Mourinho says it will be difficult to catch City next season

This is a fair point and something the club should consider.

It seems the club is tilting towards backing Mourinho and wanting to win the league yet they aren’t willing to pony up vs our direct rivals in order to give ourselves a realistic chance. One foot in - one foot out? Weird stance considering they are backing him and aren’t willing to go to the lengths to fulfil things.

(And for those who mention, no this is not SAF and there will never be another SAF. Times are changing so don’t bother making the comparison)

Are you seriously going to pretend that the club isn't backing Mourinho financially?
 
It was a long time ago and memory is hazy.
But did SAF lose the title to Jose for both seasons that Jose was with CFC? He only won the title in Jose's 3rd season, when Jose got fired. SAF never beat Jose in a title race, when Jose completed the season.
Correct me if I am wrong about this.

IF, I am correct about the above, then we cannot wait for Pep to leave MCFC, before winning the title again. We need to win the title, while Pep is still at MCFC.

EDIT:


Yep. I just checked SAF did beat Jose in Jose's final full season.
The point still stands though, we need to make things happen and can't wait for MCFC to suffer a drop in form. We need to push hard for the title, IMO. The title is the next stage of our progression under Jose.

:lol::lol:
 
This is a fair point and something the club should consider.

It seems the club is tilting towards backing Mourinho and wanting to win the league yet they aren’t willing to pony up vs our direct rivals in order to give ourselves a realistic chance. One foot in - one foot out? Weird stance considering they are backing him and aren’t willing to go to the lengths to fulfil things.

(And for those who mention, no this is not SAF and there will never be another SAF. Times are changing so don’t bother making the comparison)
I don't really see any evidence that he's not being backed fully. He spent a huge amount of money, the club got him Sánchez in January, the only thing he can point at is the Fellaini saga (how depressing that there is one) and that we didn't cave in to Inter's ridiculous demands for an average left winger - instead of whom, I repeat, we managed to get Alexis Sánchez.
 
Are you seriously going to pretend that the club isn't backing Mourinho financially?

No I know they are. I’m just saying they aren’t able to compete with City’s Sheikh money which some are turning a blind eye to and implying it shouldn’t make a difference when in fact it is a massive difference.
 
He'd win the league but I doubt he'd win the CL, let alone 2. This squad we have now is good but it's still unbalanced.
SAF unfortunately came up against the best Barca team for donkey year twice. He didn't win the number of CL's his talents deserved.
 
He’s done better but had a better squad what’s so hard to figure out? Jose has done well also. Let’s turn this around and say why can’t people accept or at least acknowledge Jose is doing a very good job without bringing Peo into it. It’s inevitable people will compare them but the smart people in my book are the ones who measure the improvements from the starting bases they took over.
You mentioned Jesus but he is fighting and often benched for Augero. Jose has not had this luxury in his squad unless you count the left wing with Martial Sanchez and Rashford. Three of our so called best players all in the same position. That’s how bad our squad balance is. Pep has a £50m pounds player in every position (even subs) whilst we have Valencia and Shaw propping is up in our first 11 and last season it was Zlatan or even Carrick for a spell. Not to mention Rooney who had fallen of a cliff with performances. None of this was Jose mess yet he’s getting battered for it.
yeah because Luke Shaw was bought for peanuts right? Mourinho bought Sanchez FFS, he made that squad imbalance. Mourinho was actually applauded for getting rid off Rooney.

As for the bolded part of your post, Mourinho himself brought on the Guardiola comparison by banging on about how Guardiola had all the stars and how he had nothing. If we had De Bruyne, Aguero and Silva when Mourinho took over, De Bruyne would be as inconsistent as Pogba has been, Silva would look just like Mata has looked and Aguero would be chasing long balls all season, that's the type of football Mourinho knows.
 
So what's the narrative now? Are we still going for the freak season where we would have won the title in every other season?

Or we've abandoned that now for the City have a god squad impossible to make up a 16 point difference (btw that difference was 0 points before Mourinho joined). The gap between Chelsea and Man City last season was 15 points.
 
United have not flatlined and have improved drastically with José.

I would really like to have the Cool Aid you are drinking because somehow we are not watching the same team performances week in week out that I am and many other fans.
 
It is very frustrating not being able to compete with City. We're never able to beat them on fee, agent fee, and wages when both clubs go for the same player, never. And we certainly never get that player, either. We don't have the highest wage bill in the league, we haven't broken the world transfer record on a player, we haven't broken the PL transfer record on a player, either. We always miss out on the players Mourinho wants.
 
But if that's the case, if we're already resigning ourselves to City dominating because they have a better squad and more money then José Mourinho is probably the worst possible choice as a manager, after the likes of David Moyes. He can't get this team to be more than the sum of its parts - he can barely even get it to be the sum of its parts - and he can't outspend his main rival. The best chequebook manager has the biggest chequebook in the league so then what's the point of sticking with the utterly dreary, unwatchable football of the second best chequebook manager? Are we just going to wait until Guardiola fecks off and hope that City royally screw up their next managerial appointment so we can win the league by default? That's not a terrible plan, don't get me wrong, but then let's get a manager with whom we can actually enjoy the football while we're waiting for City's implosion.

If we've given up on competing with City then there's literally no point in keeping Mourinho. None whatsoever.
Great post. The club should sack Mourinho then if we are not going to win the league under him. I was ready to forgo my enjoyment of our football only if we were winning major titles. If that’s not even on the table, then Jose can FECK off.

We should get in a top attacking coach while we wait for Pep to leave. At least, our football would be pleasing to the eye and I can enjoy watching United again.
 
It is very frustrating not being able to compete with City. We're never able to beat them on fee, agent fee, and wages when both clubs go for the same player, never. And we certainly never get that player, either. We don't have the highest wage bill in the league, we haven't broken the world transfer record on a player, we haven't broken the PL transfer record on a player, either. We always miss out on the players Mourinho wants.
I won't matter who we sign, even a Neymar if we cannot turn them into a functioning team.
 
Good post. Some are underrating our squad to defend Jose but on the other hand some are overrating Fergie a bit to have a pop at Jose.
Overrating Alex Ferguson? The man won a title with the likes of Cleverly and Anderson playing huge roles, Mourinho would cause a fall out with everyone and get himself fired if he were ever to deal with a similar situation. It's the Mourinho fanboys who are willing to fling mud on our legends to defend the self declared special one.
 
Great post. The club should sack Mourinho then if we are not going to win the league under him. I was ready to forgo my enjoyment of our football only if we were winning major titles. If that’s not even on the table, then Jose can FECK off.

We should get in a top attacking coach while we wait for Pep to leave. At least, our football would be pleasing to the eye and I can enjoy watching United again.
So we should tell him to fe.k of if we think or the club thinks he won't win the title. And lets bring an attacking coach just to enjoy football even if we wont win squat.
That sounds great.
Not.
We shouldn't just wait for Pep to leave and nobody is saying that. Even Jose. United shouldn't wait for someone to leave to come back on top and certainly should hire a manager just to enjoy football even if it means we're in City's shadow.
What if Pep won't leave in a foreseeable future? Then what?
 
I hope I'm not the first to point out that the thread title isn't an actual Jose quote?
Have a word with yourselves.
 
Last edited:
Overrating Alex Ferguson? The man won a title with the likes of Cleverly and Anderson playing huge roles, Mourinho would cause a fall out with everyone and get himself fired if he were ever to deal with a similar situation. It's the Mourinho fanboys who are willing to fling mud on our legends to defend the self declared special one.
You're on ignore from before but I'm going to answer you anyway. I'm certainly not 'flinging mud' or whatever on SAF. I'm just saying I doubt he'd win the CL. Quit all that fanboys stuff. There is a middle ground between Jose haters and Jose fanboys you know..
 
Last edited:
I really don't buy the money excuse. Yeah they spend more than us but we spent far more than Liverpool/Spurs and we aren't 19 points clear of them. He isn't doing the worst job but he can get more out of these players.
 
So we should tell him to fe.k of if we think or the club thinks he won't win the title. And lets bring an attacking coach just to enjoy football even if we wont win squat.
That sounds great.
Not.
Well it’s looking likely that we won win the title under Mourinho. The coach himself is the one admitting such things.

Under Mourinho we would end up not winning the title while playing shit football along the way. That’s too hard a pill to swallow.

We should at least enjoy our football if we are not winning squat. That’s fair.
 
Well it’s looking likely that we won win the title under Mourinho. The coach himself is the one admitting such things.

Under Mourinho we would end up not winning the title while playing shit football along the way. That’s too hard a pill to swallow.

We should at least enjoy our football if we are not winning squat. That’s fair.
How is it looking likely? Where did he admit that? Point to it please.
 
You're on ignore but I'm going to answer you anyway. I'm certainly not 'flinging mud' or whatever on SAF. I'm just saying I doubt he'd win the CL. Quit all that fanboys stuff. There is a middle ground between Jose haters and Jose fanboys you know..
He didn't win the CL when he had some brilliant sides. The CL to me involves a lot of luck. I always think of it as a glorified cup competition. A wrong decision by a player or a referee, we had plenty of the latter can rob you.
 
I really don't buy the money excuse. Yeah they spend more than us but we spent far more than Liverpool/Spurs and we aren't 19 points clear of them. He isn't doing the worst job but he can get more out of these players.
But we are ahead of them though, the only reason we aren't 10 plus points ahead of them is because we chucked the league in after the City game.
For me, its not a 19 point gap in the same way if we stayed focused and were 12 points ahead of a half assed Liverpool side.
These dead games are just in the way.
 
Err yes ? How is that even a question ? You can have your opinion about the football he's serving as you want, it's ok, but if you believe our squad is starting to have a good quality and it's not the problem,then it's only down to Mourinho signings, no ? If you are going to list the likes of Matic, Pogba, Sanchez, Lukaku ..etc as an example of the quality we have then they are all his signings ? So yes he's very trustable with the money he gets and he's injecting more quality in the squad with each market passing. This has nothing to do with his style of play. You're mixing things up.
So u basically just repeated what I said. My worry is he spends 200m brings in quality players who have a couple of years left and by time he leaves we have never really experienced them playing great football. I've no doubt Jose can bring in big names, but I have doubt in how he makes them play.
 
I'm not expecting much next season, the only way we even get close to a title race under Mourinho next season is if City players cool off or face serious injuries to vital cogs in their team. I just pray we look at least cohesive and play decent football next season.
 
So u basically just repeated what I said. My worry is he spends 200m brings in quality players who have a couple of years left and by time he leaves we have never really experienced them playing great football. I've no doubt Jose can bring in big names, but I have doubt in how he makes them play.

He'll leave a great squad for the following manager by the way his signings are going, which what you should care about then and it denies your point. Mourinho is very trustable with money. It's not even a question.
 
He didn't win the CL when he had some brilliant sides. The CL to me involves a lot of luck. I always think of it as a glorified cup competition. A wrong decision by a player or a referee, we had plenty of the latter can rob you.
Yeah for sure. Maybe things would go his way and certainly we have a good team.
After all as someone said how long we're gonna compare every United team with SAF ones'?
I'm with you on Jose, he should do a better job but on the other hand his job is portrayed by some as disastrous one or something and still the same myths prevail which people use just to bash him endless. I mean his every word is twisted just to look bad. Not to mention that 'attacking manager' stuff. It's like United should hire some manager, any manager just as long as he's an attacking one. Who cares if we're a football powerhouse or we should be one.
 
How is it looking likely? Where did he admit that? Point to it please.
"And the reality of the numbers is between second and fifth the difference is three or four or five points, but the difference between the first and the second is a difference of 19 points and that's the reality of the numbers.

"Can we close that gap in one season with a very difficult market, absolutely difficult market? We are going to try."

It does not get clearly than this. If you are expecting him point blank to say we are unlikely to win the title next season, then you must be really naive.

If and when we do not win the title next season, he would simply say we tried like he stated earlier.

The GURANTEE of wins with him was always the main reason (or the reason at all) I wanted him as our coach. If that is gone, then there’s not much. There’s no real benefit sticking with him.
 
"And the reality of the numbers is between second and fifth the difference is three or four or five points, but the difference between the first and the second is a difference of 19 points and that's the reality of the numbers.

"Can we close that gap in one season with a very difficult market, absolutely difficult market? We are going to try."

It does not get clearly than this. If you are expecting him point blank to say we are unlikely to win the title next season, then you must be really naive.

If and when we do not win the title next season, he would simply say we tried like he stated earlier.

The GURANTEE of wins with him was always the main reason (or the reason at all) I wanted him as our coach. If that is gone, then there’s not much. There’s no real benefit sticking with him.
Words 'we will try' don't mean he's admitting he can't win the title. You do understand that don't you?
I think you're the one who is naive.
He won't certainly say he is guaranteeing the title next season cause there's no GUARANTEES in football. But he didn't admit he can't win the league with United. It's just in your head I'm afraid.
I don't get your logic,is your logic we should sack him cause of these words, after he finished 2nd in the league?
 
Improve the fecking football and most of us will be happy!

Yes, our squad quality is miles behind City right now, but so is the approach of our manager. Mourinho wouldn’t get half the shit he does on here if he adopted a more offensive approach to matches.
This. Also whilst City might be ahead of us - there’s no excuse losing or drawing to the teams who have a fraction of our budget.
 
Ha! PATHETIC man,

here, Jose, you should sell our most attacking and positive players, and just a buy a bunch of tall blokes and while you're at it, extend Fellaini's contract, if that doesn't help us catch City, I don't know what will
 
Good old Jose, always trying to sparkle a debate on the Caf.

Now it's clear what he is doing most days sitting alone in Lowry (scrolling, chuckle, scrolling...).
 
What's very interesting is that the sentiments displayed on these last couple of pages, most of them being nonsense by the way, actually match perfectly with Mourinho's (alleged) miserable approach to the game of football :wenger:
 
He's just putting pressure on the board by going publicly.

There can be all the money in the world available to him but he (Jose) has to get the transfers right. The last thing we need is another failed transfer window. I'll be raging if we blow our money on another ''super star'' like Dybala who simply won't fit us or make us any better (see Sanchez).
 
This. Also whilst City might be ahead of us - there’s no excuse losing or drawing to the teams who have a fraction of our budget.

You don't really need excuses, you can and will logically lose games against teams that have a fraction of your budget, in isolation every game can be seen as KO game and you can always have a bad day. Where we don't have excuses is when we aren't outperforming teams over an entire season(which isn't the case at the moment) or when we aren't playing more cohesively and more consistently than "poorer" teams.
 
My understanding is that Young and Shaw will both be staying. I think I read this somewhere a few days ago.
And given that Valencia is the captain, is Jose going to replace him so readily?
If this is the case, then we could be in for another frustrating season, in terms of lack of width.

If that's the case then city sounds like they are about to go back to back.
 
I'm seeing a lot of people say Pep inherited an exceptional squad while mentioning the likes of Sterling, Fernandinho and Otamendi.
The revisionism is getting out of hand.
In the summer of 2016, there are only three players the Car would have taken from them. Aguero, KDB and Silva. Silva had even been poor for two seasons.
Anyway, that's water under the bridge.
 
Yeah for sure. Maybe things would go his way and certainly we have a good team.
After all as someone said how long we're gonna compare every United team with SAF ones'?
I'm with you on Jose, he should do a better job but on the other hand his job is portrayed by some as disastrous one or something and still the same myths prevail which people use just to bash him endless. I mean his every word is twisted just to look bad. Not to mention that 'attacking manager' stuff. It's like United should hire some manager, any manager just as long as he's an attacking one. Who cares if we're a football powerhouse or we should be one.
It's the goal scored that bothered me. People keep going on about LvG, remember how bad it was under LvG. That was unbelievably bad, it doesn't mean what we have now is great. It is an improvement, yes, but it could be a lot better and if it had been the results would have been better as well.
 
SAF had plenty of precious players he had to work with and he usually always got the best out of any player he had regardless of what they were like as individuals.

Sorry but trying to use SAF as a defense for Mourinho is just pathetic. With this squad he'd be dominating the PL and probably winning another CL or two as well. It's the best squad we've had since the last time he won it.

it is comical how so many posters go back to our "weak" squad or whatever, like we're the only team in the modern game with players obsessed with money and glamour. it's a load of tosh. A great manager should be able to handle those players regardless of what they're like, and nobody could do that like SAF.

Fully agree, the manager is the one that makes the team mediocre or great. I too can't believe how people can slate SAF to try and prove a point for Mourinho's difficult challenge and less than expected achievements. Firstly SAF would never have spent 75 mil on Lukaku, he too thought Utd needed a striker in his last season and went out and bought RvP. He would not be begging any player to stay like Jose is doing with Fellaini and how often did he have to do with the team he had while other teams were strengthening and the Glazers were draining the funds off the club. How often did he have to tell the fans and press there was nothing of value in the market at the end of transfer window (not quite sure he believed that either). Yet the man was able to get the players performing above their level and with one good buy RvP, won the league. I think it is a low blow to use SAF and the team he left behind to justify Mourinho's short comings, it isn't as if Jose was starved of financial backing in the transfer market, except Jose has not gone about his spending wisely and has yet to improve one player's performance since arriving, SAF improved all players he had at his disposal. He protected his players when things weren't going well, Jose throws his players under the bus at every opportunity to clear himself of any blame.
 
I'm seeing a lot of people say Pep inherited an exceptional squad while mentioning the likes of Sterling, Fernandinho and Otamendi.
The revisionism is getting out of hand.
In the summer of 2016, there are only three players the Car would have taken from them. Aguero, KDB and Silva. Silva had even been poor for two seasons.
Anyway, that's water under the bridge.

People were arguing that Memphis was better than Sterling.
 
He'll leave a great squad for the following manager by the way his signings are going, which what you should care about then and it denies your point. Mourinho is very trustable with money. It's not even a question.
Let's assume Jose stays for 2 more years which is probably likely. Sanchez will be 32, griezman will be 30, bale 30s kroos 30s (if we buy them). Pogba 27 lukaku 27 .... My point is he can buy all the great players but by time the next manager comes he will need to reinvest and we woulld not have got to see the best out of these guys because of his style of play. We are miles behind city and there style of play. Quality will always be on par but how much do we continue to throw on the table if we wont play better football. Thats all i want to see, better football.