N'Golo Kante

We should stay far far away from Kante. If hes already missing 60% of chelsea games this season, it will only get worse as he gets older. Plus i think midfielders who rely on their physical attributes i.e engine to get around the pitch, should be avoided once they get over 30. This would be like us signing a over the hill schweinsteiger or a injury prone hargreaves. Avoid.
 
KeanoMagicHat said:
Anyone who watched United play Chelsea at Old Trafford last month surely saw he’s not finished as a player by any means.
Click to expand...
This is very true, wasn’t till this game I realised how quick the lil fecker is across the grass. Sure he chased down Rashford at one point who had a head start on him. Maybe thats not saying much given Rashfords form this season.
 
It's strange that Kante struggled to find a single French club to take him when he was 20 years old. When Ian Wright interviewed Wenger a while ago, Wenger said he eventually found a club in French division 3 willing to give him a chance. 4 seasons later he had signed for Leicester
 
My only worry with him is the injuries he has started to pick up, wouldn't be against it if we could manage that properly.
 
I really hope we give it a swerve. Excellent player on his day, but reguarly injured how and his game is reliant on his physicality. Age 31 is not the time to sign him.
 
I don't see the point in it, it's a 3 year project to sort this squad out and Kante will be finished by then.
 
Andrew7582 said:
I don't see the point in it, it's a 3 year project to sort this squad out and Kante will be finished by then.
Click to expand...
Agree, one of the reasons we brought in ETH was his medium-long term vision. Having said that he knows he's under pressure to get top 4 next season so he may be trying to balance short term fixes with his long term goals.

If he was a free agent or something like that it would be a no brainer but giving significant funds to a rival for an injury prone player past his best that they're not fussed about losing feels like a mistake.
 
Last edited:
Dominos said:
Agree, one of the reasons we brought in ETH was his medium-long term vision. Having said that he knows he's under pressure to get top 4 next season so he may be trying to balance short term fixes with his long term goals.

If he was a fee agent or something like that it would be a no brainer but giving significant funds to a rival for an injury prone player past his best that they're not fussed about losing feels like a mistake.
Click to expand...

Agreed.
 
Lee565 said:
Complete waste of time and we need to stop being a feeder club for Chelsea's cast offs, would have thought we would have learned our lesson from how they underwhelmingly have turned out and are now both leaving for free.

Same will happen with kante, pay over the odds in transfer and wages for a player on a downward trajectory with injuries mounting up with each one just speeding up the process of him being a complete spent force and will have 0 re-sale value
Click to expand...

He isn't exactly a Chelsea cast-off. We are trying to extend his contract.
 
Unfortunately we're not in a position where we can rotate Kante's minutes because, how shall I put this, our rotation options are sh*te.

The drop off would be so big that everybody would be clamouring for Kante to play 99% of the time.

Put Kante into a squad beaming with quality like City, Liverpool or Real Madrid and you'd get away with it. For us at this moment ? hell no.
 
Didn't Tuchel say something like he was able to play only 40% of the games this season due to injuries?
We should stay clear of a 31yr old who primarily relies on physical attributes and has had a bad injury record off late.

Great player though, would've loved to have him 5 years ago.
 
kthanksbye said:
Didn't Tuchel say something like he was able to play only 40% of the games this season due to injuries?
We should stay clear of a 31yr old who primarily relies on physical attributes and has had a bad injury record off late.

Great player though, would've loved to have him 5 years ago.
Click to expand...
1777 minutes so about 1/2 of the PL minutes available. We can’t rely on that right now.
 
Kante signing this summer only makes sense if we sign him for free and give him 2 years contract. Chelsea ain't sell him for 0 penny or even 5m this summer, they would rather let him go for free next summer. So the idea of investing our money on Kante makes zero sense for the rebuilding project. Don't do the Matic signing again where we invested 40m and never sign a DM for the next 5 years since the board had this idea of signing for the next 5 years plan.
 
kthanksbye said:
Didn't Tuchel say something like he was able to play only 40% of the games this season due to injuries?
We should stay clear of a 31yr old who primarily relies on physical attributes and has had a bad injury record off late.

Great player though, would've loved to have him 5 years ago.
Click to expand...

Yep. And you could certainly argue we'd be more reliant on Kante than they are, in which case it would be a bigger issue again for us.

And it's not like we have a stellar ability to keep our players fit as is.
 
Yagami said:
Would you want to keep him as a starter?
Click to expand...

Not sure he's capable of playing 80-90% of all our games like he used to, so yeah if he was fit enough to be a starter I would have him as a starter. What's likelier is that Chelsea will be careful with his fitness and manage his work load carefully. Keep him fit for the important games and just bring him off the bench here and there in other games. We have Jorginho, Kovacic and a returning Gallagher to cover for him.
 
UNITED ACADEMY said:
Kante signing this summer only makes sense if we sign him for free and give him 2 years contract. Chelsea ain't sell him for 0 penny or even 5m this summer, they would rather let him go for free next summer. So the idea of investing our money on Kante makes zero sense for the rebuilding project. Don't do the Matic signing again where we invested 40m and never sign a DM for the next 5 years since the board had this idea of signing for the next 5 years plan.
Click to expand...

This is a correct summary about this signing.
While chelsea get a promising young DM we will continue with Kante and him missing most of the matches with injuries.
 
Kante: Inury prone, declining and old. Typical United
FDJ: Marquee, Expensive, doesnt want to come. Years since he was really good. Typical United.

Cant see a change tbh. Its just the same old bs. None of these players required good scouting either. Why cant we find better suited, up and coming and more motivated players ?
 
Some posts from a Chelsea forum to see their take:

It’s probably the first time I’d consider selling Kante if anyone comes in with a big offer. He quite clearly have declined sadly, it feels like it is becoming less and less frequent to see him at his best.

I wouldn’t mind keeping him as a squad player and save him for big games but if someone comes in with a 60m offer, that’ll be difficult to turn down imo.
Click to expand...

It's a dilemma with our great N'Golo because he's capable of reaching levels almost any midfielder would be envious of. But for the last few years he's only reached those levels for a limited run of games, for example in the Champions League last season. But for a league campaign you have got to the point where you can't really rely on him to 1, stay fit, and 2, be consistently at the top of his game.

And with that in mind you definitly got a decision to make when he's got a year left on his contract. He's our highest paid player with Lukaku and we pay him about £15 million every year which is a lot. Considering he's 31 now and showing signs of decline I would be vary of offering him a new long-term contract at this point. And if we don't we will need to sell him this summer so we can spend those funds on a rebuild.
Click to expand...

If we get a big offer outside the premier league we should consider it but if Man Utd come in no chance.
Click to expand...

The last 2-3 years we have seen his body adjust .. we have used him in different roles.. Sarri tried to make him an AM and played him to the ground .. probably also started his hamstring issues

lamps tried him in the pivot and conte was handed a generally half for Kante …

At 31 he is fairly young for a mid fielder and easily has 2-3 years left. I think we should give him an extension and let him rest in the off season and come back the monster he can be.
Click to expand...

Personally, I think we need to keep Kante, at least for another season. There is already huge disruption, and basically a new back line. Dont think we can risk Kante also going at the same time as that.

Yes, he has made mistakes that have cost us games/results and a place in the champions league final...

...but he is still Ngolo. He is NOT one of our biggest headaches, so we should choose our battles.
Click to expand...

I'm not saying we should sell him, but I'm finding it harder to argue with those that think we should. Trying to get Kante fit every season is hurting us. We can't get a settled midfield and constantly trying to get Kante back up to match fitness is hurting our performances and results. He's not even performing well in the big games anymore, games where he used to be the best player on the pitch even at 50% fitness.

There hasn't been a single moment all season where I would have preferred Kante over Kovacic. This isn't a knock at Kovacic, a player who I think has gone up a level in the past 2 seasons, but Kovacic at his best is still a level below Kante at his best. But the more we hold on to the hope that world class Kante will return, the longer it will take for our midfield to find any consistency.
Click to expand...

From the perspective of the money men, you can't pay a guy nearly 300 grand a week and only get 50 odd percent playing time in return.
Click to expand...

It’s very hard to see Kante rediscovering his best form so I think it would be wise to sell him if we get a huge offer. But if he rediscovers his form… that would be painful to watch.
Click to expand...

I am in two minds with it. The guy is our highest paid player and is not a consistent starter. He is also going to be 32 next season and with his injuries, is it worth keeping a player on the books when we could free up those wages and spend towards other players wages and new signings? We have Gallagher who while doesn't offer the defensive security Kante does, offers same energy and better goal threat. And if we decide to buy another CM, who is younger and even better on the ball, I would not be so against it. I wouldn't say I regret any of the players we sold to United in hindsight (Mata and Matic).

If the fee was around £50m (I doubt), then I think it would be worth considering to fund for another player
Click to expand...

If he does indeed sign with Utd, I can only give him praise for his time with us winning everything.

He likely has a year or 2 at best with his playstyle
Click to expand...

Absolutely not, under any circumstances.

We're already short on numbers in midfield, we're already losing years of experience out of the defence, and what a horrible symbolic first move it would be for the Boehly era.

Why on earth would you sell your best player (and probably best person) to a direct rival? Especially when it would strengthen them in a position in which they are hilariously weak. Complete madness.
Click to expand...

He’s categorically in a decline now but yes it wouldn’t be a good ‘symbolic’ move for the new era to let him go.
I’m not sure how credible the rumour to United is though as it reeks of an Ed Woodward signing and he’s long gone, in fact they’re shaking up their whole recruitment system. It’s Matic all over again and it would ultimately be a good move after his initial first season.
Click to expand...

The Kante question shouldn't be one about quality in my opinion. We know he's quality. Although often struggles when team sit deep as so many others in our team.

The question is if we should extend a soon 32 year old and injury prone midfielder who's missed more and more games for us over the last two-three seasons. To win the league you need players you can depend on (JT wouldn't have been JT if he played 4 out of 10 games etc) and Kante is at the point where he is unreliable
Click to expand...
.
 
Using Kante in big games and against teams who don't park the bus (60% of the season maybe) makes sense. He played that amount of games for Chelsea last season.

If he is available for a cheap price then I would be excited by this, even if it was only a short term solution.
 
VinzentFTW said:
Kante: Inury prone, declining and old. Typical United
FDJ: Marquee, Expensive, doesnt want to come. Years since he was really good. Typical United.

Cant see a change tbh. Its just the same old bs. None of these players required good scouting either. Why cant we find better suited, up and coming and more motivated players ?
Click to expand...

Big difference.

LVG: Past it
Jose: Past it
Ole: flat out shite.

So I’m sure we will be alright.
 
He's one of my favorite players. BUT: That would be the 3rd signing of a major player aged 30 or more (plus Varane in his late 20s) in 3 summer windows. Should that be the transfer strategy for a club striving to build a contender for the coming seasons? What happened to building with young, hungry players? If it was a question of adding that one critical piece it might be different, but of course that's hardly where we are. What's the point of fixing the midfield with a player who will soon decline? And an oft-injured one at that.
 
How cut price are we talking? £15m?

Would be great if he could give us 1 good season beside someone like De Jong/Neves. The top DM's aren't available to us this year, and the ones that are, a little unconvincing.
 
Lynty said:
How cut price are we talking? £15m?

Would be great if he could give us 1 good season beside someone like De Jong/Neves. The top DM's aren't available to us this year, and the ones that are, a little unconvincing.
Click to expand...

I can't imagine he'd be cheap. Tuchel has stated publicly that he regards him as an essential player, so presumably the only reason they're selling him would be financial. Unless of course they know something about his health and durability that isn't common knowledge and are trying to build a market for him.
 
justsomebloke said:
I can't imagine he'd be cheap. Tuchel has stated publicly that he regards him as an essential player, so presumably the only reason they're selling him would be financial. Unless of course they know something about his health and durability that isn't common knowledge and are trying to build a market for him.
Click to expand...

Oh ok. No thanks then.

I saw a tweet about it being a cut price deal as he's on last year of contract.
 
justsomebloke said:
I can't imagine he'd be cheap. Tuchel has stated publicly that he regards him as an essential player, so presumably the only reason they're selling him would be financial. Unless of course they know something about his health and durability that isn't common knowledge and are trying to build a market for him.
Click to expand...
He played the 12th most minutes in the Chelsea squad. While he is essential player in ability, he isn't in availability. And Tuchel said so. There is no secret in Kante's durability, he is just getting to that stage in his career when he is very injury prone and can't play regularly. A bit like another excellent Chelsea midfielder we bought...
 
The boat sailed on buying Kante when he went to Chelsea.
He’s on the gradual decline now.
Can still be a brilliant player on his day, but he’s just one of a roster of midfield players who can do the job, in that Chelsea side.
He would be useful to us signing on a free, but otherwise we need to move on.
 
Giving that we'll be putting a lot of funds into other players, providing the scouts and coaches are happy with his fitness, I would have him for 15 to 20 million pounds personally. Deep lying playmaker would be De jong, with Garner as backup, box to box would be Kante with McFred as back up and attacking mid would be Bruno and DVB fighting it out.
Kante is not a DM, he's a box to box midfielder.
He'd be a stopgap solution for a couple of years while fix the rest of squad.
He'll bring much needed great character, quality and experience to the team.
 
Telsim said:
Some fecking rebuild that is where we sign a 31-year-old injury prone player. Chelsea wouldn't be selling him if they believed he's still got it at this level. Instead they are going to off load him to the Manchester United Retirement Home and use the funds to buy the next Kante.

The more things change the more they stay the same with this club.
Click to expand...

We need depth, he won’t cost loads because his contract is nearly up and he can be rotated and used wisely. Wouldnt surprise me if he’s a stop gap until we can go all in for Declan rice who will be too expensive this summer. Next season we could potentially have rotation of kante and rice which wouldn’t be bad at all. Massive upgrade


We’re not going to get every top target in one summer. We will need to get some cheaper short term deals done for next season, or free transfers as we’re going to lose around 10 players.
 
I'd take him for a reasonable fee (~20m) He'd be a huge upgrade on McTominay and it would give us a couple years to find a long term replacement
 
People on the other thread comparing De Jong to Di Maria. Which I don’t think is fair, given the other variables involved. But this one sounds eerily similar to Matic. Ageing Chelsea midfielder, who at his peak is class, but is now declining and can’t replicate that level if played for every game. I can see him going the same trajectory as Matic. Comes in all guns blazing, but slowly starts declining and has to be managed very carefully (which Ole didn’t do well with Matic).
 
Don't see us selling him for a fee others would accept paying even with only a year left. Physically he seems to be in decline, probably goes on a free transfer next summer.

Surely his engine will begin to suffer greatly in to his mid thirties and without that not enough there for a very top team.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.