Mykhailo Mudryk / signs 8.5yr deal at Chelsea

Status
Not open for further replies.
CannonBalls said:
That is not how it works...
Assuming a player is purchased for 85m on 8.5year contract then for FFP terms its 10m/yr + salary.

So if he is sold after 2.5yrs his book value is 60m. If he gets sold for more then the profit is recorded for that same year and same goes for the loss
Click to expand...
They're not paying the transfer fee over 8.5 years so FFP for this year should use the initial transfer fee whatever they've paid up front
 
They’re clearly using these contract lengths to sort out their FFP I.E amortisation going forward but feck me, they’ll come back to bite them hard!
 
Castia said:
I haven’t seen this lad play but I’ve seen a stat saying he’s scored a total of 9 goals in the Ukrainian league….how can someone be valued at 100m after 9 fecking goals and 29 appearances

Disaster written all over this
Click to expand...
He does look very good from footage, very talented and pacy. But then Antony does look very talented on footage too, so we will have to see.
 
BlueHaze said:
@ThierryHenry14

Don't let my username confuse you, it's stoner reference, not chelsea!!!
Click to expand...
Haha......I got it now. Too bad we missed out on him but it is not his fault Arsenal didnt pay up to meet Shahtkar's asking price. In no circumstances he should reject Chelsea's offer and the only offer on the table.
 
ThierryHenry14 said:
Haha......I got it now. Too bad we missed out on him but it is not his fault Arsenal didnt pay up to meet Shahtkar's asking price. In no circumstances he should reject Chelsea's offer and the only offer on the table.
Click to expand...
That's exactly what I'm saying. I think he would develop better at Arsenal than Chelsea. Future will tell but he really suited your current system and setup.
 
BlueHaze said:
That's exactly what I'm saying. I think he would develop better at Arsenal than Chelsea. Future will tell but he really suited your current system and setup.
Click to expand...
Potter did really well in Brighton with very good football as well. It probably will take a bit longer to integrate so many new players in the team. They got so many great talents in the team just this transfer window.
 
CannonBalls said:
That is not how it works...
Assuming a player is purchased for 85m on 8.5year contract then for FFP terms its 10m/yr + salary.

So if he is sold after 2.5yrs his book value is 60m. If he gets sold for more then the profit is recorded for that same year and same goes for the loss
Click to expand...

So the profit/loss is captured over the year Rather than being allocated to the length of the time at the club. Very risky indeed.
 
NoPace said:
On the break, absolutely.

Against a team parking the bus, he'll have to learn. He's not special laterally or with his delivery, but he just turned 22, so has time to improve the latter.
Click to expand...

Sounds just like Pulisic....
 
They keep buying the same type of players. Does this mean the days are numbered for some of their players, or are they just utterly clueless and buying who others scout? I remember back in the day city, and actually Chelsea, always seemed to buy players United had been scouting.
 
skysports-mykhailo-mudryk-chelsea_6024762.jpg
 
Idxomer said:
10 goals and 8 assists in 24 games this season, that's a very good output for a winger and 5 of those were in the CL.
Click to expand...

Ok but 100M? He’s literally never scored a league goal before this season
 
whitbyviking said:
They keep buying the same type of players. Does this mean the days are numbered for some of their players, or are they just utterly clueless and buying who others scout? I remember back in the day city, and actually Chelsea, always seemed to buy players United had been scouting.
Click to expand...
Potter checking his inbox tomorrow morning and seeing this from Boehly

image-1.png
 
SirAnderson said:
First time I'm hearing about this player, is he any good?
Click to expand...
He's great but not even close to 100 mil great. Really exciting young player with a decently well goalscoring and creative output and a Bale-esque pace. An 8,5 half years deal seems like a risky deal all things considered but it looks like Chelsea prioritised their books (as a way to spread the transfer fee amortization) over their, well, brains.
 
Edwards6 said:
They're not paying the transfer fee over 8.5 years so FFP for this year should use the initial transfer fee whatever they've paid up front
Click to expand...
Not how it works..
Players are considered as assets just like cars or laptops and written down over the period of their contact. The payment schedule only affects cashflow.
 
duffer said:
I think it was 1.5 billion that was promised with the takeover. Didn't think it'd all come at once!
Click to expand...

Yes - over the next decade for both on and off the pitch.

You lot will be complaining when that stops fully in a couple of years.
 
I still can't get over eight and a half years. That's effectively his career. If he doesn't work out and wants to leave he's stuffed.

FFP dodging sure but it's an insane move.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.