Nobody gives a feck about that shite.
Nobody gives a feck about that shite.
I don't think many from Europe have cared about the Club World Cup so far, really. They do in South America, to get one over the European giants - and obviously other continents wanted included as well. But it's never got much attention or respect in Europe.Said the uninvited
Is this going to happen every year?
How have Salzburg ended up as the next best choice?
4 CL winners from 2021-24 & 8 teams based on CL results from the same period. But at most two teams from the same country can qualify, if there’s not more than two actual CL winners from the same country that is.
Since Chelsea and City are already qualified through winning CL, Arsenal can only get in by winning CL this year. If Arsenal doesn't, either PSG, Bayern, City, BVB or Real will. And they’re all already qualified either through ranking or winning CL. This means that one extra spot will be available through ranking, and Salzburg are next in line after some decent results in CL between 2021-24.
How do Atletico have a higher co-efficent than Barca? Was being eliminated at the group stages last year that much of a swing or am I forgetting something else major?
Barcelona has a quarterfinal exit, a Ro16 exit and 2 group stage exits.
Atletico has 2 quarterfinal exits, a Ro16 exit and a group stage exit.
They're Mozart's boyhood club, they should be there.Arsenal knocked out.
It means Austrian team RB Salzburg will officially be in the competition alongside PSG, Inter, Juventus Chelsea, Man City Bayern Munich, Dortmund, Porto, Benfica, Real Madrid and Atlético Madrid.
It's clear something must change from next edition, will all due respect but it's a joke to see Salzburg instead of Barcelona or Liverpool
When's this actually going to be played, July 2025?
Considering internationals go deep into June now players are basically getting two weeks off at the best which isn't acceptable. For this tournament to actually work you need to end all domestic seasons by middle of May, have CL final around 22-23rd May as it used to be and then have internationals and then June is the proper rest period for players.
I guess the only thing is if clubs weren't playing this in America....they'd just be playing World club series friendlies in America but those are obviously lower intensity and at a shorter period.
Here's all the teams that have reached the Ro16 from 2020-21 to 2023-24 that would have been comparable (and eligible) and their 4-season performances:
Salzburg: Group Stage / Round of 16 / Group Stage / Group Stage
Ajax: Group Stage / Round of 16 / Group Stage / Not Qualified
Brugge: Group Stage / Group Stage / Round of 16 / Not Qualified
FCK: Not Qualified / Not Qualified / Group Stage / Round of 16
PSV: Not Qualified / Play-off Round / Play-off Round / Round of 16
Lille: Not Qualified / Round of 16 / Not Qualified / Not Qualified
Salzburg is the only team that has consistently made the group stage and no team has reached Ro16 more than once.
As "underwhelming" as Salzburg might be they are the best performer outside the 5 leagues with two teams and PSG.
Ridiculous competition for European clubs. I can understand it mattering more to sides from other federations. I suppose it'll pay more money.
Every 4 years, next one is 2029.Is this going to happen every year?
The money is actually quite significant. Just participation is said to guarantee 50M€ per club and that figure will scale upwards based on performance with the tournament winner reportedly earning up to a 100M€. Because of the amount of money involved I've got a feeling most clubs, even the European ones, will end up taking it quite seriously.
On paper I quite like the concept of a large-scale intercontinental club tournament but the scheduling is going to be a huge nightmare and sooner or later the overloaded players are going to end up paying the price.
Is it really that much? Holy shit, no wonder some Barsa talking heads were mentioning as an extra economic lever for them.The money is actually quite significant. Just participation is said to guarantee 50M€ per club and that figure will scale upwards based on performance with the tournament winner reportedly earning up to a 100M€. Because of the amount of money involved I've got a feeling most clubs, even the European ones, will end up taking it quite seriously.
On paper I quite like the concept of a large-scale intercontinental club tournament but the scheduling is going to be a huge nightmare and sooner or later the overloaded players are going to end up paying the price.
Yeah, the clubs are definitely going to be taking it seriously. It is essentially another CL injection of cash in the year they qualify.
As for the concept, I don't mind the idea if it allows the South American teams to get in a bit more cash so that they can keep their players for longer. My issue is why does this have to have 32 club? For me it should've been 8-16 clubs. This whole letting everybody have a go just dilutes everything- I mean just look at the Euros. At a 16 team tournament every game mattered, now the games only really matter from the KO stage, but even then you still have mismatches in the first KO.
That‘s half an Antony every four years. Not bad.Is it really that much? Holy shit, no wonder some Barsa talking heads were mentioning as an extra economic lever for them.
Is it really that much? Holy shit, no wonder some Barsa talking heads were mentioning as an extra economic lever for them.
Americans will use anything but the metric systemThat‘s half an Antony every four years. Not bad.
32 and 16 only make a difference of ONE game for the finalists.Yeah, the clubs are definitely going to be taking it seriously. It is essentially another CL injection of cash in the year they qualify.
As for the concept, I don't mind the idea if it allows the South American teams to get in a bit more cash so that they can keep their players for longer. My issue is why does this have to have 32 club? For me it should've been 8-16 clubs. This whole letting everybody have a go just dilutes everything- I mean just look at the Euros. At a 16 team tournament every game mattered, now the games only really matter from the KO stage, but even then you still have mismatches in the first KO.
I actually like the general concept of this tournament but increasing all of a sudden from 7 clubs to 32 is a bit much - a 16 team tournament is more than.enough
The money would be too much split between 16 every 4 years. It would make Bayern, Real etc.. (the teams who are guaranteed to be at the business end every 4 years) practically untouchable.
I actually like the general concept of this tournament but increasing all of a sudden from 7 clubs to 32 is a bit much - a 16 team tournament is more than.enough
32 and 16 only make a difference of ONE game for the finalists.
Who cares about the viewers? FIFA?Yeah, but not for the viewer and also the quality of the initial games. Having so many reduces the jepody.