Does that mean that he was only willing to lift his no trade clause for the Suns?
Yep this has been reported by multiple people:
Does that mean that he was only willing to lift his no trade clause for the Suns?
He seems to think that way. Maybe he’s friends with some of the players? There’s countless possible reasons really.
We should be clear, the Suns took 2 games off the Nuggets with Chris Paul injured for 4.5 games of that series and Ayton injured game 6. The Heat with all of the hype took 1 game, the Lakers were swept aside like roaches. Replace CP3 with Beal and that series goes 7 most likely. Does this trade make them better than the Nuggets currently, no, but with FA still to come and Ayton as an asset if they find a good deal, we don't know what the final roster will look like. I don't think you can say the Heat are a better fit as a result. Maybe the Bucks but they have a lot of question marks with Lopez and Middleton both FAs. So it makes a lot of sense to go to the Suns where Book and KD are under contract for years to come.
Magic have no need for a center though, Carter is perfectly adequate - unless they trade Carter and no. 6 for no. 3 which has been rumored as well (with Blazers then shifting no. 6 for another player).
Pacers won't want him anymore I reckon, Turner had a good season.
Suns were visibly better without Paul (for whom getting an injury during playoffs is the norm) and Ayton was a non-factor throughout the series to the point that Landale was being preferred down the stretch at times. The two games Suns won were with insane performances from Booker, and one from Durant, so it was unsustainable.
Having Beal, while letting go off two players, will still not make them favorites for me as they will have to fill out the roster with not a lot of cap space. Add to that the injury issues for Durant and Beal.
Ya im just mentioning teams that have been linked more recently with Ayton. Wendell Carter is on one of the best contracts in the league and can't see the Magic pairing Ayton with two other big forwards in PB and FW, while like you say, Turner may not be as likely to move as previously. Although the Pacers went as far as tending an offer sheet to Ayton last year so they clearly like him to some extent, the new CBA makes it difficult for them to make a deal work I reckon. Just don't think the market seems to be very good at the moment for Ayton that the Suns need to rush a deal, there will be multiple good players they likely can get on a vet min and they still have a 12 mil dollar buyout exception from what I was reading that will be valid next season due to the way they are phasing in the CBA, which can be used to sign a good player mid-season.
I agree, you are not getting a haul back for a center on an expensive deal currently so you may as well wait and see rather than take 50 cents on the dollar.
From Blazers perspective I'd rather throw a contract at Brook Lopez or someone cheaper in free agency rather than spend assets to acquire centers. Nurkic is fine but he's hardly ever fully healthy.
I can see cp returning but the issue with their cap space still remains in acquiring some actual depth. seems more like a recipe for disaster. especially when you take into account how injury-prone kd and beal are.They haven't really given up much for Beal. Shamet you can replace quite cheaply.
Free agency is coming up in two weeks time, they won't have much trouble filling out the roster with ring chasers and younger players who may fancy spending one year with a contender. They will be fine.
I don't think CP3 can return there by current rules. If he gets bought out, he can't go back to the team that traded him but I'm not sure how the season switching to 2023-24 impacts that (I'm pretty sure it's a calendar year rule though).I can see cp returning but the issue with their cap space still remains. seems more like a recipe for disaster. especially when you take into account how injury prone kd and beal are.
I'm really hoping you guys get a good trade to keep Dame in Portland, always admired Dame for sticking around and being loyal (a city I live in currently) unlike a lot of other stars (KD, Beal as two examples) who run away to chase rings. There are already reports of the Heat waiting for Dame to demand a trade in the event the Blazers can't turn the 3rd pick into something meaningful. Then again, like you alluded to earlier, maybe it will be better to start fresh and I really like what I've seen from Scoot Henderson, definitely think he can be the next great PG and someone to build around.
Imagine being a talented player and having a contract there.The more I think about the trade the more I can't get over how incompetent the Wizards are. I'd be furious if I was a fan.
We were winning game 2 till CP3 went off injured. It’s a different series if CP3 stayed healthy.Suns were visibly better without Paul (for whom getting an injury during playoffs is the norm) and Ayton was a non-factor throughout the series to the point that Landale was being preferred down the stretch at times. The two games Suns won were with insane performances from Booker, and one from Durant, so it was unsustainable.
Having Beal, while letting go off two players, will still not make them favorites for me as they will have to fill out the roster with not a lot of cap space. Add to that the injury issues for Durant and Beal.
Wait, he gets to have a say on who gets included in the deal for him as well? That’s a crazy level of control.
We should be clear, the Suns took 2 games off the Nuggets with Chris Paul injured for 4.5 games of that series and Ayton injured game 6. The Heat with all of the hype took 1 game, the Lakers were swept aside like roaches. Replace CP3 with Beal and that series goes 7 most likely. Does this trade make them better than the Nuggets currently, no, but with FA still to come and Ayton as an asset if they find a good deal, we don't know what the final roster will look like. I don't think you can say the Heat are a better fit as a result. Maybe the Bucks but they have a lot of question marks with Lopez and Middleton both FAs. So it makes a lot of sense to go to the Suns where Book and KD are under contract for years to come.
We were winning game 2 till CP3 went off injured. It’s a different series if CP3 stayed healthy.
Draymond opting out and will be unrestricted. Not sure what he's hoping for here. 33, a whole load of intangibles but clearly past his best and declining tangibles.
Porzingis has a player option for $36m next year, not sure whether he picks that up or not. He probably won't get the same annual salary in open market but may get a longer deal (like $120m / 4 years maybe).What are the Wizards going to do with KP and Kuzma?
I've only recently been familiarizing myself with the new CBA and it actually makes this deal baffling from Suns perspective as well. They have almost guaranteed being above the second tax apron for the next few years (I think new CBA kicks in in 2024-25 so quite soon) which means they won't be able to use any exceptions or sign buyout players at all, it's just minimum players to fill out the roster. Beal's no-trade clause has also carried to Suns so they won't be able to get rid of him if he starts declining (which he already has, just not that rapidly yet).
I like those new rules. At least it won't be the big market teams / contenders accumulating all talent, and teams will need to actually think before extending their players as going above second tax apron has severe consequences now.
Yep this has been reported by multiple people:
That's how I understand it. The issue isn't the tax, though it's an issue, it's the inability to fill the roster with decent players unless those free agents are willing to give serious discounts. Some teams better not be sleepwalking until next offseason because two things are likely to happen, getting fleeced by teams who know that you are desperate to get rid of contracts or find yourself with a very small roster.
And I agree with you, the new CBA could create great opportunities for teams that do not have big contracts or stars on their roster, next season or by 2025 everyone should have a star player
Is there some limitations to how low player can go for on his own will? Like if, lets say X player becomes free agent from 50 mil per year and his worth is still 50, can he go and sign for someone for 1mil if he feels like it?
Porzingis has a player option for $36m next year, not sure whether he picks that up or not. He probably won't get the same annual salary in open market but may get a longer deal (like $120m / 4 years maybe).
Kuzma has a $13m player option that he certainly will not pick up, so he will be a free agent in the offseason. No chance he resigns with Wizards under current circumstances, they should have traded him last February.
I thought the Zion pornstar stuff was like social clickbait.... it may well actually be, but there seems like some kind of possible legitimacy to it
I've only recently been familiarizing myself with the new CBA and it actually makes this deal baffling from Suns perspective as well. They have almost guaranteed being above the second tax apron for the next few years (I think new CBA kicks in in 2024-25 so quite soon) which means they won't be able to use any exceptions or sign buyout players at all, it's just minimum players to fill out the roster. Beal's no-trade clause has also carried to Suns so they won't be able to get rid of him if he starts declining (which he already has, just not that rapidly yet).
I like those new rules. At least it won't be the big market teams / contenders accumulating all talent, and teams will need to actually think before extending their players as going above second tax apron has severe consequences now.
Awesome player when he’s healthy but he’s just never healthy. Do I have any confidence in him recovering at Blazers to a point where he can complete a playoffs series? Not even close.@Sarni zion??? this would be such a blazers move it’s not even funny anymore
Is there some limitations to how low player can go for on his own will? Like if, lets say X player becomes free agent from 50 mil per year and his worth is still 50, can he go and sign for someone for 1mil if he feels like it?
He has only one year on his contract and I’ve always been of the view that for us to win anything or get close we would need to have a player very close to or above Dame’s level next to him. He’s not that.