, though not on Redcafe or among young people. The polar expedition guys as maybes: Roald Amundsen and Fridtjof Nansen. Possibly Sonja Henie and Liv Ullmann. Knut Hamsun. Norwegians like to claim Roald Dahl, but he's a Brit. All of these except Ullmann are dead, and she's 84, so Haaland and probably Ole would crush the youth vote. I don't know who could compete on that front, maybe Kygo or Alan Walker.
Very few non-norwegians, old or young, would know names like Henie, Heyerdahl, Amundsen, Nansen, Ullmann.
Some polar expedition guys doing their stuff from 1880-1920, Henie who was figure skating in the 1920s-30s, Heyerdahl on a balsa raft 75 years ago, Ullman who acted in some Swedish movies in the 60s/70s. Unless you have a very specific interest in one of the topics, you'll be clueless.
Bro, can you please not be basic for one day?! The game was won in the first leg.Does tonight kinda address the people who talk about "the goalscorer is only the last person to touch the ball, not necessarily the most important" you can create as many chances as you want but all the key passes, or pre assists or whatever are useless without someone to finish them. And that's why haaland's scoring rate is much more important than whatever other metrics other strikers beat him in
Bro, can you please not be basic for one day?! The game was won in the first leg.
Does tonight kinda address the people who talk about "the goalscorer is only the last person to touch the ball, not necessarily the most important" you can create as many chances as you want but all the key passes, or pre assists or whatever are useless without someone to finish them. And that's why haaland's scoring rate is much more important than whatever other metrics other strikers beat him in
If I have a choice between peak Maradona and Haaland, I'm taking Maradona. You can have Haaland if you want.The point still stands, that you can create as much as you want but the goals are far more important than any other metric, you can have a goal without an assist but not vice versa. What does the game being won in the first leg have to do with scoring goals being clearly the most important metric? This game is just an example of that
If I have a choice between peak Maradona and Haaland, I'm taking Maradona. You can have Haaland if you want.
I'll bear that in mind....He doesn't understand football. So take it easy on him.
Does tonight kinda address the people who talk about "the goalscorer is only the last person to touch the ball, not necessarily the most important" you can create as many chances as you want but all the key passes, or pre assists or whatever are useless without someone to finish them. And that's why haaland's scoring rate is much more important than whatever other metrics other strikers beat him in
If I have a choice between peak Maradona and Haaland, I'm taking Maradona. You can have Haaland if you want.
Who talked about haaland vs Maradona, wasn't the discussion about him not creating as much as benzema or lewandowski or suarez or whoever or were those codewords for Maradona, who I don't believe played as a striker and therefore wasn't involved in the comparison that I was talking about
You do know Suarez scored 40 goals in 35 La Liga games at his best right?
Haaland might be a better goalscorer, but i wouldn't swap an extra 5-10 goals for all the things Suarez brought to the table outside of scoring goals, dribbling pressing, and creating for others also.
And thats why Haaland is the player every top club wish they had right now.The point still stands, that you can create as much as you want but the goals are far more important than any other metric, you can have a goal without an assist but not vice versa. What does the game being won in the first leg have to do with scoring goals being clearly the most important metric? This game is just an example of that
Its a forum. Opinions very. "he doesnt know football" and "you probably never played football"He doesn't understand football. So take it easy on him.
Not sure about Henie, Nansen and Ullmann, but of course everyone who studied at school knows Heyerdahl and AmundsenVery few non-norwegians, old or young, would know names like Henie, Heyerdahl, Amundsen, Nansen, Ullmann.
I doubt he approaches Messi's all time record of 73 goals in a season but would be fun to see him get to within single digits). 62 could be a great target to end up with the 2nd highest goalscoring peak in the modern era.
If I have a choice between peak Maradona and Haaland, I'm taking Maradona. You can have Haaland if you want.
I never compared him to any of those players, I've seen an Mbappe comparison and that's it. I brought up Maradona (works just as well with Zidane or Cruyff or numerous other greats) because of this whole insane point you made about 'it doesn't matter how many chances you create if someone doesn't put the ball in the back of the net, therefore the goal poacher is automatically always the most important person on the pitch, QED ' and claimed this game as evidence when it is a tie that City won 4-1 with EH scoring the 3 and 4th goals of the tie. So basically they would have won even if he hadn't scored. I just don't get how people can't see that everything in football matches is connected?Who talked about haaland vs Maradona, wasn't the discussion about him not creating as much as benzema or lewandowski or suarez or whoever or were those codewords for Maradona, who I don't believe played as a striker and therefore wasn't involved in the comparison that I was talking about
Point missed by a wide marginAh yes. Lets sign peak Maradona then.
It's kind of mad that he's put himself in a position now where you expect him to score 2 a game and if he doesn't it is a below par performance.
Welbeck > Baresi, you heard it here first.I value a goal scorer over anyone else.
I used to get asked a question- is a defender better footballer than a striker?
No a striker is a better footballer than a defender because a clean sheet doesn’t win you matches, goals do.