NonceUponATimeInEpsteinAndAndyLand

Andrew is not the sharpest tool in the box, is he? Sending an email to Maxwell not just saying “can we talk?” but instead specifying that he needed to talk about Virginia Roberts.
 
What did you make of the Dershowitz email?
 
2cents said:
What did you make of the Dershowitz email?
Click to expand...

Not seen the interview, what is the email? Regardless. he's been mixed up with this for ages. Was in the flight logs to the island, his paper-thin excuses for that don't hold up to scrutiny, was Epstein's lawyer, helped him get around Harvard and contact others, and negotiated a deal for Epstein which kept himself out of reach of the law.
 
Oh, and he also wrote some weird editorials about age-of-consent laws.
 
berbatrick said:
Not seen the interview, what is the email? Regardless. he's been mixed up with this for ages. Was in the flight logs to the island, his paper-thin excuses for that don't hold up to scrutiny, was Epstein's lawyer, helped him get around Harvard and contact others, and negotiated a deal for Epstein which kept himself out of reach of the law.
Click to expand...

It was an email sent to his accuser by her publicist (I think?) which seemed to suggest Dershowitz to her as a good addition to the story. Or at least that’s one interpretation of it. No context given.
 
berbatrick said:
Not seen the interview, what is the email? Regardless. he's been mixed up with this for ages. Was in the flight logs to the island, his paper-thin excuses for that don't hold up to scrutiny, was Epstein's lawyer, helped him get around Harvard and contact others, and negotiated a deal for Epstein which kept himself out of reach of the law.
Click to expand...

I don’t know if it’s what @2cents is referencing but Virginia R-G has implicated Dersch and her lawyer (I think) has said that he thinks there’s enough evidence against Dersch now to implicate him in a crime and render his privileged communications with Epstein as fair play for discovery.
 
This is the email in question:

EByYC7dWsAAcu00
 
Nothing really new in last nights Panorama except 5 girls want Andy to testify about the goings on at Epstein's properties. Will he go to the states? The press will have a field day either way but I suspect the fallout will be less if he does choose to give evidence. If he's guilty he can lie through his teeth and the powers that be will take part in the greatest cover up since Anthony Blunt and if he's innocent he has nothing to worry about.

I suppose he could refuse to go on the grounds that the evidence against him is so flimsy that he feels it not worthy of him drawing breath to responding to these ridiculously trumped up charges.
 
blue blue said:
Nothing really new in last nights Panorama except 5 girls want Andy to testify about the goings on at Epstein's properties. Will he go to the states? The press will have a field day either way but I suspect the fallout will be less if he does choose to give evidence. If he's guilty he can lie through his teeth and the powers that be will take part in the greatest cover up since Anthony Blunt and if he's innocent he has nothing to worry about.

I suppose he could refuse to go on the grounds that the evidence against him is so flimsy that he feels it not worthy of him drawing breath to responding to these ridiculously trumped up charges.
Click to expand...


But why does he need to go to the States. Why could the investigators not come here.
 
Buster15 said:
But why does he need to go to the States. Why could the investigators not come here.
Click to expand...
They possibly will but seeing as I'm not an expert I really don't know.

PS. The Peter Cook video is one of my all time favourite comedy sketches.
 
Last edited:
Adisa said:
These people think we are mugs.
Click to expand...

Actually they don't care who we are. They do it, say didn't even if they know we know just for formalities and the world keep spinning
 
blue blue said:
They possibly will but seeing as I'm not an expert I really don't know.

PS. The Peter Cook video is one of my all time favourite comedy sketches.
Click to expand...

Parody of the judges summing up in the Thorpe/Scott conspiracy to murder trial wasn't it?
 
Wibble said:
Parody of the judges summing up in the Thorpe/Scott conspiracy to murder trial wasn't it?
Click to expand...
" I should now ask the jury to retire, as indeed should I, to consider their verdict of not guilty"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wibble
Penna said:
The Thorpe/Scott stuff would be interesting nowadays, with t'internet.
Click to expand...
Eh oop lad! Nowt like chewing t'cud about early 70's political scandals. Some of them were keen on chewing pillows if I remember rightly!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wibble
Bumping this thread to the top just so people don’t forget what an odious inbred tw@t Prince Andrew really is.
 
The publicity for Pizza Hut, though. If you had to monetize this publicity, I wonder how much it'd be worth.
 
No matter if you’re a royal or rapist, you’re always welcome at Pizza Hut. Extra jalapeños on mine!
 
Rams said:
No matter if you’re a royal and rapist, you’re always welcome at Pizza Hut. Extra jalapeños on mine!
Click to expand...

Fixed. I mean, I don't know why you make them exclusive in this context
 
Rams said:
I’m not a man of violence and I really hope nothing untoward happens to his royal highness.
Click to expand...
It’s mad that there aren’t more nutters taking things in to their own hands against these types and politicians, especially with how heated it all is these days
 
You must log in or register to reply here.