SuperiorXI
Full Member
Is the outer netting for Dalots crossing?

Is the outer netting for Dalots crossing?
I thought it was a few hundred yards away?They could groundshare with City.
Is it being built on a different footprint to existing stadium?
I can't tell.
They could groundshare with City.
Is it being built on a different footprint to existing stadium?
I can't tell.
Does anyone know if the Spurs/Everton designs ended up much different to their initial concepts?
I don't think our rivalry with City changes that much in terms of potential groundsharing. But I haven't seen the quote you posted, indeed seems like they'd be trying to keep the Old Trafford going for the duration of construction.“Our current stadium has served us brilliantly for the past 115 years, but it has fallen behind the best arenas in world sport. By building next to the existing site, we will be able to preserve the essence of Old Trafford, while creating a truly state-of-the-art stadium that transforms the fan experience, only footsteps from our historic home."
Be real, there is absolutely zero chance of ground sharing with City. That would be a nightmare logistically outside of the fact that one of the world's biggest clubs are not going to go crawling to their arch rivals for a home for several years...
No, next door.but this is in place of Old Trafford right? so we'd need to find a place to play for 5 years - groundshare with City?
There is enough land to build it a few 100m away, and overcome the rail track issues.but this is in place of Old Trafford right? so we'd need to find a place to play for 5 years - groundshare with City?
This forum constantly reminds me how so much of our fanbase will find any reason at all to be negative.. I’m sure they’re all secretly happy when the rain falls through the roof.. get in! another reason to have a moan on Redcafe.
It’s like that bloke on the fast show..
“Bruno?….rubbish…..Ruben Amorim?? Ruben Amorwhat? .. rubbish!
100,000 seater state of the art stadium? .. that’s rubbish…”
Ours looks pretty much bang on but the design isn't as wild. Modern, and still impressive but simpler.Does anyone know if the Spurs/Everton designs ended up much different to their initial concepts?
Ours looks pretty much bang on but the design isn't as wild. Modern, and still impressive but simpler.
Have you seen the video where he talks it through? He talks about that.How many stadiums has Foster designed?
I personally loathe the design. But if your going for modern pretentious architecture with shared spaces etc it clearly ticks those boxes. Just hope some thought was actually given to football factors like atmosphere.
It's described as "next to" the existing stadium by SJR.but this is in place of Old Trafford right? so we'd need to find a place to play for 5 years - groundshare with City?
How many stadiums has Foster designed?
I personally loathe the design. But if your going for modern pretentious architecture with shared spaces etc it clearly ticks those boxes. Just hope some thought was actually given to football factors like atmosphere.
I work in the area, and no it doesn’t go with the local architecture. But none of the existing local buildings go together anyway.I really like the design, think it's fresh and quite inspiring. I've been to OT a couple of times but will leave it to the locals to decide whether it fits with the architecture in the area. But I find it rather nice
There is enough land to build it a few 100m away, and overcome the rail track issues.
It is what is needed IMHO; I am okay with the design but hope those 3 towers can be removed/reduced in height.
Would be great if they'd name each of the tridents after each on of the Holy Trinty