Mainoldo
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2004
- Messages
- 22,965
So they got an official bid from an unknown email address??
Woodward and Judge got a new club?
Woodward and Judge got a new club?
So he is bidding against himself?Their bid for Rice was open & the pull of Guardiola/City will tempt a player like Caicedo, who is already edgy, to revolt. Why would they go anonymous and weaken their position? This sounds like something Boehly would do.
So he is bidding against himself?
Third time lucky for United then.Adios then, Moises. Arsenal have had a go. Chelsea have had a go. I guess it’ll be United’s turn next summer.
Boehly will pay up. It's just this summer's Cucurella saga.
Boehly will pay up. It's just this summer's Cucurella saga.
Chelsea in the mud. Nothings changed.
Hopefully chelsea now move on and get another midfielder before season starts.
It was actually our fans telling us we funded their transfer. That was a bit nonsensical anyway. But the bigger concern for Chelsea is they are seriously short of depth with a week of the start of the season remaining.There fans told us we funded this transfer.
There fans told us we funded this transfer.
Journos made it all up. Or somebody muddied the course.Chelsea in the mud. Nothings changed.
That was your own fans.
So many posters to quote.There fans told us we funded this transfer.
Brighton not selling to Chelsea for a price Chelsea want = the end of Brighton. Brighton don't solely exist to "help" players move to bigger clubs. Regardless, I'm sure they'll be fine.See, if Brighton admit they do t think ANY club would match their valuation this Summer, then by their own reasoning they made the valuation outside of reason, therefore “unreasonable”, and therefore publicly admitting a lie to their player.
They already intrinsically broke their promise when they tried to hold the deal hostage pending another player (Colwill).
I can’t imagine any of this will go over well with Caicedo, or any other player they try to convince they’re “helping” in the future.
See, if Brighton admit they do t think ANY club would match their valuation this Summer, then by their own reasoning they made the valuation outside of reason, therefore “unreasonable”, and therefore publicly admitting a lie to their player.
They already intrinsically broke their promise when they tried to hold the deal hostage pending another player (Colwill).
I can’t imagine any of this will go over well with Caicedo, or any other player they try to convince they’re “helping” in the future.
Why would Chelsea sign Sanchez for £25m then?(way above current valuation?) I call bs especially when their are other 2nd choice keeper that Chelsea would have gotten.
That price is actually pretty much spot on for his valuation, 25 years old Spanish International but qualifies as Home Grown due to coming through an English Academy. He has been a regular PL starter for 3 seasons and by most metrics is far superior to Kepa, he is not being bought as 2nd choice regardless of what might get said over the next few days.
Chelsea paid 100m for a midfielder after six month in the Portuguese league and yet are refusing to do the same for another highly rated midfielder whose done it in the EPL. I think what Brighton are asking is fair considering the current market.See, if Brighton admit they do t think ANY club would match their valuation this Summer, then by their own reasoning they made the valuation outside of reason, therefore “unreasonable”, and therefore publicly admitting a lie to their player.
They already intrinsically broke their promise when they tried to hold the deal hostage pending another player (Colwill).
I can’t imagine any of this will go over well with Caicedo, or any other player they try to convince they’re “helping” in the future.
Go over to North Stand Chat. They’re calling him their 3rd choice keeper and it’s about £10-12M more than most of their fans expected for Sanchez. Also show me the metrics that shows ‘far superior’ than Kepa, because what I’ve seen actually show he’s worse than him.