Di Maria's angel
Captain of Moanchester United
For 190 million we could probably sign Pogba and Zlatan and have plenty left over. It's obscene money.
It's £137 million, still a lot of money. But he's probably worth it.
For 190 million we could probably sign Pogba and Zlatan and have plenty left over. It's obscene money.
If the CAF ran a poll of unobtainable (cream yourself) signings for this window who would win?
Bale (tick)
Müller
Neymar
A.N.Other
I've got it all worked out, folks. Woodward going to Barcelona to sign Pedro, only for him to end up at Chelsea, was just as smokescreen for the Neymar chatter we're hearing now. The Neymar chatter is itself a smokescreen for Woodward making a huge bid for Messi. But wait, there's more! The Messi bid is just a decoy to lull Madrid into a false sense of security regarding the strength of their main La Liga opposition, thus ending their pursuit of De Gea, and allowing us to slip in and steal Ronaldo from under their nose.
I'm not putting any faith in these rumours, but I fail to see how people think this is a ruse to distract attention from failing to get Pedro.
In the first place, it sounds like we could have easily gotten Pedro had we really wanted to.
Secondly, if this is a ruse, how would anyone think we would come out of it in a positive light? Trying to divert attention away from failing to sign someone by failing to sign someone even more high-profile is non-sensical.
Yes, we all love the famous and handy 'save face by courting further inevitable humiliation on a more massive scale' technique. It's worked very well judging by the reaction on here.
For 190 million we could probably sign Pogba and Zlatan and have plenty left over. It's obscene money.
You, Neymar's mum and a couple of Barca fans are the only people in the world who might think that.
@cyberman
Ronaldo was definitely better than Neymar when Ronaldo was Neymar's age (23 years old). As good as Neymar was last season, Ronaldo was better in 2007-2008 season.
How do you work that out? Since 2001, the world transfer record increased from €75M to something around €100M. €1bn, even in euros, is unlikely to happen in the next 20 years.As an aside, I've just worked out that, at current progression, we are due to see the worlds first £1bn transfer some time in the mid 2030s.
What a time to be alive that will be.
Don't bother with the transfer bollocks. But where are these stories coming from? Did LVG say he was interested? Or is it just one dodgy article that's sparked it?
Neymar scored 39 goals last season, Ronaldo scored 61. You really cannot just casually dismiss the goalscoring argument.Well they are obviously the few well-opined then.
Ronaldo hasn't been the prettiest footballer to watch for a few years. People will say it doesn't matter, simply because he scores 50 goals a season, which in itself is fair. However, the moment one of those other more pretty players start putting up numbers like his, he loses that edge over them in my opinion. Neymar got 43 goals last season. That is enough to take out the goalscoring argument. Especially as Ronaldo plays for a team who get a load of dodgy pens which form a portion of his goals, with tap-ins making a large part of the others.
Neymar has the grace, flair AND the end product. He's stepped up in pressure situations, carrying the monster of Brasil on his back, scoring goals in both legs of the CL semis and the CL final itself, and finishing top scorer in the tournament. Anyone not going based off names alone would agree that Neymar has been a better footballer than Ronaldo since the last World Cup at least in my opinion.
I'm not sure we can say that.
Since the first £10m transfer in 1992 (which seems a pretty good place to cut-off the "modern era") the world transfer record has been broken 12 times, the list including names such as Ronaldo MkI, Figo, Zidane, Kaka, C Ronaldo.
On average it has gone up by 20%, and never by 50% or more.
In fact, in its entire history, the record has been broken 42 times, and the last time it went up by 90% was in 1932, when Bernabé Ferreyra was sold for £23,000.
So I don't think we can ever say that an increase of 90% is easily justified. He could prove to be worth the money, sure, but let's not lose perpective on what an incredibly massive fee that would be.
Neymar scored 39 goals last season, Ronaldo scored 61. You really cannot just casually dismiss the goalscoring argument.
Neymar's a very good player who had a brilliant season for Barca but he's not better than Ronaldo. He might become better very soon, not least because Ronaldo turns 31 next year and his game relies heavily on athleticism.
He will be signed on page 80
There is nothing in this..dont get sucked in...We have as good a chance of signing Ramos tomorrow..Don't bother with the transfer bollocks. But where are these stories coming from? Did LVG say he was interested? Or is it just one dodgy article that's sparked it?
All right then, let's look at it like that. Ronaldo scored 48 goals in the league in 3099 minutes. 10 of those were penalties so we discount those: 38 goals in 3099 minutes comes out to a goal every 81.55 minutes.Their scoring record per 90 minutes was about equal, penalties excluded. Ronaldo played considerably more minutes and took something like 15 penalties. That's the only difference.
Neymar scored 39 goals last season, Ronaldo scored 61. You really cannot just casually dismiss the goalscoring argument.
Neymar's a very good player who had a brilliant season for Barca but he's not better than Ronaldo. He might become better very soon, not least because Ronaldo turns 31 next year and his game relies heavily on athleticism.
All right then, let's look at it like that. Ronaldo scored 48 goals in the league in 3099 minutes. 10 of those were penalties so we discount those: 38 goals in 3099 minutes comes out to a goal every 81.55 minutes.
Neymar scored 22 goals in the league in 2572 minutes, one of those was a penalty so we discount that. 21 goals in 2572 minutes comes out to a goal every 122.47 minutes. So, even discounting penalties Ronaldo's scoring record is massively superior in the league.
In the CL their record is pretty much identical: 1065 minutes vs 1027 minutes, both scored 10 goals. Can't be arsed about the Copa del Rey as Ronaldo barely played in that one (117 minutes).
Don't bother with the transfer bollocks. But where are these stories coming from? Did LVG say he was interested? Or is it just one dodgy article that's sparked it?
That's a fair point but the post I replied to there specifically stated that their scoring record is about equal if we look at it on a per minutes basis and it's simply not true.The point is, due to Ronaldo not looking that good in other areas of his game - Neymar does not need to match his total to be considered better.
All right then, let's look at it like that. Ronaldo scored 48 goals in the league in 3099 minutes. 10 of those were penalties so we discount those: 38 goals in 3099 minutes comes out to a goal every 81.55 minutes.
Neymar scored 22 goals in the league in 2572 minutes, one of those was a penalty so we discount that. 21 goals in 2572 minutes comes out to a goal every 122.47 minutes. So, even discounting penalties Ronaldo's scoring record is massively superior in the league.
In the CL their record is pretty much identical: 1065 minutes vs 1027 minutes, both scored 10 goals. Can't be arsed about the Copa del Rey as Ronaldo barely played in that one (117 minutes).
How do you work that out? Since 2001, the world transfer record increased from €75M to something around €100M. €1bn, even in euros, is unlikely to happen in the next 20 years.
Players are not signed based on ability alone, as they may have been in 30s. Neymar's fee would be largely down to what he can contribute off the field, for instance, which wouldn't have been a factor at a certain point.
Nah, surely he can't be that silly.I am pretty certain it is being fed to them by Woody
There have been too many of these silly stories for the past few windows with Woody at the helm for it to be a coincidence
How do you work that out? Since 2001, the world transfer record increased from €75M to something around €100M. €1bn, even in euros, is unlikely to happen in the next 20 years.
Nah, surely he can't be that silly.
I think it's just a symptom of click-bait journalism and United are the biggest story out there.
If you now further want to put in a weight according to the importance of the goals (a brace against PSG in the CL quarters or a brace against Bayern in the CL semis or a brace against Atletico in the domestic Cup is obviously worth more than scoring 5 goals in a game in a 9 game rout against Granada or consecutive hattricks in glorified friendlies after Barca already officially won the league), you should come to the conclusion that Ronaldo, in fact, didn't outperform Neymar as much as surface stats like "61 goals vs. 39 goals" would suggest. IMO.
Only laughing stock are the clowns who believe we expect to sign him this summer. Saying that there's nothing wrong with enquiring about his future plans.Just taken a look round some non United fora. You guys realise we've become a laughing stock? Can't land Mane so we're trying to sign Neymar etc.