- Joined
- Dec 31, 2007
- Messages
- 91,800
So how do you pronounce it?
Yanga Um-bee-waa?
Yanga Um-bee-waa?
They do know that they are allowed to buy players from outside of Ligue 1?
Montpellier's mad president wasn't best pleased about this transfer.
Agreed a fee with Bordeaux for Gouffran and with Nancy for Haidara too.
It's disingenuous, imo, to interpret his statement as an indictment against fielding even a majority of foreign players - he was specifically talking about the case of not fielding a single English player.
I can't think of a case this season or last where there hasn't been at least one starting and 3 or 4 total in the matchday squad. Until that time, it's just being silly to play "gotcha" games with quotes like that.
You can't really blame them for exploring French market. Two big signings they have made from Ligue 1 - Cabaye and Ben Arfa - are possibly their two best players. They also managed to pick them up for low fees compared to what they'd have to pay for a player of the same calibre in England. Debuchy was also signed for a relatively low fee and I expect him to be a success too.
They're cheap, they usually do well in France and all of them have played for successful French sides. Someone like Gouffran will probably only be a back up anyway, I have no idea who the Nancy guy is. To sign players of the same quality here would cost them two or three times as much.
He said that in 2006. A lot has changed since them - English players are even more expensive than they were back then and talent wise they have got significantly worse, English national team is in the worst shape since long, long ago.
You can have a look at Stoke who spend around £25m net on players each season, picking up mainly from within the country, and end up having a squad of rather poor physical players. I know they're above Newcastle but long term I'd expect Newcastle to have more success with this policy (as last season proved, it can work out).
Not sure about that tbh. Some good Young players coming through.
English national team players largely end up at bigger clubs anyway, if they move. It's those on the fringes that are a bit overpriced and even were back then.
It's interesting you point out Stoke because they haven't spent 25 million net and haven't bought English players either. They buy physical players to suit their style and not all fit in. It's a different model completely.
Swansea would be more similar to newcastle, i guess and they buy both from within and outside.
Stoke have spent close to £100m net since their promotion, roughly around £20m net a season. Maybe £25m was an overestimation but they do spend big money and it goes towards signing PL players.
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/premiership-transfers/stoke-city-transfers.html
More closer to 15 tbh.
They just buy a certain type of player with no worry of resale value. These are not that many English players either.
And it's not worked out that badly for them tbh. They've finished mid table for all the 4 seasons and also gone on 2 pretty good cup runs.
Their have been worse teams that have been relegated buying lesser known players and spending similar amounts like a Portsmouth even. The problem with Stoke however has been the fact that they have made some poor signings which they haven't used and also are unable to build on what they achieved now. Pulis has been found limited in that respect.
They're paying more than Newcastle while signing significantly worse players., that's my entire point. Newcastle have spent around £40m to build a team that is going to consist of Yanga-Mbiwa, Debuchy, Cabaye, Tiote, Ben Arfa and Cisse (those six cost slightly more than £30m in total) as well as solid players like Santon and Guttierez.
Oh, that i agree with. That's why i said they are struggling to go to the next level.
Newcastle have more pulling power outside of money anyways, but Stoke now having established themselves should look to do a Swansea.
Oh, that i agree with. That's why i said they are struggling to go to the next level.
Newcastle have more pulling power outside of money anyways, but Stoke now having established themselves should look to do a Swansea.
Gouffran is allergic to grass, with his allergy being described by his former coach, Jean Tigana, as "embarrassing".
There's a whisper that Newcastle are after Ricky van Wolfswinkel from Sporting Club de Portugal.
I'd sign him for his name alone.
I wonder how many of these players Newcastle get from France have a release clause in their contracts (a la Ba) *
*Not Alaba, but I mean like they did with Ba
Gouffran announces Newcastle move
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/s...-announces-newcastle-move-16264676.html?r=RSS
no way. There should be atleast one team in our league that plays like stoke does. Our league would be worse off without the agricultural football of Stoke and "wednesday night in the dead of winter at the britannia" would lose all meaning of stoke moved towards swansea style.
Rumors that they are after another french player.
AS Nancy left back Massadio Haidara being one and Toulouse midfielder Moussa another.
Moussa as Moussa Sissoko? That'd be a coup for Newcastle, he's excellent. Sissoko, Tiote and Cabaye in the middle would be a very strong combination, and Newcastle definitely need to add depth to their midfield.