Isn't there some Portuguese fella that is quite similar, Neves or something like that? Never watched him.
No idea. I only watch United and sometimes a few Bundesliga games.
Isn't there some Portuguese fella that is quite similar, Neves or something like that? Never watched him.
Agree with this. It's a dilemma, but one can keep Mata on the bench and put him on if we are chasing a goal. Carrick needs someone with energy next to him though. I still maintain that his recovery pace (over distance) isn't bad, obviously not Mensah-like, but he really struggles on those first five yards which leads him too far behind. But he has always been like this.
This game showed me that we need a younger Carrick type player and then play him with Herrera and Pogba in a three.
No you said he was fast, quite literally.I think I used the word "decent" to describe his top speed and said he had awful acceleration, but on a long stretch he isn't slow. You claim he slows us down when he in fact initiates every single fast attack we have with his incisive pass through the middle our to the wings, but yeah.
No idea. I only watch United and sometimes a few Bundesliga games.
No you said he was fast, quite literally.
Interesting, I thought I was the only one in here who don't watch 50 matches per week. Good for us!
Yeah, but as you said it's not unlike Scholes towards the end with the difference being that Carrick defends considerably better although doesn't have the same technique Scholes did. As long as we've got the right balance around him, i.e. Herrera and Pogba then we can protect Carrick. I think we could get Bailly to step up more as well at times and let Carrick drop deeper when needed which can give him a bit more time in games where teams look to hound him.
I watch Youtube compilations as well of players linked with us if that counts?
No idea. I only watch United and sometimes a few Bundesliga games.
Again, agree with this. We need to use him sparingly though. In the right set-up, with the defense holding a high line, Carrick is still a great player, but when there is space in between him and the defense, he struggles against hard pressing teams. With our new defense, we have so much speed that we don't need to worry about speedy attackers getting in behind. Carrick behind Herrera and Pogba is a great option, but I don't like leaving Mata out, but he is so much better through the middle than out wide... dilemmas.
Thank you for proving my point. Good top speed, awful acceleration.http://www.manutd.com/en/News-And-F...ster-united-fastest-player-in-2015-16.aspx?AL
Carrick clocked our highest top speed against Bournemouth last season. Can't be that horrible in long sprints.
Valencia, Martial and Rashford all played that game.
You're right of course, if you make up your own definitions. CARRICK IS NOT FAST. There's no arguing that. Even his biggest fans wouldn't claim he is fast.Jeez - I said he was fast in terms of outright top speed. Quite literally, you said I argued he was quick, which I never did. Maybe you should read my entire argument, just as you should watch Carrick's entire match instead of that one time he dallied a bit on the ball to get a bigger picture on things? By the way, Paris is more than the Eiffel Tower.
Jeez - I said he was fast in terms of outright top speed. Quite literally, you said I argued he was quick, which I never did. Maybe you should read my entire argument, just as you should watch Carrick's entire match instead of that one time he dallied a bit on the ball to get a bigger picture on things? By the way, Paris is more than the Eiffel Tower.
This game showed me that we need a younger Carrick type player and then play him with Herrera and Pogba in a three.
Fellaini is not really that type of player - distribution and control of the game from deep is not good enough - a younger Pirlo would be idea but I'd take a younger CarrickFellaini?
Fellaini is not really that type of player - distribution and control of the game from deep is not good enough - a younger Pirlo would be idea but I'd take a younger Carrick
How is that cloning process going? I'd like a Scholes and a Giggs to go too, please. What about Brazilian no9, is he in stock?
There are many good midfielders around. I'm not sure we need the same type of midfielder. I'd gladly take Verratti, though that would mean the most expensive central midfield ever.
He's right though. Fellaini is no Carrick
Maybe Blind can do the trick
You're right of course, if you make up your own definitions. CARRICK IS NOT FAST. There's no arguing that. Even his biggest fans wouldn't claim he is fast.
What Carrick shows us is that no matter how much of a pure DM player we are after we need to get someone with abillity on the ball. Abillity on the ball by all in the midfield is essential in modern football, this is why someone like Schneiderlin can't cut it as holding midfield \ DM for a top club.
There needs to be some ball abillity in there, perhaps except if the player in question is such a mobile, positional wise and all conquering DM that he literally free the other guy \ other two in the midfield two\three from nearly all defensive duties.
ThisHe's right though. Fellaini is no Carrick
Maybe Blind can do the trick
http://www.manutd.com/en/News-And-F...ster-united-fastest-player-in-2015-16.aspx?AL
Carrick clocked our highest top speed against Bournemouth last season. Can't be that horrible in long sprints.
Valencia, Martial and Rashford all played that game.
Thank you for proving my point. Good top speed, awful acceleration.
Could Dahoud play a Carrick role or is he too attacking?