mav_9me
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2009
- Messages
- 13,086
I don't really know what to make of last night's game because I would expect Tatum to be more efficient but then I'm not sure I would expect White and Smart to shoot as well while I don't imagine that Boston will defend Curry the way they did in the first quarter but at the same time I would expect Klay and Poole to at least have some better games. Huge win for the Celtics though, it means that whatever situation they find themselves in in this series they will believe that they can find a way out of it and it's certainly given me pause for thought because the last 2 Miami games had made me really question whether the Celtics were going to execute if the games were tight and they certainly did last night.I was thinking all game the fact that C's could stay in the game with Tatum shooting so badly speaks volumes. Warriors relied on Curry's brilliance far too much, the difference when he wasn't on the floor was night and day. I don't think Warriors will be able to cope with the C's defensive pressure over 7 games.
I don't really know what to make of last night's game because I would expect Tatum to be more efficient but then I'm not sure I would expect White and Smart to shoot as well while I don't imagine that Boston will defend Curry the way they did in the first quarter but at the same time I would expect Klay and Poole to at least have some better games. Huge win for the Celtics though, it means that whatever situation they find themselves in in this series they will believe that they can find a way out of it and it's certainly given me pause for thought because the last 2 Miami games had made me really question whether the Celtics were going to execute if the games were tight and they certainly did last night.
In part I'm trying to convince myself that I still believe in my pre-series prediction of Warriors in 6 but you're absolutely right about this Boston team and the series being basically over if they win again on Sunday.Celtics definitely shot way better from three than they are going to for the series, however Tatum will get better and they will probably get more points through drives. Warriors shot as well as you could expect them to from three but similar to Celtics not that well from two.
All the pressure is now on Warriors as if they go to Boston down 2-0 then it's basically done. I keep expecting Boston to regress, as does everyone seemingly but they keep performing at an extremely high level that cannot really be explained. I mean they were not even close to being contenders for any of the previous three seasons and literally the only significant thing that changed is that they got rid of score first point guards and got pass first point guards (+ Horford returned but damn, that guy was considered bad contract for the previous 18 months!). They are just such a solid team where everybody contributes, with almost no bench but the bench players who get to play have produced extremely well.
That first 75 seconds of the 4th would indicate the Warriors weren't going to let what happened on Thursday happen tonight. The Celtics were going to have a game like this at some stage, they've had a couple in each of the last 2 rounds, but tonight with things evening up sets the rest of the series up nicely.Surely we can hold on to this lead?
What's sad from a Warrior's point of view, is that apart from one excellent quarter where the Celtics played out of their skin the Dubs could easily have been up 2-0.That first 75 seconds of the 4th would indicate the Warriors weren't going to let what happened on Thursday happen tonight. The Celtics were going to have a game like this at some stage, they've had a couple in each of the last 2 rounds, but tonight with things evening up sets the rest of the series up nicely.
Does Skip Bayless ever discuss sports in a normal manner? It appears to me, every time he opens his mouth its got to be some sort of hot take. After game 1 he called Curry a choker and tonight he was ragging on Jayson Tatum. Curry is leading the Dubs in scoring at 31.5 ppg and shooting 46% from 3, while Tatum led the Celtics in scoring tonight and was 6-9 from 3. Bayless has actually become just a parody of himself and continues to spout ridiculous nonsense.
I don't often agree with Kevin Durant but he's right when he says that these talking heads having changed basketball for the worse.
Yep.Warriors in 6 looks right.
Bayless, Stephen A, and other hot take morons are just a reflection of their audience who lap up that shit passed as analysis.
There are analysts out there who break the game down in a knowledgeable way without resorting to nonsense like "choked" and "bottled", but they aren't as popular, so they don't get the limelight.
It's the same in football (soccer) too. NFL does a much better job I think, going all the way back to Madden.
I'm not sure what you want from Jordan Poole. He had 17 points off the bench and shot over 50% from 3. As to the the two threes he hit at the end of the third quarter. They were daggers. The Warriors were up by 17 at the time and had just thrown away a 15 point lead in game 1. I'm sure Boston didn't think they were out of it at that point. After the game 1 debacle, I certainly didn't.Tbh Steph is carrying the team in this series so far.
Warriors lost the first game because Kerr in his wisdom decided to rest both Steph and Wiggins at the start of the 4th quarter. They were 12 points up then, when he brought them back, there was a 4 point deficit.
Even in this game, Klay was terrible. As was Poole, leaving aside the two 3s he got in the final minute of the 3rd quarter by which point the Cs has given up.
GP2 coming back is big for the Warriors. Having him makes their defense work against this Celtics team.
As for predictions,
Warriors take this if between Klay and Poole, they have 2 good shooting games (not in the same game)
Celtics win this in 6 if Steph is the only one scoring on the Warriors
Game 3 and 4 will go to Boston, Game 5 to GSW and then Boston to seal it in Game 6
The bookmakers now have the Dubs as favorites again, although it really is the toss of coin now. They have the Warriors at -115 and the Celtics at -105.
If the Dubs are going to win the finals, they are going to have to continue their streak of 26 consecutive series of winning at least one road game.
2-2 after the two games in Boston hopefully and then… ok corral.
ESPN turned sports shows into this and it makes it worse. When Stephen A is doing pre-game or post-game with Jaylen Rose, Wilbon, etc., he's loud, but he's usually much more measured and objective. He's a really smart dude and is a very good writer/journalist. But ESPN has created this persona of him, especially Bayless, where it's hot takes and taking sides and being partisan, just so they and then the media have a lot of 'drama' and conversation that sets the tone for their agenda throughout the day and days ahead.
NFL toots their horn way, way too much (i.e Kapernick getting a "tryout"). NFL isn't that relevant during the spring, outside the draft. They make such a huge discussion about Super Bowl runs in spring/summer, which never works out because the season is so far ahead into the future and rosters haven't been totally constructed and of course, injuries haven't taken their toll on championship caliber teams.
In this case, both teams are odds on which means you would have to bet $115 on the Warriors to win $100 and $105 on the Celtics to win $100.How do those odds work? I see it during both NHL and NBA games now but I can't figure it out. How much would I get if I bet $10 on either team?