RedRonaldo
Wishes to be oppressed.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2003
- Messages
- 18,996
1. Regarding La Liga titles, total trophies count already covers that up, and in fact I did already ranked Messi higher on that. What you did is just a more detail breakdown under “trophies” section, but you are adding nothing more to the arguments, because I did already rate Messi higher, putting forward more detailed breakdown as proof doesn’t change the outcome of the fact I rate Messi higher on that, get it?Of course, it is not meaningful for you))
1. Thinks that listing La Liga (then the best league in the world) awards likes best player award, top goal scorer awards, or league titles in La Liga for comparison is meaningless although says/implies in other threads if Ronaldo wins a league title with United this season, or becomes a best player in PL (now the best league in the world), or wins goal scoring awards, that would give a big edge to Ronaldo against Messi)) Oh so, all of a sudden league titles, goal scoring/best player awards in a league became meaningful again for comparison purposes in your parallel universe?? whatever fits your BS narrative.. the level of hypocrisy..
2. Conveniently ignores the goal ratios like other Ronaldo fans (they seem to have a particular goal ratio phobia), directly compares total goal numbers though Messi played almost 150 less games)) Do you know why ratios matter or are you mathematically challenged? Do you know what playing 150 less games mean when making a goals comparison? What's crazy is Messi has better goal ratios than Ronaldo, more golden boot awards, more Pichicis when both were playing in La Liga, the only area where he is supposed to beat Messi))
3.Gives international edge to Ronaldo when Ronaldo has “0” best player award in an international tournaments vs Messi’s 3 including a WC.. Completely ignores the fact that when Messi was playing the WC final in 2014, Ronaldo's Portugal failed to even go beyond the group stage being left behind mighty USA)
4. Then creates a new category in his little alternative universe called “Legacy” and calls it a tie, You cant make this shit up)) What is this “Legacy”? Is this a new alternative to that already destroyed “but, but, mentality” argument?
5. tries to desperately cover the fact that Ronaldo is nowhere near many greats of the game let alone Messi in terms of creativity, playmaking and adds multiple categories that has nothing to do with playmaking, creativity such as heading)) etc. as if these are the main qualities making wizards like Maradona, Cruyff, Zidane, Xavi, Ronaldinho etc. who they are and why they are considered among the best ever... Brings out things as tricks??, movement, determination, mentality (oh, I see you put that BS again) as if his boy has any superiority in these categories..
I will simplify it for you, two sets of attacking players as below:
Set 1: Cruyff, Maradona, Zidane, Ronaldinho, Xavi etc.
Set 2: Ronaldo9, Lewandowski, Muller, Romario etc.
Messi can easily make it to both groups as a top player whereas your boy is not welcome at Group 1, got it?
2. This has been done countless number of times. Basically no one compares or glorify goal ratio as much as you do, you don’t win a trophy with best ratio in any competitions, but you do win a trophy for best goal tally in any competitions. Moreover, Ronaldo was a winger in midfield playing 442 during his formative years, of course this will average down his career ratio. In fact his goal ratio is better than Messi if we only compare their La Liga ratio, or international football. But if you insist to include 200 games of Ronaldo playing as midfielder winger in 442, I can’t really help if you are that desperate.
3. The edge is given because winning Euro for Portugal > winning Copa for Argentina, and 111 international goals > 74 international goals. People generally values these 2 category far more. You may value best player of tournament awards more though, but no one cares about that as much as you do. I mean, could you tell if anyone remembers or cares whoever won player of tournament in Copa 91 or WC 06? But everyone knows Ronaldo is now all time top scorer in international football. There’s is only one player taking all time record, but over a hundred of players taking best tournament player awards throughout history.
4. Legacy is what GOAT is about. Pele winning 3 WC and scoring 1000 goals is legacy, Maradona single-handedly won 86 WC, with goal of century is legacy, Cruyff revolutionize football with total football is legacy, Di Stefano dominate European club football with 5 CL is legacy etc And of course, Ronaldo won 5 CL, breaking all time goal record and all time international goal record is also legacy. I think Messi legacy is winning 6 Ballon D’or, and scoring 81 goals in a season. But I just rate Ronaldo one higher. You are welcomed to disagree.
5.Creativity, dribbling or playmaking etc are already well covered under “footballing” category. You can go on add more attributes you like, but don’t forget heading, athleticism, movements, determinations, long shots etc are also part of footballing. They are all under the same category - footballing. And yes I did already rate Messi higher in footballing, what else you want from that? To disagree?
Last edited: