Next Man Utd Manager Expected To Be Jose Mourinho Or David Moyes

Interesting, don't watch a huge amount of Everton (Aside from when they're on live TV and highlights on MOTD), but of course we all know they're not a thrilling side. Which makes the likes of Baldwin and others a wee bit hypocritical considering one of their main reasons for not wanting Mourinho to take over is the fact they think his sides play boring football.

In fairness, Moyes can only work with and get the best out of what he's got. He can't go out and splash big money on world-class talent like Jose has been able to do at nearly every club he's been at.

Judging Moyes on tactics and brand of football is unfair until he has more options at his disposal and better quality player's to work with.

If Mourinho had a bench containing the likes of Baxter, Hibbert, and Anichebe, I doubt he'd be in a rush to get them on either.
 
In fairness, Moyes can only work with and get the best out of what he's got. He can't go out and splash big money on world-class talent like Jose has been able to do at nearly every club he's been at.

Judging Moyes on tactics and brand of football is unfair until he has more options at his disposal and better quality player's to work with.

If Mourinho had a bench containing the likes of Baxter, Hibbert, and Anichebe, I doubt he'd be in a rush to get them on either.

Holloway doesn't have a big budget and his team are playing some cracking stuff this season. Is the amount you spend linked to how attractively your teams can play football? Arsenal barely spend anything but they're an excellent side to watch when on form.
 
Holloway doesn't have a big budget and his team are playing some cracking stuff this season. Is the amount you spend linked to how attractively your teams can play football? Arsenal barely spend anything but they're an excellent side to watch when on form.

Of course there is correlation, that's why city play such scintillating stuff.
 
I think Everton play decent stuff. Nothing spectacular but decent.

But still I can't understand why anyone would want Moyes over Mourinho. I just don't get it.
 
Erm...


Porto (2002–2004)

2003 Portuguese Liga
2003 Portuguese Cup
2003 UEFA Cup
2003 Portuguese Super Cup
2004 Portugese Liga
2004 UEFA Champions League

Chelsea (2004–2007)

2005 FA Premier League
2005 League Cup
2005 FA Community Shield
2006 FA Premier League
2007 League Cup
2007 FA Cup

Internazionale (2008–2010)

2008 Supercoppa Italiana
2009 Serie A
2010 Serie A
2010 Coppa Italia
2010 UEFA Champions League

Yes, I think he's good enough.



Pretty shite? They lost the title by 2 points (Would have lost it on GD had Bolton not scored in the last minute) and came within an inch (literally) of being crowned European Champions.

At Inter he's left Benitez with the reigning Italian and European Champions, I'm sure Benitez didn't walk in and find himself disappointed at what he'd been left with.

I can undestand certain reservations about Mourinho, but stuff like this is just a load of bollocks, really.

But my point is he's always come into a team at the peak of their prowess. When he left Porto their team fell apart, when he left Chelsea the team was in a worse state then when he started and same can now be said of Inter.

Does it mean that Jose's much better than other managers, or has he never had to rebuild a team? Has he ever shown that he has the long term future of a club in mind?
 
Holloway doesn't have a big budget and his team are playing some cracking stuff this season. Is the amount you spend linked to how attractively your teams can play football? Arsenal barely spend anything but they're an excellent side to watch when on form.

It depends on the type of player's at your disposal and what approach suits their strengths. Everton don't play shite football anyway, ok it's not a patch on Arsenal, Spurs, United and the likes, but it's not drab or long-ball like City or Stoke.
 
Did he come into Porto at their peak? They hadn't won the league in 3 years and were nobodies in Europe. 2 years later they've won successive league titles, a UEFA Cup and a Champions League. And they've hardly fell apart, in the 6 seasons since Mourinho has left Porto have won the title 4 times. Pretty good going.

Chelsea weren't at their peak either, Mourinho came in and helped that team break virtually every record, in his first season. For a foreign manager to come in and do as good a job as he did in 04/05 takes something special. The team that won the title last year is also pretty much still his, the only one really being Anelka who Grant signed.

At Inter it's far too early to tell, but I think their poor showing so far this season is more down to the manager at the helm rather than the team he's been left with. Inter's first XI is formidable.
 
How is Moyes meant to prove himself capable of winning trophies until a trophy-winning club gives him a chance(no disrespect to Everton)?

It's an unfair criticism IMO, it's like Porto not taking a chance on Mourinho when they did due to him not winning trophies. Trophies aren't the only currency in which success can be measured, Moyes work at Everton is probably the equivalent of 2-3 trophies at a top 4 club.

I really agree with this and am always baffled by the ability United fans have on here to completely overlook that.

If managers were all judged purely on trophies it would mean there's only ever been about 4 decent managers working in the Premier League. The truth is that the league and cup competitions have been dominated so long by so few that it's unfair to hold a lack of silverware against guys like Moyes and Redknapp.
 
I think Everton play decent stuff. Nothing spectacular but decent.

But still I can't understand why anyone would want Moyes over Mourinho. I just don't get it.

1. More likely to stay and provide long term stability ala Fergie
2. Mourinho would mean more sensational and ABU media attention than ever.
3. Moyes has proved he can handle big egos and provide motivation
4. He seems to understand and optimise the transfer market.
5. He believes in investing in a sound youth policy
6. He is Scottish and Fergie wants him to be his successor

Just my opinion of course.
 
But my point is he's always come into a team at the peak of their prowess. When he left Porto their team fell apart, when he left Chelsea the team was in a worse state then when he started and same can now be said of Inter.

What in the bloody bollocks are you talking about? Porto have a few titles AFTER Mourinho left.

Chelsea, yes they struggled for three years but that does not mean it was Mourinho's fault. It was the managers who came in after him who did not do the job.

Inter is in a bad state? They won everything last year for feck sake. According to what stats have you based your opinions on? Benitez is not even half the manager Mourinho is. If he can't win with the team he's got at Inter, then I don't know with what team he can win titles.

Your love for Blanc is undermining Mourinho's brilliance. If the cafe keeps talking about Mourinho, then deal with it rather than giving lame excuses about him.
 
But my point is he's always come into a team at the peak of their prowess. When he left Porto their team fell apart, when he left Chelsea the team was in a worse state then when he started and same can now be said of Inter.

Does it mean that Jose's much better than other managers, or has he never had to rebuild a team? Has he ever shown that he has the long term future of a club in mind?

That's the most ridiculous post in any Mourinho related threads.

Porto won 4 titles in the 5 years post-Mourinho.

Chelsea finished 2pts behind us (should really have been GD) and were one slip away from the CL in the season post-Mourinho.

Inter, well, Benitez is ruining what Jose created rather quickly.
 
But my point is he's always come into a team at the peak of their prowess. When he left Porto their team fell apart, when he left Chelsea the team was in a worse state then when he started and same can now be said of Inter.

Does it mean that Jose's much better than other managers, or has he never had to rebuild a team? Has he ever shown that he has the long term future of a club in mind?

It means he's much better than other managers.
 
In fairness, Moyes can only work with and get the best out of what he's got. He can't go out and splash big money on world-class talent like Jose has been able to do at nearly every club he's been at.

He splashed a lot on Benny McCarthy didn't he.

Judging Moyes on tactics and brand of football is unfair until he has more options at his disposal and better quality player's to work with.

This could be said of any manager really. It doesn't really prove anything about how Moyes is better than Mourinho, which of course he isn't.

If Mourinho had a bench containing the likes of Baxter, Hibbert, and Anichebe, I doubt he'd be in a rush to get them on either.

Chances are Mourinho might have gotten better players than that, or at the least gotten more out of them.
 
1. More likely to stay and provide long term stability ala Fergie
2. Mourinho would mean more sensational and ABU media attention than ever.
3. Moyes has proved he can handle big egos and provide motivation
4. He seems to understand and optimise the transfer market.
5. He believes in investing in a sound youth policy
6. He is Scottish and Fergie wants him to be his successor

Just my opinion of course.

6 is ridiculous

Mourinho is better at 3 and 4 and I don't know how you could know 5 unless you have some sort of mind-reading powers?

1 is true, although Mourinho has always said he loves the English game the most, so surely this must increase his chances of wanting to stay for a longer period of time

And is 2 necessarily a big problem? Media focus on Mourinho would possibly take it away from other players in the team and allow them to focus more on their game
 
But my point is he's always come into a team at the peak of their prowess. When he left Porto their team fell apart, when he left Chelsea the team was in a worse state then when he started and same can now be said of Inter.

Does it mean that Jose's much better than other managers, or has he never had to rebuild a team? Has he ever shown that he has the long term future of a club in mind?

As it has been said, he made Porto, Domestic and European Champions. Porto were quite good domestically having been runners up two seasons prior to his arrival when they ended up 3rd, but it has to be said that he made them a force in Europe again.

He does take on quite good teams and adds on that little bit needed to make them champions, domestically and european. Never in a million years would Inter have won a Champions League if they weren't under him. They were shit in Europe, and shit in the league really, but they always got decisions their way because of the calcioppoli in the Serie A. That is why there was a big difference between Inter in the League, and in the Champions League.

He didn't leave Porto in a bad state. They continued to be champions for few more years. Being crowned European Champions however, put their players in the spotlight.

Ferreira, Carvalho, Nuno Valente, Costinha, Pedro Mendes, Maniche, Deco, Derlei, and Alenichev, all left the same year, or the year after Mourinho left. The ones in bold immediately.

Chelsea were never going to become Champions without Mourinhos tactics and key players. I reckon they would have beat us in the final under Mourinho too.
 
He splashed a lot on Benny McCarthy didn't he.



This could be said of any manager really. It doesn't really prove anything about how Moyes is better than Mourinho, which of course he isn't.



Chances are Mourinho might have gotten better players than that, or at the least gotten more out of them.

Who? Moyes? I can't recall Benni McCarthy playing for Preston or Everton at any point, so no.

Judging by Mourinho's track record with youth, I doubt Baxter or Anichebe would be any better off under Jose than they are under Moyes, getting minutes under their belt. Besides, I can't really see how Jose would get any more out of that Everton squad than Moyes has managed to over the last X amount of years.

Let's be clear...Mourinho is the better manager and would be my pick to take over, however, to dismiss Moyes completely is unfair and shows a bit of tunnel vision from some people in regards to our next manager. If Moyes is given the job(a good possibility IMO) I don't think we can have any complaints, I'd understand why the club would choose to go down that road instead of the one leading to the Mourinho circus.
 
Who? Moyes? I can't recall Benni McCarthy playing for Preston or Everton at any point, so no.

Judging by Mourinho's track record with youth, I doubt Baxter or Anichebe would be any better off under Jose than they are under Moyes, getting minutes under their belt. Besides, I can't really see how Jose would get any more out of that Everton squad than Moyes has managed to over the last X amount of years.

Let's be clear...Mourinho is the better manager and would be my pick to take over, however, to dismiss Moyes completely is unfair and shows a bit of tunnel vision from some people in regards to our next manager. If Moyes is given the job(a good possibility IMO) I don't think we can have any complaints, I'd understand why the club would choose to go down that road instead of the one leading to the Mourinho circus.

McCarthy was a member of Porto 04 wasn't he.

TBH, I think its Mourinho's job if he wants it. There's no British Isles based manager who is even remotely qualified for the United job.
 
the problem with moyes as far as i´m concerned isn´t with his team tactics or his motivational skills or his man-management,it would be his ability to attract big names to our club which is something the next manchester united manager will also need on top of all the other attributes.

mourinho has all the above requirements because he has already won lots of things so has a proven track record which in turn makes players want to play for him, moyes does not have this.

laurent blanc whilst still only a fledgling manager has also started to win things but he also had a terrific playing career,so lots of players again will want to play for him, moyes on the other hand had this playing career.....

1980–1983 Celtic 24 (0)
1983–1985 Cambridge United 79 (1)
1985–1987 Bristol City 83 (6)
1987–1990 Shrewsbury Town 96 (11)
1990–1993 Dunfermline Athletic 105 (13)
1993 Hamilton Academical 5 (0)
1993–1999 Preston North End 143 (15)
Total 535 (46)
 
I must admit Mourinho is impressing me at Real and has not been as negative as I thought he would.
 
McCarthy was a member of Porto 04 wasn't he.

TBH, I think its Mourinho's job if he wants it. There's no British Isles based manager who is even remotely qualified for the United job.

Oh right, sorry mate, I thought you were talking about Moyes buying McCarthy. I don't know what relevance that has to this discussion though.

Moyes is qualified for it IMO, his work at Everton demands respect and cosideration for a top job soon. Only him and Jose are in contention for it right now IMO but I can't see United(Charlton and Gill in particular) going for Mourinho.
 
Who? Moyes? I can't recall Benni McCarthy playing for Preston or Everton at any point, so no.

Judging by Mourinho's track record with youth, I doubt Baxter or Anichebe would be any better off under Jose than they are under Moyes, getting minutes under their belt. Besides, I can't really see how Jose would get any more out of that Everton squad than Moyes has managed to over the last X amount of years.

Let's be clear...Mourinho is the better manager and would be my pick to take over, however, to dismiss Moyes completely is unfair and shows a bit of tunnel vision from some people in regards to our next manager. If Moyes is given the job(a good possibility IMO) I don't think we can have any complaints, I'd understand why the club would choose to go down that road instead of the one leading to the Mourinho circus.

That's completely baseless prediction there. I personally think Jose would have done much better, at least Everton would not every season badly like they do under Moyes.

The only reason Moyes is being mentioned as a possible replacement for Sir Alex appears to be his nationality. There is no way anyone should be considered if Mourinho is available.
 
That's completely baseless prediction there. I personally think Jose would have done much better, at least Everton would not every season badly like they do under Moyes.

The only reason Moyes is being mentioned as a possible replacement for Sir Alex appears to be his nationality. There is no way anyone should be considered if Mourinho is available.

So says you, the ultimate Mourinho fanboi. I'll bet Bobby Charlton, David Gill, and our money men will beg to differ.

Jose isn't going to come cheap, he already earns more than SAF and every other manager in the world and would not move club unless that remained the case and he had a large transfer warchest to play with, something I also doubt we could provide.

Also, Moyes passport isn't why he's highly thought of at OT and amongst those not obsessed with Mourinho, it's because he's done a damn fine job on a budget similar to that of Bolton, Blackburn, Fulham etc, all clubs that have been nowhere near the levels Everton have reached.
 
So says you, the ultimate Mourinho fanboi. I'll bet Bobby Charlton, David Gill, and our money men will beg to differ.

Jose isn't going to come cheap, he already earns more than SAF and every other manager in the world and would not move club unless that remained the case and he had a large transfer warchest to play with, something I also doubt we could provide.

Also, Moyes passport isn't why he's highly thought of at OT and amongst those not obsessed with Mourinho, it's because he's done a damn fine job on a budget similar to that of Bolton, Blackburn, Fulham etc, all clubs that have been nowhere near the levels Everton have reached.

I don't know about you, but even Arsenal's record for the past few years isn't good enough for United, and Wenger isn't spending much more than the midtable sides.

As for Jose's wage, I did say "If he's available"...
 
One thing to bear in mind about any new United manager is the fact that there has never been a Manager at this club outside of the British Isles. A lot of you might dismiss this, but I feel it would be important to bear this in mind when guessing who is going to be the next one. No matter what you think, being English/Scottish/Welsh/Irish would give you an advantage over the European manager.

They will clearly have a greater will to bring on young local players and give british players a better oportunity. I think that this should be beared in mind, as these are great traditions of the club which should not be forgotten about for short term gain. However I don't know how much our wonderful owners would worry about this.

(and im not a little englander, Im Irish b4 some of you accuse me of it)
 
Ferguson will go on for another 3 years at least if you ask me.
 
One thing to bear in mind about any new United manager is the fact that there has never been a Manager at this club outside of the British Isles. A lot of you might dismiss this, but I feel it would be important to bear this in mind when guessing who is going to be the next one. No matter what you think, being English/Scottish/Welsh/Irish would give you an advantage over the European manager.

They will clearly have a greater will to bring on young local players and give british players a better oportunity. I think that this should be beared in mind, as these are great traditions of the club which should not be forgotten about for short term gain. However I don't know how much our wonderful owners would worry about this.

(and im not a little englander, Im Irish b4 some of you accuse me of it)

I think you may have a point. We won't really know our club's strategy for appointing a new manager until it's required, we don't know if the emphasis may have shifted in the 24 years since we last had to.

We certainly have traditions and history to consider, that's why I think people like Bobby and Gill will veto him coming here.

One thing is for sure though, if this place was around in 86, people like Cal, kietotheworld, Elvis and co would have probably slit themselves in the wrist when we plumped for SAF ahead of the more desired manager's at the time like Venables and co, "He's not proven himself in England yet" or some other tosh would have been used against him as are unrealistic demands being used against Moyes and anyone who's not Mourinho now.
 
We certainly have traditions and history to consider, that's why I think people like Bobby and Gill will veto him coming here.

I honestly think this counts for nothing in today's game.

Especially with American owners.
 
I honestly think this counts for nothing in today's game.

Especially with American owners.

Maybe so, but the fact the Glazer's leave the running of the football side to Gill, SAF, and Bobby Charlton would suggest they'll go with whoever is recommended by those three. The Glazer's aren't clued up enough about football or the traditions of MUFC(sad state of affairs, I know) to just go out and pluck the manager their uninformed opinion favours.

Whatever manager those three astute people come up with, will have my backing. I'm not sure I could say that for lots of folk if that man isn't the much-adored Mourinho.
 
I can't understand the concept of even comparing Moyes and Mourinho.

Look at his Fa Cup record:

2002-2003: QF
2003-2004: 4th rnd
2004-2005: 5th rnd
2005-2006: 4th rnd
2006-2007: 3rd rnd
2007-2008: 3rd rnd
2008-2009: Final
2009-2010: 4th rnd

Thats a pretty awful record frankly for a pretty decent side. He doesn't have the experience or the winning mentality to make it at United. He's too much of a risk.
 
Maybe so, but the fact the Glazer's leave the running of the football side to Gill, SAF, and Bobby Charlton would suggest they'll go with whoever is recommended by those three. The Glazer's aren't clued up enough about football or the traditions of MUFC(sad state of affairs, I know) to just go out and pluck the manager their uninformed opinion favours.

Whatever manager those three astute people come up with, will have my backing. I'm not sure I could say that for lots of folk if that man isn't the much-adored Mourinho.

You give me the impression that you believe Gill does care for tradition and that anybody at Glazer level cares at all for what Bobby Charlton might have to say on any given matter.

I certainly don't think Gill will pass up on someone foreign if that person has the credentials just because he doesn't hail from the Isles. Far from it in fact.
 
I can't understand the concept of even comparing Moyes and Mourinho.

Look at his Fa Cup record:

2002-2003: QF
2003-2004: 4th rnd
2004-2005: 5th rnd
2005-2006: 4th rnd
2006-2007: 3rd rnd
2007-2008: 3rd rnd
2008-2009: Final
2009-2010: 4th rnd

Thats a pretty awful record frankly for a pretty decent side. He doesn't have the experience or the winning mentality to make it at United. He's too much of a risk.

This is an unfair thing to throw at him IMO. Only Pompey and Spurs have managed to break the monopoly on the FA and League Cup trophies by the traditional "big 4", and both also needed a huge slice of luck in their favour to do so.
 
This is an unfair thing to throw at him IMO. Only Pompey and Spurs have managed to break the monopoly on the FA and League Cup trophies by the traditional "big 4", and both also needed a huge slice of luck in their favour to do so.

I'm not expecting Everton to be in the final each year. But to have been knocked out that many times in the 3rd/4th round is pretty bloody rubbish for a premiership side.

How else are we meant to judge Moyes achievements if we can't look at the clubs record in the FA Cup/Premiership/Carling Cup etc.
 
You give me the impression that you believe Gill does care for tradition and that anybody at Glazer level cares at all for what Bobby Charlton might have to say on any given matter.

I certainly don't think Gill will pass up on someone foreign if that person has the credentials just because he doesn't hail from the Isles. Far from it in fact.

Of course Gill cares about the tradition and fabric of the club, he might be a contradictory sod and all that but ultimately I think his intentions are good and his judgement sound.

I'm not saying he'll pass up on Jose because of his nationality, I reckon he might pass up on him because of his inflated salary, the circus that surrounds him, the fact Jose will want and has never worked without a high maintenence budget, and has a reputation for scramming at the first sign of trouble or when a bigger wage is wafted under his nostrils.

As for Bobby, he's already made it perfectly clear he "doesn't see him here" and has little faith in his ability to bring on the youth and live up to the type of football ingrained in our identity. That's Bobby's view and I don't think you can argue with it, to be honest.
 
I don't want Moyes because he's not proven himself

I don't want Mourinho as he winds me up, to egotistical and wouldn't respect the clubs values.

So I want Blanc. In the middle.
 
I'm not expecting Everton to be in the final each year. But to have been knocked out that many times in the 3rd/4th round is pretty bloody rubbish for a premiership side.

How else are we meant to judge Moyes achievements if we can't look at the clubs record in the FA Cup/Premiership/Carling Cup etc.

How about the fact he qualified a club similar in financial power to relagation battlers over the years like Bolton, Fulham, Blackburn and co, for CL football, UEFA Cup football, reached a cup final, consistently overachieves on a shoestring budget, and has shown savvy in the market to get quality player's on cheap fees, loans etc and manages to get the best out of them?

If he was foreign with a fancy-sounding name, and could crack a joke about Waitrose eggs and bird flu, I reckon he'd have the admiration on here that he deserves.
 
How about the fact he qualified a club similar in financial power to relagation battlers over the years like Bolton, Fulham, Blackburn and co, for CL football, UEFA Cup football, reached a cup final, consistently overachieves on a shoestring budget, and has shown savvy in the market to get quality player's on cheap fees, loans etc and manages to get the best out of them?

If he was foreign with a fancy-sounding name, and could crack a joke about Waitrose eggs and bird flu, I reckon he'd have the admiration on here that he deserves.

This is so true. maybe instead of proving what he can do by keeping a side like Everton he should move up to a Scottish League team and win a few titles.

Sure maybe instead we should get Pat Fenlon, Irish League team Bohemians manager. Won 3 leages in a row, has experience in CL football and is clearly a 'winner'.

At the rate some of these lads are going their will be no-one left if Mourinho wont do it. No-one else seems to be successful or high profile enough!
 
One thing to bear in mind about any new United manager is the fact that there has never been a Manager at this club outside of the British Isles. A lot of you might dismiss this, but I feel it would be important to bear this in mind when guessing who is going to be the next one. No matter what you think, being English/Scottish/Welsh/Irish would give you an advantage over the European manager.

They will clearly have a greater will to bring on young local players and give british players a better oportunity. I think that this should be beared in mind, as these are great traditions of the club which should not be forgotten about for short term gain. However I don't know how much our wonderful owners would worry about this.

(and im not a little englander, Im Irish b4 some of you accuse me of it)

We certainly have traditions and history to consider, that's why I think people like Bobby and Gill will veto him coming here.

Ehhh...? What's this bullshit about traditions? I look at Manchester United's squad and managerial team and I don't see any resemblance of a British tradition anywhere, nationality doesn't seem to be one of the criteria for working at United, why would this be a factor?

Regarding the fact that you never had a non-islander manager wouldn't that be because you have the same manager for 24 years and never needed to change? And that before that it was extremely uncommon for any non-british to coach (or play) in any English team (not a United tradition in particular). I just had a quick check but apparently until 1996 and the likes of Gullit, Houllier and Wenger no other of the big 4 had any tradition of non-islanders managers as well, and nowadays they all seem to ignore the nationality factor. And it would be daft not to, in my opinion.

Ridiculous logic.
 
Ehhh...? What's this bullshit about traditions? I look at Manchester United's squad and managerial team and I don't see any resemblance of a British tradition anywhere, nationality doesn't seem to be one of the criteria for working at United, why would this be a factor?

Regarding the fact that you never had a non-islander manager wouldn't that be because you have the same manager for 24 years and never needed to change? And that before that it was extremely uncommon for any non-british to coach (or play) in any English team (not a United tradition in particular). I just had a quick check but apparently until 1996 and the likes of Gullit, Houllier and Wenger no other of the big 4 had any tradition of non-islanders managers as well, and nowadays they all seem to ignore the nationality factor. And it would be daft not to, in my opinion.

Ridiculous logic.

I think you read the first line of my post and went of on your little rant, because you never touched on any of the issues I highlighted at all.

I'm not saying that I only want a British manager because they are so much better at managing than other nationalities, but the fact is that United are a British club, who play a very very British style of football. I for one would hate to see the philosophy of football here change, just because some Johnny come lately comes in with all the tactical bullshit that we know plays such a huge role in so many Leagues around Europe. United have always had the idea that if you score 2 we'll score 3, and that is what has drawn then support from around the world.

Also on my point about bringing in young British and Irish players and giving them every chance. Do you really believe that a foreign manager will give 1 shit about that tradition. Look at Wenger and see how many British players he has brought through. You mightn't think this is important, but for a team like man utd not to have any of its first team players coming from manchester would be sacrilege. IMO a british/irish manager would care more about this.
 
I think you read the first line of my post and went of on your little rant, because you never touched on any of the issues I highlighted at all.

I'm not saying that I only want a British manager because they are so much better at managing than other nationalities, but the fact is that United are a British club, who play a very very British style of football. I for one would hate to see the philosophy of football here change, just because some Johnny come lately comes in with all the tactical bullshit that we know plays such a huge role in so many Leagues around Europe. United have always had the idea that if you score 2 we'll score 3, and that is what has drawn then support from around the world.

Also on my point about bringing in young British and Irish players and giving them every chance. Do you really believe that a foreign manager will give 1 shit about that tradition. Look at Wenger and see how many British players he has brought through. You mightn't think this is important, but for a team like man utd not to have any of its first team players coming from manchester would be sacrilege. IMO a british/irish manager would care more about this.

As to the part in bold, yes, I apologize for not addressing the other points of the post, but the bulk of the question is my disagreement with the idea that that hypothetical "tradition" will have any kind of measurable impact on the decision to hire a new manager. The only tangible advantage a British manager would have above a continental one would be a greater knowledge of the Premier League and it's culture, but that advantage is not a factor when the continental manager is Mourinho.

Now what I will say next may have some errors or omissions because I'm not a United fan, most of what I know about United comes from what I read on the forums or the few games of United I watch each season on TV.

It seems to me that while not as blatant in United as it is on Arsenal or Chelsea that tradition of bringing up young British talent at United is not actual any more. Who are the relevant British players at United at the moment? Legends from an ageing generation, or strong players bought from other English teams, like Carrick, Rooney or Ferdinand. Sure I see some mentioning here and there of guys like Gibson and Cleverley but from what I've been seeing lately the first is not so much of a talent and Bebé or Obertan are quicker called upon than Cleverley... Your academy seems to be more and more aggressive on poaching international talents sooner and sooner so that United can comply with the home grown rule without having to resort to the mediocre English talent.

Let's face it, English talent, proportion wise to the size of the country and the impact of football on the society, is not nowhere near good enough as it should be. Whatever tradition you seem to find at United regarding British players seems to be on a very fast decline, and so it shall continue to be if United wants to keep being a top European side. Until you sort out whatever problem formation football has at England, that's the way it will be.

Mourinho never seemed to have anything against English players while at Chelsea, he always used the good ones he had at his disposition. But on lack of better options he went for international ones, and that's how any future manager at United, be him whoever he is, will have to do to maintain the team competitive.