Just a party animal that wanted the London lifestyle, clear as day.
True. I'd love to go out on the lash with N'Golo.
Just a party animal that wanted the London lifestyle, clear as day.
Nah like others said he wanted to go to you guys for whatever reason.You should've bought him then rather than spending similar money on Henry Mhkitiakdjdksjf. Chelsea paid his release clause, you could easily have done the same!
Nah like others said he wanted to go to you guys for whatever reason.
I was only wumming with the why Chelsea line btw, but it does pickle my brain a bit when foreign players have their own desired club that isn’t one of the traditionally ‘big’ teams.
I mean do many French kids Kante’s age support Chelsea?
Assuming your from London/UK it’s like you growing up supporting PSG or Dortmund. Just genuinely interests me.
Players born in the 90s would have grown up seeing Chelsea successful.Nah like others said he wanted to go to you guys for whatever reason.
I was only wumming with the why Chelsea line btw, but it does pickle my brain a bit when foreign players have their own desired club that isn’t one of the traditionally ‘big’ teams.
I mean do many French kids Kante’s age support Chelsea?
Assuming your from London/UK it’s like you growing up supporting PSG or Dortmund. Just genuinely interests me.
Yeah perhaps I'm underplaying the lure of various factors such as past players and the location.I don't think he joined us because he was a Chelsea fan (although when he was young, we'd have had the likes of Desailly, Makalele & Anelka so I'm sure he would've had some level of interest) but he does get the train over to Paris a fair bit. London itself is a draw.
You just know his alcohol stamina would be off the charts, still downing tequila shots at 6am with a smile on his faceTrue. I'd love to go out on the lash with N'Golo.
Fred would have looked great against that RM midfield tonight. They were so pedestrian. Tailor made for the little guy to run right throughPoor man's Fred according to some on here.
He was our worst player when we were on top and our best player when Real Madrid were on the front foot.
Werner was shit.He was our worst player when we were on top and our best player when Real Madrid were on the front foot.
Poor man's Fred according to some on here.
it’s genuinely such a terrible opinion, I don’t know why so many continue to repeat it
Those some have no clue, Kante is a different class.Poor man's Fred according to some on here.
Werner was shit.
Nah he was fecking shit. Getting sick of him missing sitters.Made some decent runs in the first 20 minutes but yes he was poor. For me though Azpi was our worst player on the night; looked off the pace. Understandable as I don't think he has the legs to play as a RWB at this point, especially for the second time in 4 days. That said, I think Tuchel was worried about Vini isolating 1v1 against Azpilicueta and as such moved him out of that RCB slot. Thought Christensen was imperious on the night generally.
Nah he was fecking shit. Getting sick of him missing sitters.
Azpi held it OK but shouldn't have played rwb again but as you say (bar the shit defending on the goal) the 3 cbs in open play were good.
One of giroud or tammy need to play imo in the second leg. We need a player to stay in the box.Agreed Werner was poor. Still for me Azpi was worse; Werner was creating a lot of the space Pulisic was able to find between the lines, for instance. Won't deny we looked better with him off and Havertz moving all over the place though.
One of giroud or tammy need to play imo in the second leg. We need a player to stay in the box.
We need a striker that's gonna finish in the Box.Disagree. Madrid have to attack and will have to leave spaces behind. Giroud is someone I'd only use when we have 70%+ possession - don't think he offers anything in open play at this point given how immobile he is.
I'd probably start with Havertz - Mount - Pulisic personally - think that's probably our best front 3 at the moment both on and off the ball.
I'd go for Mount, Havertz & Ziyech. I feel Ziyech is far better at pressing and nicking a ball in the final third. But I imagine Ziyech will play against Fulham because Pulisic looked knackered and then Pulisic gets in for the second leg.Disagree. Madrid have to attack and will have to leave spaces behind. Giroud is someone I'd only use when we have 70%+ possession - don't think he offers anything in open play at this point given how immobile he is.
I'd probably start with Havertz - Mount - Pulisic personally - think that's probably our best front 3 at the moment both on and off the ball.
I wouldn't play both havertz and ziyech from the start. We saw that at Brighton we lose too much paceI'd go for Mount, Havertz & Ziyech. I feel Ziyech is far better at pressing and nicking a ball in the final third. But I imagine Ziyech will play against Fulham because Pulisic looked knackered and then Pulisic gets in for the second leg.
We need a striker that's gonna finish in the Box.
I'd go for Mount, Havertz & Ziyech. I feel Ziyech is far better at pressing and nicking a ball in the final third. But I imagine Ziyech will play against Fulham because Pulisic looked knackered and then Pulisic gets in for the second leg.