Middle East Politics

Holdddd up, I genuinely had no idea that the last 3/4 US Presidents promised the same thing?!!!

 
Yep, Clinton first OK'd it but everyone including himself has been delaying signing the final piece of paper.
Hmm ok got it.
Thought this was a brand new Trump thing.

Ok that changes my perception slightly. Still think it’s a bit irresponsible unless a bigger play going on.
 
The bigger play from Trump's perspective is to appeal to Sheldon Adelson so he can bankroll his 2020 campaign.
 
Hmm ok got it.
Thought this was a brand new Trump thing.

Ok that changes my perception slightly. Still think it’s a bit irresponsible unless a bigger play going on.
Here's a brief historic breakdown, written shortly before Trump's announcement. I guess in practice Jerusalem's status was generally seen as something that has to be settled in a peace deal.
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.769498
 
The Palestinian Authority should dissolve itself, it was set up as part of the peace process, but since that's now dead, it has no reason for being. I've said this for years, this is an anti-apartheid struggle
 
Perhaps its time for a more neutral mediator of peace talks?

The US isn't doing anyone any favours with their grossly biased approach, not even Israel. Doesn't help that the POTUS is catering towards his base who are essentially the white Hamas.
 
Morris in Revisited: "In examining the causes of the Arab exodus from Palestine over 1947–1949, accurate quantification is impossible. I have tried to show that the exodus occurred in stages and that causation was multi-layered...What happened in Palestine/Israel over 1947–1949 was so complex and varied, the situation radically changing from date to date and place to place, that a single-cause explanation of the exodus from most sites is untenable...At most, one can say that certain causes were important in certain areas at certain times, with a general shift in the spring of 1948 from precedence of cumulative internal Arab factors – lack of leadership, economic problems, breakdown of law and order – to a primacy of external, compulsive causes: Haganah/IDF attacks and expulsions, fear of Jewish attacks and atrocities, lack of help from the Arab world and the AHC and a feeling of impotence and abandonment, and orders from Arab officials and commanders to leave. In general, throughout the war, the final and decisive precipitant to flight in most places was Haganah, IZL, LHI or IDF attack or the inhabitants’ fear of imminent attack."
Thanks 2cents. This is from the conclusion in Revisited, right? Were Morris' conclusions different at all in the original? Morris' work has been widely praised as doing more to uncover what happened in 1948 than anybody else, but that the zionist in him comes out in his conclusions. I think this is an interesting quote from fellow new historian Avi Shlaim:

"His 1988 book, The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947-1949, drove a coach and horses through the claim that the Palestinians left Palestine of their own accord or on orders from their leaders. With a great wealth of recently declassified material, he analysed the role that Israel played in precipitating the Palestinian exodus. … The hallmark of his approach was to stick as closely as possible to the documentary evidence, to record rather than to evaluate. While his findings were original and arresting, he upheld the highest standards of historical scholarship, and he wrote with almost clinical detachment. ... The message, pithily summed up in a long interview that Benny gave to Yediot Aharonot about his highly publicised conversion, is that "the Arabs are responsible". Where no evidence is available to sustain the argument of Arab intransigence, Benny makes it up by drawing on his fertile imagination. … His post-conversion interpretation of history is old history with a vengeance. It is indistinguishable from the propaganda of the victors.”

According to Morris, up until April there were very few cases of coerced expulsion or destruction of villages - "in the war’s first four months, between the end of November 1947 and the end of March 1948, there were no preparations for mass expulsion and there were almost no cases of expulsion or the leveling of villages". He then argues that "as a result of Arab belligerence and the Yishuv’s sense of siege, fragility and isolation", a harsher policy of transfer came into play from April onwards.
I wonder, does Morris consider the fact that across the entire zionist leadership (including Ben Gurion), that the idea of "transfer" had been discussed for well over a decade and that by the mid-1940s zionist leaders were united in considering "transfer" to be an essential ingredient if there was to be any kind of Jewish state in Palestine?
 
Last edited:
Perhaps its time for a more neutral mediator of peace talks?

The US isn't doing anyone any favours with their grossly biased approach, not even Israel. Doesn't help that the POTUS is catering towards his base who are essentially the white Hamas.

WTF does more neutral mean??. You either are or you're not.
Anyway, it's an impossible ask. The conflict is the fault line between Western democracy and Jihad, between brave recognition of this fact and those who cower to the fear or Islamic terror attacks (or an oil embargo back in the day).

There is no in-between, and those who believe there is have only served (innocently of otherwise), to keep the flames going.
 
Last edited:
The Palestinian Authority should dissolve itself, it was set up as part of the peace process, but since that's now dead, it has no reason for being. I've said this for years, this is an anti-apartheid struggle

I find it hilarious that the most intolerant culture ever has the chutzpah to lecture others on tolerance.

CsxFR9sWgAAI38u.jpg
 
Last edited:
This is from the conclusion in Revisited, right? Were Morris' conclusions different at all in the original?

I don't think his conclusions were ultimately different (he claims they weren't), but I think there is slightly more emphasis on what he calls Arab intransigence in Revisited, which according to him reflects the new archival material he found in the 90s but can definitely be speculated to be a result of his own political journey which culminated in his disillusionment with Oslo after 2000. Either way, Morris leaves nothing out which might lead a reader to come to a different conclusion (unlike say Pappe or, on the other side, Karsh), which IMO is the sign of a truly great historian.

I wonder, does Morris consider the fact that across the entire zionist leadership (including Ben Gurion), that the idea of "transfer" had been discussed for well over a decade and that by the mid-1940s zionist leaders were united in considering "transfer" to be an essential ingredient if there was to be any kind of Jewish state in Palestine?

Absolutely, he devotes a lot of time to this. He claims the idea goes back at least to the 1920s, and was consolidated once it became clear that the Jews could/would not become a majority in Palestine through migration alone.
 
I find it hilarious that the most intolerant culture ever has the chutzpah to lecture others on tolerance.

The most intolerant culture ever? Do you even read what you're writing before you hit post?
 
I find it hilarious that the most intolerant culture ever has the chutzpah to lecture others on tolerance.

CsxFR9sWgAAI38u.jpg

I can find Jewish people who say the opposite.

Israel is an apartheid state, since this week has been spun as an exercise in recognising facts it's time to recognise it for what it is
 
WTF does more neutral mean??. You either are or you're not.
Anyway, it's an impossible ask. The conflict is the fault line between Western democracy and Jihad, between brave recognition of this fact and those who cower to the fear or Islamic terror attacks (or an oil embargo back in the day).

There is no in-between, and those who believe there is have only served (innocently of otherwise), to keep the flames going.

Yeah because Palestinian Christians are all flag-waving jihadist zealots. Do you even read the crap you post these days?
 
Really? - how many Arab Jews currently hold high positions in Arab countries?

Show us.

I was talking about Jewish people who will support my point that Israel is a racist state

Your man up there is a useful idiot, he gets to parade around and paid nicely for the privilege, you get your propaganda tool
 
@Fearless

What's your view on the Jewish community in Iran and those of them who say they feel safe there and have no intention of going to Israel?

Are they traitors for not migrating to their Holy Land?

Despite religious minorities being allowed to live in Iran, a majority of the Jewish population of Iran has left the country (to Israel or the US) for good reason. A Muslim will also be punished by death for converting to Judaism. Horrible example.

Israel is forcing Palestinians out of Palestine and is committing apartheid-like crimes but is still better at human rights than its neighbours, which says a lot about the neighbours.
 
Palestinians got sold out by the F-ing Saudis.

They've always had it right. Fight - Fight for what you believe to be yours. And if you die fighting for it...so be it. Because, no one is going to stand up for them and the Israelis, while acting like victims, will continue to destroy their will to survive.

Israel will win because arabs leaders are uneducated pieces of shit, who less than 70 years ago were busy playing cops and robbers in the desert lol. Oh and did I mention, they are cowards.

Cowards to a man :lol:
 
Palestinians got sold out by the F-ing Saudis.

They've always had it right. Fight - Fight for what you believe to be yours. And if you die fighting for it...so be it. Because, no one is going to stand up for them and the Israelis, while acting like victims, will continue to destroy their will to survive.

Israel will win because arabs leaders are uneducated pieces of shit, who less than 70 years ago were busy playing cops and robbers in the desert lol. Oh and did I mention, they are cowards.

Cowards to a man :lol:
Bang on.

We can lament Israel and Trump all we want but all of this is largely down to the spineless Arab leaders. I don't even blame Israel tbh.
 
I was talking about Jewish people who will support my point that Israel is a racist state

Your man up there is a useful idiot, he gets to parade around and paid nicely for the privilege, you get your propaganda tool

Then here's another one for you. That's two Arabs in prominent Israeli Government positions compared to your absolute zero Jews in Arab ones.

Joubran+apartheid.jpg
 
Then here's another one for you. That's two Arabs in prominent Israeli Government positions compared to your absolute zero Jews in Arab ones.

Joubran+apartheid.jpg

André Azoulay is a Moroccan Jew who is a long-time senior adviser to King Muhammad VI and his father.
 
DQybgooVAAAz90N


From this:

Key Middle East Publics See Russia, Turkey and U.S. All Playing Larger Roles in Region

(Edit): Some other results:


PG_2017.12.11_Middle-East_00.png

PG_2017.12.11_Middle-East_02.png

PG_2017.12.11_Middle-East_03.png

PG_2017.12.11_Middle-East_04.png

PG_2017.12.11_Middle-East_05.png

PG_2017.12.11_Middle-East_06.png

PG_2017.12.11_Middle-East_07.png

PG_2017.12.11_Middle-East_08.png

PG_2017.12.11_Middle-East_09.png

PG_2017.12.11_Middle-East_10.png

PG_2017.12.11_Middle-East_11.png

PG_2017.12.11_Middle-East_12.png

 
Last edited:
Then here's another one for you. That's two Arabs in prominent Israeli Government positions compared to your absolute zero Jews in Arab ones.

Joubran+apartheid.jpg

Yes apartheid. A token gesture here or their doesn't mean much because they will never be allowed in enough numbers to hold power over Jewish Israelis
 
Coincidentally (or not), today is the 100th year anniversary of General Allenby's famous entrance into Jerusalem:

 
The Palestinian Authority should dissolve itself, it was set up as part of the peace process, but since that's now dead, it has no reason for being. [...]

On the contrary the Palestinian Authority does have a reason for being. The PA have powers under Oslo I and Oslo II.

For example, who will be responsible for overseeing the powers transferred to the PA under Oslo I, in the areas of education; health; social protection; direct taxation, and; tourism?
 
On the contrary the Palestinian Authority does have a reason for being. The PA have powers under Oslo I and Oslo II.

For example, who will be responsible for overseeing the powers transferred to the PA under Oslo I, in the areas of education; health; social protection; direct taxation, and; tourism?

Israel
 
Its Israels own fault, the Israelis have no interest in negotiating a truly independent Palestine, therefore this must turn into a struggle for equal rights

A two state solution would only prolong the conflict.