I think I explained my reasoning previously.
Athletes invoke god covertly/overtly citing god's plan or god is good as conveying that god helped said club/team win and/or player make key plays. I find it ludicrous to do such as god* clearly has no rooting interest in sport, seemingly more important things to worry about. It's akin to imbeciles citing god as the key factor in medical "miracles" while ignoring science and not giving credit to physicians. The same crowd will claim it's god's plan if the person dies. It's a logic failure.
*Assuming god exists, which I highly doubt.
As much as I'd like to debate you on it, we are in the NFL thread lol. I'm sure the topic has been done to death on the forum anyway. FWIW I'm a Christian and I don't think God is into picking favourites in sport either.
What I think was worse than all that was the offence we we got possession with 4 minutes left. Rather than making some 1st downs to run the clock, they opted to just make 4 loss of yards plays. Rodgers should have held to the ball for a couple of first downs.
Agreed, it was too negative and Seahawks were set for the run cos they knew we were going to try run the clock. It was silly management and play calling that cost us in the end (as well as bad decisions by players not doing their jobs)
I find the after game guessing on play-calling to be typical armchair quarterbacking from fans. Up 12 with around four/five minutes remaining, the other side hasn't done squat offensively, it makes sense to play conservatively. Instead of blaming the play-calling, blame the player that fecked up the onside kick and/or the defense for not stopping an offense that had looked miserable for 56 minutes.
Well you say after game guessing, but if you were on twitter you would see that I was discussing this with other packer fans who expected this as soon as we got the interception that we would run every single play. And thats what we did.
Yes we fecked up the onside kick and the 2 point conversion, but negativity in our plays throughout the game cost us in the end. 5 turnovers only resulted in 6 points. Says it all
True, but more so because it was during the game rather than in hindsight. Mccarthy can get too conservative and in the 4th quarter we played not to lose rather than keep up the intensity and it cost us. Our biggest form of attack is letting Rodgers get the ball in his hand and pick up yards.Fair points although Twitter is certainly not a solid reference point.
Listening on the radio... Is Indy double-teaming Gronkowski?
No. They're just holding him without being called for it.
I find the after game guessing on play-calling to be typical armchair quarterbacking from fans. Up 12 with around four/five minutes remaining, the other side hasn't done squat offensively, it makes sense to play conservatively. Instead of blaming the play-calling, blame the player that fecked up the onside kick and/or the defense for not stopping an offense that had looked miserable for 56 minutes.
One of the least competitive conference championship games I've ever seen
He does have a case of the Favre's about him doesn't he