Fake news, la.
NonceUponATimeInEpsteinAndAndyLand
- Thread starter langster
- Start date
Didn't her Dad die in a freak yachting accident?
‘Die’ being the operative word, if you put it in apostrophes.
A conspiracy of Spinal Tap proportions.
You were supposed to put it in apostrophes, FFS.
'Tap'.
Joe Biden supporters are the most gullible people alive
Hopefully the prosecutors are for real and they are continuing to follow leads in the case but you can't help but feel Barr will make sure they seize any further digging.
There were many other men involved with Epstein and his girls and the world wants to know who these men are, ALL of them. I’m expecting the DOJ to investigate this and prosecute them but with Trump/Barr controlling the DOJ this is unlikely to happen.
Nothing to see here, folks, move along.BBC said:
Pffft...that's just what they call lollypops in Mexico. His plane was called The Lollypop Express. Perfectly innocent.
Are you Alex Acosta?
give us a wave pogue
His fingers will be chubbier now than they were then because he’s fatter overall now.
The really lame bullshit coming out of this story is quite something.
From no staff watching Epstein, to 'unusable' CCTV, to bodged photoshops despite it obviously going to be analysed online, and now the excuse "I don't recall having that photo taken and my fingers look weird".
From no staff watching Epstein, to 'unusable' CCTV, to bodged photoshops despite it obviously going to be analysed online, and now the excuse "I don't recall having that photo taken and my fingers look weird".
He's innocent - It's merely a tribute to Ashley Cole's Roma photo.
Obviously. Fake? Come on!
Come on what? Merely stating the obvious.
I’ll let you off then. 
Those women who were allegedly involved with Prince Andy might do well to steer clear of driving through tunnels for a while. Dangerous places for females who get involved with British Prince's.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-jeffrey-epstein-cameras-idUSKCN1VI2LC
FBI studies two broken cameras outside cell where Epstein died: source
FBI studies two broken cameras outside cell where Epstein died: source
those documents will end up unfortunately burnt or accidentally on purpose 'misplaced'
No surprise to see Ronan Farrow with more excellent investigative journalism to add to his CV.
So that’s her bargaining chip is it?
The Jeffrey Epstein saga has a “John Doe” now.
An anonymous man on Tuesday urged a New York judge to permanently keep secret many of the remaining sealed documents in a defamation lawsuit filed by one of Epstein’s alleged victims, Virginia Giuffre, against the late money manager’s confidante, British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell.
The man doesn’t explain why he believes his name may appear in the documents, or in what context, but he fears his reputation may be damaged by “unproven allegations of impropriety.”
Hundreds of pages of sealed documents in the 2015 case were already made public by an appeals court on Aug. 9, revealing for the first time unsubstantiated claims that Epstein had sent Giuffre to have sex with well-known people when she was a girl, including former U.S. Senator George Mitchell and asset manager Glenn Dubin. The men denied the allegations.
Now, two subsets of additional sealed documents are due to be analyzed by a judge who’ll decide if they should also be made public. Doe said he hadn’t been notified that his name appears in the sealed documents. A hearing on the matter is set for Wednesday in federal court in Manhattan.
“As a non-party to these proceedings, Doe lacks specific knowledge about the contents of the sealed materials,” his lawyers wrote. “But it is clear that these materials implicate the privacy and reputational interests of many persons other than the two primary parties to this action, Giuffre and Maxwell.”
In her 2015 lawsuit, Giuffre claimed that Maxwell, daughter of the late British publisher Robert Maxwell, defamed her by publicly calling her a liar. She claims that Epstein sexually abused her for two years starting in 2000, when she was 16, and that Maxwell had recruited her and joined in the abuse.
Maxwell has long denied the allegations and settled the defamation case. She also fought unsuccessfully to stop any of the sealed documents from being made public. Less than 24 hours after the first set of documents was unsealed, Epstein killed himself in jail while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges.
While some women have publicly detailed their stories of sexual abuse and trafficking, others have remained anonymous as “Jane Does.”
Doe claims if the papers are unsealed, the judge should order the redaction of names and other identifying information of the non-parties to avoid sensationalist reporting by the media, who generally can’t be sued for printing what appears in court documents.
“Providing the media more unsubstantiated allegations, never leveled outside of the cloak of the litigation privilege, only serves to continue this cycle of irresponsible, sensationalist reporting,” Doe’s filing said.
The case is Giuffre v. Maxwell, 15-cv-07433, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).
An anonymous man on Tuesday urged a New York judge to permanently keep secret many of the remaining sealed documents in a defamation lawsuit filed by one of Epstein’s alleged victims, Virginia Giuffre, against the late money manager’s confidante, British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell.
The man doesn’t explain why he believes his name may appear in the documents, or in what context, but he fears his reputation may be damaged by “unproven allegations of impropriety.”
Hundreds of pages of sealed documents in the 2015 case were already made public by an appeals court on Aug. 9, revealing for the first time unsubstantiated claims that Epstein had sent Giuffre to have sex with well-known people when she was a girl, including former U.S. Senator George Mitchell and asset manager Glenn Dubin. The men denied the allegations.
Now, two subsets of additional sealed documents are due to be analyzed by a judge who’ll decide if they should also be made public. Doe said he hadn’t been notified that his name appears in the sealed documents. A hearing on the matter is set for Wednesday in federal court in Manhattan.
“As a non-party to these proceedings, Doe lacks specific knowledge about the contents of the sealed materials,” his lawyers wrote. “But it is clear that these materials implicate the privacy and reputational interests of many persons other than the two primary parties to this action, Giuffre and Maxwell.”
In her 2015 lawsuit, Giuffre claimed that Maxwell, daughter of the late British publisher Robert Maxwell, defamed her by publicly calling her a liar. She claims that Epstein sexually abused her for two years starting in 2000, when she was 16, and that Maxwell had recruited her and joined in the abuse.
Maxwell has long denied the allegations and settled the defamation case. She also fought unsuccessfully to stop any of the sealed documents from being made public. Less than 24 hours after the first set of documents was unsealed, Epstein killed himself in jail while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges.
While some women have publicly detailed their stories of sexual abuse and trafficking, others have remained anonymous as “Jane Does.”
Doe claims if the papers are unsealed, the judge should order the redaction of names and other identifying information of the non-parties to avoid sensationalist reporting by the media, who generally can’t be sued for printing what appears in court documents.
“Providing the media more unsubstantiated allegations, never leveled outside of the cloak of the litigation privilege, only serves to continue this cycle of irresponsible, sensationalist reporting,” Doe’s filing said.
The case is Giuffre v. Maxwell, 15-cv-07433, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...rganic&utm_content=business&utm_medium=social