Pablo76
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2006
- Messages
- 3,746
Annoyingly likeable bloke, compare him to Jermaine Jenas for example and you wonder why some ‘pundits’ are even employed.
He’s the class clown. His compadre Nedum Onuaha is a seriously good pundit.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/av/59527230
Good little insight into how much some youngsters get paid too soon. Went from 5k a week to 50k ( ) and obviously went a bit mental with it.
Micah Richards on 5k a week:
Micah Richards on 50k a week:
Onuaha is really great, I think I actually created a thread on him and it has about 3 answers I don't really understand why people love Micah so much, he's really shit at his job and for me is just a reflection of how current days form over substance is preferred. I don't actually mind him per se, I just really don't get it and find it surprising how such mediocrity is followed up with "he's amazing", "he's a breath of fresh air", "it's such a change"... A bit of an emperor's new clothes situation for me.He’s the class clown. His compadre Nedum Onuaha is a seriously good pundit.
He's funny and he doesn't have the classic british pundit dumb feck attitude, that's why people like him.Onuaha is really great, I think I actually created a thread on him and it has about 3 answers I don't really understand why people love Micah so much, he's really shit at his job and for me is just a reflection of how current days form over substance is preferred. I don't actually mind him per se, I just really don't get it and find it surprising how such mediocrity is followed up with "he's amazing", "he's a breath of fresh air", "it's such a change"... A bit of an emperor's new clothes situation for me.
Onuaha is really great, I think I actually created a thread on him and it has about 3 answers I don't really understand why people love Micah so much, he's really shit at his job and for me is just a reflection of how current days form over substance is preferred. I don't actually mind him per se, I just really don't get it and find it surprising how such mediocrity is followed up with "he's amazing", "he's a breath of fresh air", "it's such a change"... A bit of an emperor's new clothes situation for me.
I get that, and I can get on board with people liking him cos he laughs loud... But he's a really terrible pundit. He offers nothing with regards to analysis, and while people say he's different to the other "dour, old school, British pundits", this is where it's style over substance - he's as shallow as most of them when it comes to offering any insight. I recently heard him analyse the defensive side of a team's performance, and his take on it was "just lump it forward, stop trying this silly passing round the back". Had Shearer offered that type of analysis, people would find it shit - cos it's Richards, and because it's followed by roaring laughter, it's fun and fresh.I don't think people like him for his punditry and I don't think people care as much about football analysis at half time as they used to. People like him because he's cancelling out the dour state of the majority of pundits he works with.
I get that, and I can get on board with people liking him cos he laughs loud... But he's a really terrible pundit. He offers nothing with regards to analysis, and while people say he's different to the other "dour, old school, British pundits", this is where it's style over substance - he's as shallow as most of them when it comes to offering any insight. I recently heard him analyse the defensive side of a team's performance, and his take on it was "just lump it forward, stop trying this silly passing round the back". Had Shearer offered that type of analysis, people would find it shit - cos it's Richards, and because it's followed by roaring laughter, it's fun and fresh.
I don't fundamentally care, I'm not exposed to him that much, I just am surprised at how positive people are about his obvious mediocrity at what he does.
Nedum was hardly known as a pundit until recently but is now popping up for many broadcasters on many topics, not just in relation to City.I generally agree with what you say here but I think you have to think of the context of the environment he works in. He mainly works on MOTD and Sky where they are creating content for the casual football fan/general viewer aswell as the die hard followers of football. They want a character that can bring in and make things more accessible to all rather than just football fans that want top analysts. People who are more tuned into analysis know to go to the other outlets on radio etc. that Onuoha and his ilk are on.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/av/59527230
Good little insight into how much some youngsters get paid too soon. Went from 5k a week to 50k ( ) and obviously went a bit mental with it.
Mine was when I pulled a guy's shirt to stop him making a run off me, and he turned around to me and said "Do that again and i'll break you and your family's legs" ... I just pictured him two footing my nan and couldn't stop laughing.
Mine was when I pulled a guy's shirt to stop him making a run off me, and he turned around to me and said "Do that again and i'll break you and your family's legs" ... I just pictured him two footing my nan and couldn't stop laughing.
Even by the very low bar pundits are judged, he's tragic at analysis. I'm amazed that more isn't made of it, he's basically incompetent at the core aspects of his job but is appreciated cos he has chemistry with the others and has "an infectious laugh" (I find his laugh incredibly annoying). It's weird that I dislike him so much, I've really tried to listen to him over and over, and tried to "get it", but I just don't. As I've said before, just feels like it's this trend of glorifying mediocrity.Top guy. Hate that he’s the Man City ambassador.
His punditry is entertaining which is fine. Considering insight isn’t a strong suit for pundits he isn’t breaking the mould there
Don’t be, he talks pure shite and it’s painful watching him trying to articulate himself.Even by the very low bar pundits are judged, he's tragic at analysis. I'm amazed that more isn't made of it, he's basically incompetent at the core aspects of his job but is appreciated cos he has chemistry with the others and has "an infectious laugh" (I find his laugh incredibly annoying). It's weird that I dislike him so much, I've really tried to listen to him over and over, and tried to "get it", but I just don't. As I've said before, just feels like it's this trend of glorifying mediocrity.
Of former City "legends", Nedum Onuoha is so much better. He doesn't laugh every 15 seconds or as soon as he's meant to contribute in a meaningful way, but he's super articulate and interesting. I feel he deserves more exposure (or maybe he has big exposure, and I don't realise it?)
Micah Richards is on MOTD quite regularly?MOTD need to sort it out, it’s embarrassing how stale their show is and also quite annoying since it’s tax payers money. Why can’t they get great pundits like Micah and Keane?
Can’t stand listening to Shearers monotonous analysis, Jenas towing the line and Lineker with his scripted ‘jokes’.
You've not listened to Anton Ferdinand then?Don’t be, he talks pure shite and it’s painful watching him trying to articulate himself.