Fair, had I known about the sensitivity on this and the state of posters here I would definitely have prefaced that my ideas about Musk aren't very well informed.
So you've entered a discussion with an ignorant opinion (not meant as an insult, just stating a fact that you yourself have confirmed) by stating that "the idea that Musk is a fascist is just delusional", effectively insulting those who have been more infomed about the topic. Then when people offer correctives / information / facts about actions etc you believe you're being aggressively attacked.
Please, can you go through and quote these aggressive attacks?
The replies I see:
- Oh we’ve got a live one here. Is it going to be a drive by or will we see another post explaining why? - Not exactly productive, but asking for greater detail
- Yes! Everyone agreeing what a monumental prick he is was getting boring!!! - No attack here
- As the old saying goes: If it looks like a fascist, swims like a fascist, and quacks like a fascist, then it probably is an autistic - No attack here
- Oh right so you’re selective with the bits you follow? What about the other, more fascisty bits? - Asking about your level of knowledge on the topic, not exactly an attack
- What about the salutes? Was that an accident? - Genuine question
- Totally preposterous the idea that the intellectually void, bitter, drug-addled twat, raised by a bunch of fascist South Africans, might himself be a fascist. - 'Attacking' Musk, sure, but offered a link to an article with more information on the man
- FFS

- Your comment wasto suggest that looking at facts is 'selective', this is not an attack
- Oh a coincidence. You’re good with the explanations. What about all the white suprematist material he personally promotes on his own platform? - Responding to you saying a Nazi salute by a man supporting the Far Right AfD was just a coincidene - not an attack
- He literally bans people on his platform for hurty words, and isn't elected yet is interfering in government affairs. You have to be trolling

- Inflamatory, maybe, but offers facts to back up their position
- Did he explain why he believes in great replacement theory? - No attack here
- Oh please don't do that. Just go and watch some cartoons, video game, or go for a walk, or something, anything, anything else. Please. - Possibly viewed as an attack
- Oh how I'd love to also live under a rock. - Suggesting you were ill-informed, which you've subsequently admitted
- Here's some important reading, explaining the type of fascism him and Peter Thiel are after. - Offered information, no attack here
- When Calvin Robinson did something similar - the Church literally kicked him out. Do you think they were wrong to do so? - Gives another example of the clearly inflamatory salute - no attack
- Herregud mann... Wake up, your big hero is a pathetic Far Right conspiracy pushing moron. Also, the idea that Musk would genuinely believe that Trump/GOP are the ones to back when it comes to free speech and democracy is absurd. Or maybe, he just watched Seinfeld and thought to himself: "I will do the OPPOSITE"! - not especially great, but attacking Musk, not you
- To be fair, if you don't follow topics surrounding Musk you could actually believe the tired narrative that he is a a genius and honest human being. Now that belief stops the moment you see him interact with anyone that isn't pandering. It also stops if you follow him on Twitter. - a description of reality
- I'm pretty sure this guy has been helicoptering into this thread for years at this point acting completely oblivious to whatever the current nonsense Musk is up to and claiming he's da best. - was seen as an attack but later admitted thinking you were someone else
You said you entered the thread to enlighten yourself, your actions showed you entered the thread to claim that people suggesting Musk was fascistic were 'delusional'. Thus far you have not provided any action, source, or evidence to back up your view there, whilst others have given plentiful examples. And you see this as an attack on
you.
Why?