- Joined
- Jun 22, 2006
- Messages
- 1,632
Sarni said:I'm not saying Carrick isn't worth his price, I just pointed out why fee is important when it comes to judge player.
Exactomundo
Sarni said:I'm not saying Carrick isn't worth his price, I just pointed out why fee is important when it comes to judge player.
RedRichio said:I think it is ridiculous to even begin to judge Carrick yet. I think a player should always be given at least six months before you should start criticising.
steerterry50 said:the divided posts on this thread suggest it is to early to say whether he will be a success, for 18 million it should be a given but fergies recent transfer history is poor.
Sarni said:Is it really?
Out of transfers we've made since Summer 2003, I can't see any bad buys. Saha, Heinze, Smith, Rooney, Park, Foster, van der Sar, Vidic have all proven themselves good players, jury's still out on Evra but he's improved a lot, Kuszczak can't fail either in my humble opinion.
Fergie hasn't brought players he should've brought, but the ones he has signed recently are all good players. There's a difference between transfer history, abilities of players signed and not filling voids in certain areas of the pitch.
Sarni said:Is it really?
Out of transfers we've made since Summer 2003, I can't see any bad buys. Saha, Heinze, Smith, Rooney, Park, Foster, van der Sar, Vidic have all proven themselves good players, jury's still out on Evra but he's improved a lot, Kuszczak can't fail either in my humble opinion.
Fergie hasn't brought players he should've brought, but the ones he has signed recently are all good players. There's a difference between transfer history, abilities of players signed and not filling voids in certain areas of the pitch.
redjoe said:I think the original poster was referring to some of our more less successful purchases in recent seasons such as Forlan, Miller, Djemba x2,Veron,Bellion etc.
Like any top manager, you have to take the rough with the smooth.
Sarni said:He's changed policy since infamous 2003 flop, what's the point of judging players he had brought before 2004 then?
They are past. None of them are with us anymore. Presence is what happened recently, e.g. in the last three years.
DevilsOwn said:for the 14 mil we paid for him.. we wont get two players as good as him.. forget three..
he is proven in the prem.. look at how lost spurs are this season without him controlling the midfield..
dont think even keano became the keano we love within 5 matches??
Very good point i remember Keano playing at right back when he first came and was pretty average...In fact some fans in the Stretford end were slating him early on
steerterry50 said:the divided posts on this thread suggest it is to early to say whether he will be a success, for 18 million it should be a given but fergies recent transfer history is poor.
steerterry50 said:the divided posts on this thread suggest it is to early to say whether he will be a success, for 18 million it should be a given but fergies recent transfer history is poor.
DevilsOwn said:beofre slagging SAF for his transfer shortcomings lets accept that united today cant buy anyone they wanted.. money is all not there.. our reputation in europe is not all that good..
in such a situation.. SAF has beeen able to buy some good players.. adn esp in the last few years (as shown by Sarni above).. he has only bought good players who have fit our system..
we are not wasteful in the market.. and new players who are coming are adding to us..
given this.. i really am looking forward to carrick doing well... he was pretty good against Benfica today
it's not rocket science, yet a lot of people cant understand thatlorcanjc said:Carrick will be a very good signing for us he justs needs time to settle it.
lorcanjc said:Carrick will be a very good signing for us he justs needs time to settle it.
amolbhatia100 said:TBH im not sure Alan Smith and Park have proven to be good signings yet. Vidic and Evra will probably will.
Wonder Pigeon said:
Wolverine said:In attack, we'll have hopefully Rooney, Saha, Ronaldo, Carrick, Scholesy and Giggs in a 4-4-2 and with a solid and confidence defense behind them i think the issue of us not having "steel" in the middle of the park we can still beat teams like we did in the first 5 games.
vijay said:2006/2007
Ins
Carrick 18.6M
Spent: £18.6M
Outs
Ebanks
Blake
Fortune
Ruud(undisc)
Steele
McShane
Liam Miller
Saved: Only £200000 for Ebanks as the rest were released for free
Van Nistelrooy's fee stil remains undisclosed.
Loaned In
Pole
2005/2006
Ins
VDS(undisc)
Park £4M
Foster £1M
Vidic £7M
Evra £5.5M
Total spent £ 17.5M
Outs
Keano – free
P.Neville – £3.5M
Kleberson- £2.5M
Spector £0.5M
Saved £6.5M
Bellion released for free after buying him for £3M
ERICSAGOD said:Surely you mean 4, we lost to Arsenal in the 5th game, and drew with the mighty Reading in the 6th game!
Billy Bollocks said:He's a decent enough, tidy player, just a bit bland and uninspirational. He's certainly not top drawer. For 18 million I want the full package.
cesc's_mullet said:Once someone comes in to take more of the defensive duties he'll be released further up the field where his passing can be more dangerous. Someone with his passing ability should have the play channeled through him.
karan316 said:When you talk about what kind of player he needs next to him, I think you only need to look at who Spurs paired him with last season when he excelled, and that was Edgar Davids
LOL, that's how to generate extra cash. Get people to go 'double barrelled', then sell them as two different players..vijay said:2006/2007
Ins
Carrick 18.6M
Spent: £18.6M
Outs
Ebanks
Blake
karan316 said:No Carrick and Davids were playing center mid most games with Lennon on the right. Jenas was usually in the team too but he wasnt really doing anything most of the time.
amolbhatia100 said:I do think he will need to work on his work going forward. At a club like United where the emphasis is to attack, he does need to contribute.
Mozza said:Wrong, Jenas played in central midfield with Carrick, Davids or Mido or anyone but Andy Ried played on the left wing, becuase he's fat and shite.