Yagami
Good post resistant
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2013
- Messages
- 14,152
I already like him for going over to that fan @ 2:34
For all the players we'd been linked to at the beginning of the summer, he was the last player I was expecting to get.
It's hard to understand of why Chelsea was willing to sell him to United.
Chelsea were fools to sell him, just like real madrid were to sell makelele.
Most of their fanbase know it too. Some are in denial. Bakayoko is overrated and is not the finished article
He's my favorite type of player. Just sits slighty behind the play and is there to mop up any loose balls and play some simple passes to keep the ball rolling and the occasional switch/pass between the lines.
Reads the game so well. Just superb.
Even if we take out bakayako equation, it still doesn't make sense to sell your first choice midfielder. Had they even sold fabregas, it would have been understandable. This just doesn't make sense.
They can all say kante was the one running the show and matic was pedestrian blah blah but without matic even kante looks off in the pre seasons. They will miss matic.
Good comparisons. I'm more used to the Carrick mold of DM, so I do get a bit worried about what happens when Matic misses one of his tackles up the pitch. It might leave our defense exposed as I don't think he has the legs to recover. When he succeeds on the press though, which he did on every attempt, it gives us good attacking opportunities and keeps the pressure on.Difference between Carrick (even his prime) & Matic, is Carrick prefers to hold his position & backtracking than taking chance to put pressure to win the ball. Magic can make his presence felt on the pitch, while Carrick walk a thin line of sneaky intercepting passes & being passenger & invisible without the ball. Passing, Matic releases passing faster. Not electrifying exchanging, but faster than what Carrick likes. Carrick seems to prefer to hold on to the ball longer to pick a more beautiful pass while Matic can do simple pass most of the time to match the tempo of the play. The above leading to a vital difference is that Carrick is not that great or comfortable playing too high up the pitch. It's not that he's not fast enough to get back to defend a counter attacking (Matic is not faster), but due to Matic can help steal possession back higher up the pitch as well keep the ball moving quick enough so his teams have that bit of edge when the oppostion teams marker is half a step behind. Carrick type of DM is not always Mourinho's cup of tea.
Fair point that's what I see why Mourinho switching between Cesc (to dictate play better), Ramirez when needed to added more defensive shift at Chelsea, or both when Oscar not doing his job as no 10. For us I expect Herrera to offer a bit of both quality to partner Matic while Pogba was given more freedom to step up his game.Good comparisons. I'm more used to the Carrick mold of DM, so I do get a bit worried about what happens when Matic misses one of his tackles up the pitch. It might leave our defense exposed as I don't think he has the legs to recover. When he succeeds on the press though, which he did on every attempt, it gives us good attacking opportunities and keeps the pressure on.
With the ball, like you said, he has a quick release. He won't ever dictate the play from deep nor open up the pitch with long range passing, but we have Pogba for the latter. I would still like our midfield to have a player who can be the 'hub' for possession, like Scholes used to be.
Good comparisons. I'm more used to the Carrick mold of DM, so I do get a bit worried about what happens when Matic misses one of his tackles up the pitch. It might leave our defense exposed as I don't think he has the legs to recover. When he succeeds on the press though, which he did on every attempt, it gives us good attacking opportunities and keeps the pressure on.
With the ball, like you said, he has a quick release. He won't ever dictate the play from deep nor open up the pitch with long range passing, but we have Pogba for the latter. I would still like our midfield to have a player who can be the 'hub' for possession, like Scholes used to be.
Absolutely, I am in complete agreement with you here. We can't replace the likes of Scholes and Keane. Probably not even any two player pairing can accomplish everything they did.I think it is really rare to find someone with the complete attributes of a midfielder like Scholes did - maybe Verratti in this generation could come close. So rather than trying to find everything in a single player, we would be better off seeing two, three players who could mix and match the complete set every team needs.
Yep, I think they complement each other very well, and the combination of a defensive screen + grafter + playmaker is exactly what I wanted in a 3 man midfield. My only concern is that both Carrick and Scholes (especially the latter) had the ability to just set up camp in the opposition half and everything would go through them. Scholes was very adept at quickening the tempo, and he brought a confidence to our play because no one could get the ball off him and he was always available for the pass. At the moment we don't have anyone who can do those things, and even against weaker opposition we don't look assured in possession.That is the prime reason I hyped for a combination of Pogba - Matic - Herrera; they have contrasting qualities which would complement the other's deficiencies. Pogba being the flair player, capable of incisive play and becoming the auxiliary attacker by arriving late into the box; while Herrera would easily be the grafter - chasing down lost causes and trying to find the more attack minded players with simple passes while having some defensive contributions when not in possession.
Matic, by default, would be the defensive screen who would simply be tasked by breaking down the opponent's attacks and playing "the pass before the main pass", if that makes sense!
Depends on what you mean by that. If you're looking for a guy who completely dictates play from deep, we don't have anyone who can do that other than pogba who'll be wasted that deep now that we have Matic and Herrera both. On the other hand, if you're looking for someone who's always available to receive the pass, is good at keeping the ball under the press and move it on quickly, Herrera is very good at it.I would still like our midfield to have a player who can be the 'hub' for possession, like Scholes used to be.
I think in this trio that will have to come from Matic, Herrera and Pogba working closely together to ensure at least one of them is available for a pass at all times, and that they are able to confidently circulate the ball amongst themselves. Maybe it will develop as they get more playing time as a unit.
Yeah, mostly the latter. Someone who can always be given the ball and will make sure we don't lose possession. Of the three, I think Herrera is closest to it. However, he doesn't really roam the pitch making himself available and have the presence that makes the rest of the team happy to surrender the ball to him when they run into trouble. He's just not that dominant a player and I don't think he ever will be.Depends on what you mean by that. If you're looking for a guy who completely dictates play from deep, we don't have anyone who can do that other than pogba who'll be wasted that deep now that we have Matic and Herrera both. On the other hand, if you're looking for someone who's always available to receive the pass, is good at keeping the ball under the press and move it on quickly, Herrera is very good at it.
jesus, our midfield really has been a joke for quite some time. False dawn of the Schmidfield weekend aside I think I'd agree with this.First time after keane-scholes- veron era, i am delighted with our midfield.
Yeah, mostly the latter. Someone who can always be given the ball and will make sure we don't lose possession. Of the three, I think Herrera is closest to it. However, he doesn't really roam the pitch making himself available and have the presence that makes the rest of the team happy to surrender the ball to him when they run into trouble. He's just not that dominant a player and I don't think he ever will be.
I agree, but against the weaker teams (which is most of our games) we're generally going to dominate the possession whether we plan for it or not. Even Mourinho's Chelsea teams had plenty of the ball against bottom half teams, it's mostly against better opposition that he sets up more reactively.That also depends on what coach wants, if Jose isn't all that for possession football then it's of no use. It's always good to have players who are very good on the ball and available for passes but we also need midfielders who can break into the box like Lampard did.
I agree, but against the weaker teams (which is most of our games) we're generally going to dominate the possession whether we plan for it or not. Even Mourinho's Chelsea teams had plenty of the ball against bottom half teams, it's mostly against better opposition that he sets up more reactively.
A 3 man midfield should be fairly complete, so we should have someone who can break into the box and score goals, and also someone who can give confidence to the team in possession. This is especially important for us right now as the team goes into its shell and looks bereft of confidence and ideas when the 'easy' games go poorly.
Yeah, the backups are definitely an issue. Carrick is looking off the pace at the moment so hopefully he can improve as usual over the course of the season. Pereira is inexperienced but I think he can do a job. Fellaini has his talents but never slots into a midfield role particularly well. We need Matic, Herrera and Pogba to all remain as injury free as possible.The way you put it seems great for me; but the problem we would then have is the fact that we are gonna have Carrick, Fellaini and Pereira as backups for the midfield roles. While Carrick, when played cautiously, would give us solid defensive screening, Fellaini and Pereira do not offer as much as Pogba and Herrera would.
Difference between Carrick (even his prime) & Matic, is Carrick prefers to hold his position & backtracking than taking chance to put pressure to win the ball. Matic can make his presence felt on the pitch, while Carrick walk a thin line of sneaky intercepting passes and being passenger thus invisible without the ball. Passing wise, Matic releases passese faster. Not electrifying exchanging, but faster than what Carrick likes. Carrick seems to prefer to hold on to the ball longer to pick a more beautiful pass while Matic can do simple pass most of the time to match the tempo of the play. The above leading to a vital difference is that Carrick is not that great or comfortable playing too high up the pitch. It's not that he's not fast enough to get back to defend a counter attacking (Matic is not faster), but due to Matic can help stealing possession back higher up the pitch as well keep the ball moving quick enough so his teams have that bit of edge when the oppostion teams marker is half a step behind. Carrick type of DM is not always Mourinho's cup of tea.
Was fantastic last night but his excellence also highlighted a huge shortcoming for us as a team- the left hand side- if we had someone either a left back or left winger (and i mean proper winger) for him him to feed his passes into once he has broken up the play then we would look a lot more dangerous- being naturally left footed it's where he most likely to look as he did last night- but it was nearly always a simple pass either out to left or right because the option was never there for something a little more inviting. He had the odd one out to Tony V but as i don't think 3-5-2 will be our formation that he won't have that option as much and we will still seem as static going forward. I'd take a winger either side but if we want to use his distribution a little more fully i think the left is where we are short.
I of course could be talking utter nonsense but it was the feeling i got as i was watching him. As a dm though that was a masterclass in breaking up play, he has more tools in his box though and it would be a shame not to utilise them. He's a beautiful footballer.
A Kante-Bakayoko midfield is horrendous in terms of creativity. They will need Fabregas.
Matic will be a class signing. Never got the reason why so many were against him. Maybe its' because we are used to seeing him and his name doesn't end in "inho".
The way you put it seems great for me; but the problem we would then have is the fact that we are gonna have Carrick, Fellaini and Pereira as backups for the midfield roles. While Carrick, when played cautiously, would give us solid defensive screening, Fellaini and Pereira do not offer as much as Pogba and Herrera would.
And that being said, I am hard pressed to believe yesterday's 3-5-2 is the ideal formation to extract the best of these players. What's your take on the formations that Jose should use?
@jojojo and @Saf94 - what are your opinions?