We've obviously not going to agree on any of this. In order to make Messi look good, you'll insist on dribbling being the most important aspect of football. I disagree.
While we all enjoy European league’s summer break, watching some Copa América or Women’s World Cup, let us talk about the everyman’s strategy in football.
If you cannot break through an opposing defence why not just play the ball down the flank and cross it into the middle? It seems like an easy strategy at first glance. However, after years of statistically analysing football, it should be common sense that knocking the ball into the box is not the most effective way of using ball possession in the opposing half. But here is the deal: It only needs to work once or twice in a match for it to be deemed profitable, while being an easily realisable tactic. Just throw all the advantages of effectively exploiting ball possession and attacking opportunities out of the window.
Particularly in England, one could have the feeling cross passes are something worth striving for. Crossing is seen as a counter to the opposition parking the bus – a cornerstone of English football thinking. Note: High and intense pressing is not common in Premier League or in Italy’s Serie A. Players and spectators often describe the English way of football as very intense and fatiguing. A usual Premier League clash goes back and forth. Of course, continual attacking runs down the flanks, where the opposing is not defending as strongly as in the centre of the pitch, accelerate the game.
However, we sometimes watch matches like when Manchester United drew with Fulham on February 9, 2014, crossing the ball 82 times. The input was high, the outcome extremely little. And remember, every inaccurate cross means the team loses the ball, even if it hurtles through the six yard box, while all target players standing five yards deeper.
Never mind Ronaldo v Messi, just look at Real Madrid v Barcelona.Of course clubs care about domestic cups, maybe not the league cup as much but spanish clubs do care about the Del Rey and english the FA Cup. Why do they play their best or almost best teams if they dont care?
You are taking out cup games to fit your argument.
Goals and assists matter when we are discussing who is the better player. Why is that not relevant.
Having to disclude facts and stats to back your argument shows that you are struggling with proving Ron to be as good as Messi.
Funny, Messi doesn´t look good, does he??We've obviously not going to agree on any of this. In order to make Messi look good, you'll insist on dribbling being the most important aspect of football. I disagree.
I happen to rate scoring as the most important factor in football.Its the other way round. I think Messi looks good because he is so good at dribbling and passing. And that's the case with Pele, Maradona, Cruyff, Laudrup, Ronaldinho, Ronaldo, Zidane, basically every great in the history of football and even the young Cristiano himself who I initially preferred over Messi (was pretty young back then and liked the flashy stuff he did back then).
And I am not making these things up.
https://spielverlagerung.com/2015/06/22/an-ineffective-tool/
This is from 2015 from a German tactical blog. Obviously, the PL came a long way since then and strong offensive teams like City and Liverpool do not play like this any longer. Other countries made this change quite some time ago and it is one of the reasons why the English football used to be so much behind since Guardiola's first CL title.
The transition from 4-4-2 to 4-2-3-1 to a defensiv 4-4-2 and nowadays often a 3-4-3 as well as constructions like inverted wingers, false nines and so on all had the purpose of overloading the midfield to create numerical superiority in the center. This means less space which means that close ball control (dribbling), passing ability and agility become more and more important. And that you can take less shots from a distance.
What I want to say: Crosses, at least in their "traditional definition" are useless and pretty much every modern coach will agree.
Messi does look good, just not very effective at the highest level.Cal is trying
Funny, Messi doesn´t look good, does he??
Messi does look good, just not very effective at the highest level.
Yes, Barcelona should sell him.Messi does look good, just not very effective at the highest level.
Also, Ronaldo used to be one of the best dribbler in the world when he was at United, and during his early Madrid career. Most people have got short memory here.
Messi does look good, just not very effective at the highest level.
I've got to admit I prefer Ronaldo myself but not to the point of putting Messi down. He is a genius there's no two ways about it. Comments like those I have bolded are one of the reasons why people often don't take much of what you say seriously.Messi does look good, just not very effective at the highest level.
It's already been posted before, Messi has a better record in El Clasicos, pretending not to know and "asking for the stats" is not going to work.Anyone has the stats in the match they played against, that should tell us something.
Still the 2nd best in the world...Yes, Barcelona should sell him.
I happen to rate scoring as the most important factor in football.
You list of "every great" in football left out a lot of names, Di Stefano? Beckenbauer? Puskas? Van Basten? None of them are famous for dribbling. Also I'd argue Cristiano is a better dribbler than half the people on your list.
It's true that Messi's record doesn't measure up to Ronaldo's in the CL (especially the latter stage). I'm not twisting facts.I've got to admit I prefer Ronaldo myself but not to the point of putting Messi down. He is a genius there's no two ways about it. Comments like those I have bolded are one of the reasons why people often don't take much of what you say seriously.
Telling a lie a thousand times doesn´t make it true, he has four ECL.Messi is probably more naturally gifted but, as of today, Ronaldo has had the more impressive career -
1. 4 ECLs to 3 (with 2 clubs)
2. Won an international tournament (with a less talented group of players than Argentina)
3. Proved he can thrive on adversity in a very different football culture (particularly 2006/2007).
That he does, even though he played no part whatsoever in 2006 from the QF onwards.wro
Telling a lie a thousand times doesn´t make it true, he has four ECL.
whatever, he has four.That he does, even though he played no part whatsoever in 2006 from the QF onwards.
Be true to oneself Cal. Never mind what other people say. Stick to making your points about Ronaldo instead of trying to put Messi down.It's true that Messi's record doesn't measure up to Ronaldo's in the CL (especially the latter stage). I'm not twisting facts.
It's funny how you decided to jump on that comment when the Messi brigade have been going on about Luiz Ronaldo and Ronaldinho.
He does have 4, 1 of which he did little more than David May in 1999..whatever, he has four.
He did more than Cristiano in the Euro final.He does have 4, 1 of which he did little more than David May in 1999..
Err... Cristiano played in the final.He did more than Cristiano in the Euro final.
Telling a lie a thousand times doesn´t make it true, he has four ECL.
Okay. What about when he looked good against Man United in those finals? Or when he put 4 past Arsenal. Or the 6 goals including a hat trick v Man City?
If Messi played in England he would be by far the best player in the league. FFS, look at the success Salah is having and he isn't even half the player.
Last time I checked nobody was bragging about it, he has four despite he didn´t play semis and final, Ronaldo almost didn´t play the Euro final and people here are bragging that he made Portugal champ. Strange.He has three plus one with an asterisk. I doubt Gerard Pique brags about winning it in 2008.
I believe the opinion that Ronaldo is better than Messi is only found here and at Real. If it was antoher forum it would be an unpopular opinion. Also, wtf is up with that poll? Please change it back as it's ridiculously disrespectful to the GOAT.
I believe the opinion that Ronaldo is better than Messi is only found here and at Real. If it was antoher forum it would be an unpopular opinion. Also, wtf is up with that poll? Please change it back as it's ridiculously disrespectful to the GOAT.
Yup, I don't see Barcelona beating Mourinho's Chelsea without Messi's performance back in 2006. Forced a red card in that game as well.Last time I checked nobody was bragging about it, he has four despite he didn´t play semis and final, Ronaldo almost didn´t play the Euro final and people here are bragging that he made Portugal champ. Strange.
It’s not disrespectful to Ronaldo at all what are you on about?!
Messi is probably more naturally gifted but, as of today, Ronaldo has had the more impressive career -
1. 4 ECLs to 3 (with 2 clubs)
2. Won an international tournament (with a less talented group of players than Argentina)
3. Proved he can thrive on adversity in a very different football culture (particularly 2006/2007).
or QFLast time I checked nobody was bragging about it, he has four despite he didn´t play semis and final, Ronaldo almost didn´t play the Euro final and people here are bragging that he made Portugal champ. Strange.
Don't be silly, I know it's sad that Messi had 74% of the vote at one point on a United forum, but the majority of the world sees Messi as the better player there is no need to be so petty about it
The same Higuain who scored the only goal of the game against Belgium? Ok...4 ecl to 3? what the hell, did 2006 not happen? If that's the case then we remove Ronaldo's euro since he didn't play in the final.
And Messi can't thrive on adversity? Put Messi in the 2008 United team and he'd have United walking the league, I love how people make it sound like Ronaldo playing for two of the richest clubs in the world was overcoming adversity.
And Portugal won a Euro final without him, Argentina struggle to win a single game without Messi let alone an NT final. Messi's team is actually worse than Ronaldo, Ronaldo has the better manager and defense, and has players like Eder actually show up whereas Messi has Higuain bottling chance after chance.
You said ‘is’ not ‘was’ about Ronaldo being a good dribbler.Right, so we're using their dribbling ability at 33 to compare, half of the people on @Zehner 's list had already retired.
This thread is awesome, don’t be sillyThe worst thread in the history of the internet deserves it.