glazed
Eats diamonds to beat thermodynamics
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2012
- Messages
- 8,439
This feels like a Woodward signing. Big name past his prime available on the cheap.
No, Kante has not been consistent and outside of a couple of great CL performances in 2021 has been poor and inconsistent. It's just not reported so people just assume he is great based off his past reputation and name.That last sentence, don’t be ridiculous. I’m going to assume it’s a joke?
If we sign Kante for name recognition value, then obviously nothing has changed with the club's philosophy and we will continue to fail. I'm fairly hopeful that they've finally realised this way isn't going to work though. If we sign Kante because ETH wants him and thinks he can do a job, then I'm fully behind it.Who says we're second guessing ETH? We know he doesn't have sole control over the transfers at this club, just a say in them. Which may well see him acquiescing to club signings he isn't overly keen on due to limited alternatives as presented to him by the club, as previous managers like LVG told us he had to. It doesn't follow that just because we're interested in or indeed sign a player that he was one ETH was overly keen on or that it's a reflection of what he actually wanted us to do in the transfer market.
You mention Perisic but we could equally point to Cavani, a player who was barely able to play due to injury issues in just his second season at the club and has added to our transfer issues this season as a result. A signing Rangnick reportedly pointed to as an example of the sort of short-sighted approach we shouldn't be taking in the transfer market.
These are the mistakes we were supposed to be learning from, yet some people seem keen to make them again for the sake of another aging injury-prone player with name recognition value.
This feels like a Woodward signing. Big name past his prime available on the cheap.
No way Chelsea let him go, surely? He's had some injuries and some struggles coming back from injuries, but I don't think that constitutes this "decline" a lot of people are going on about. People thought he was in decline a couple of years ago and he came back stronger than ever - I wouldn't bet against him doing it again.
Completely different physique on the two of them. Look at Modric at 36 who is much more similar physically to Kante.On one hand it's Kante, who has been one of the best at what he does for years.
On the other hand we bought Matic in similar circumstances at a younger age, with Chelsea fans saying he was on the decline, and while he had some good spells, we spent most of the time moaning that he didn't have the legs, and would have been better years before.
Completely different physique on the two of them. Look at Modric at 36 who is much more similar physically to Kante.
I’m not particularly for this move, but comparing to Matic seems wrong.
Is Kante at 31 past his peak? I think Ronaldo was past his peak from 28-36.Chelsea midfielder past his peak is the link.
Conte wasn't with Matic either at the timeTuchel isn’t to be fair
Conte wasn't with Matic either at the time
Is Kante at 31 past his peak? I think Ronaldo was past his peak from 28-36.
On the cheap? That's not Woodward's style.
Some people here would honestly give out about any signing. Outside the box signings are unproven, someone from a weaker league is a ‘hipster signing’ or ‘know it alls’ want him. And then the most decorated and proven midfielder we could possibly buy and he’s too old…
Peter Walton stuttering to make up this shit sound like the referee's decision is correct
Kante is on his way down as an all-action harasser and haranguer of the ball and opposing players - continually using him in this way will only hasten his injuries and degrade his output even more. He'll roll back the years and still have some performances Fred can only dream of per season, but they will not be the norm.
One of Ralf's issues was signing older players for short term gain...i have to agree with him and Kante would fall into that category.
Improving the United midfield isn't difficult, there is so many options which would improve the team. No need to take a risk on Kante imo.
RVP finished a full season uninjured and was still peakLike we did with Van Persie ?
He was also the best player and big match performer during a CL winning run just a year ago. Like I've said, we could do so so much worse than Kante this summer.He played more for Chelsea this season than mctominay did for us. The idea that he's washed up and utterly past it is ludicrous.
Anyone who watched United play Chelsea at Old Trafford last month surely saw he’s not finished as a player by any means.
I would expect Kante to have some special performances throughout a season, even in a state of decline. What you're looking at is how much longer can it continue and especially so going into a multi-year contract. We should know too well what haggared looks like when we get a class player who hasn't much left at the level he made his name off of. Kante may hold his level, but it could also plummet in terms of fitness/injuries into form, and there's no way to not factor that into what you're potentially getting for extremely high wages that we are bound to should he sign.Did you see him against Liverpool ? He was basically the same as he was the last 3-4 years. He did things in terms of pressing and harassing no player in our team is close to doing
I was there that night and despite my opinion of him as a player, I thought he was very, very good. Him and Reece James were the best players on the pitch. Though they weren't up against much and still failed to win.Anyone who watched United play Chelsea at Old Trafford last month surely saw he’s not finished as a player by any means.