But Jerrah likens him to a young Tom Landry, and he's a yes man. Garrett is safe for another few years.
He looks a little bit like Moyes doesn't he?
But Jerrah likens him to a young Tom Landry, and he's a yes man. Garrett is safe for another few years.
belichick did it in the super bowl. it can work that way with smart coaching.
I was thinking, what are the determining factors for rookies to succeed in the NFL?
Compared to the NBA for example where players often are a bit younger when they enter the league, there have been a number of prolific rookies on both sides of the ball in the NFL in the last couple of years - especially at skills positions, since a lot of rookie QBs struggle in their first year. What's the reason for that? I think college football employs different systems than the NFL teams do but shouldn't that also have an impact for CBs, RBs and WRs for example?
CB: Ward/James this year, Lattimore last year, Ramsey two years ago
RB: Barkley, Hunt/Fournette last year, Zeke two years ago
All rookies which were immediately top 10 players in their position imo, something I haven't seen an NBA rookie do in a long time for example. Yet, as for QBs, very little have an immediate impact or play on an elite level. I get that they face more pressure and a new playbook and stuff, but their receivers should also be better at running routes and creating seperation, I guess? Of course the pool is a lot bigger in the NFL draft than NBA draft, but still, I thought it was a bit remarkable, and also a genuine question as to why rookie QBs struggle so much compared to rookie RBs who seem to get on immediately.
I was thinking, what are the determining factors for rookies to succeed in the NFL?
Compared to the NBA for example where players often are a bit younger when they enter the league, there have been a number of prolific rookies on both sides of the ball in the NFL in the last couple of years - especially at skills positions, since a lot of rookie QBs struggle in their first year. What's the reason for that? I think college football employs different systems than the NFL teams do but shouldn't that also have an impact for CBs, RBs and WRs for example?
CB: Ward/James this year, Lattimore last year, Ramsey two years ago
RB: Barkley, Hunt/Fournette last year, Zeke two years ago
All rookies which were immediately top 10 players in their position imo, something I haven't seen an NBA rookie do in a long time for example. Yet, as for QBs, very little have an immediate impact or play on an elite level. I get that they face more pressure and a new playbook and stuff, but their receivers should also be better at running routes and creating seperation, I guess? Of course the pool is a lot bigger in the NFL draft than NBA draft, but still, I thought it was a bit remarkable, and also a genuine question as to why rookie QBs struggle so much compared to rookie RBs who seem to get on immediately.
I think that could be a valid point (although I think Dallas just isn't playing to Dak's strength anymore), but Barkley is having a great start to his career behind one of the worst offensive lines in the NFL at the moment...?Doesn't it heavily depend on the O line the franchise in question has? Bills and Cardinals have shockingly bad O lines and their Rookie QBs look even worse because of it. When Dallas drafted Zeke and Dak a few years ago, both were taking the league by storm because their O line was outstanding. Now that the O line is weaker, Dak looks much more average compared to his first year.
Rosen looked good.
Cardinals have fired Mike McCoy, personally I'd have fired him after the first offensive series yesterday.
All falling into place for a Bears WGronk officially out.
That didn't look good for Sony Michel
Yeah that looks a season ender.
I hate the Patriots but hopefully not, never nice to see someone injured like that.
Yeah. Poor bastard suffered knee trouble in college as well.
You splitting time between here and F1 thread as well tonight? I got laptop and tv next to each other