I see a lot of words and rhetoric, but actually quite a small part of this post talks about football, and only about what you want to talk about.
Ok for one in that era where you say Ronaldo was better was in the same era as arguably the greatest team or one of the greatest teams of all time along with Pep Guardiola. All those players were in their prime and were far superior to Madrid. Secondly you claim a few years ago they were basically even in goals in the KO round in a time where Messi had a far superior team!
Was Messi so good in stats because Barcelona had the best team, or had we the best team because Messi played there?
Pep Guardiola, look at his continental success with Bayern and City, not a shadow of what he achieved in Barcelona and Bayern were no slouch, he took a team that won the treble, improved the roster, and never managed to reach a UCL final with them, Messi single-handedly destroyed his team in 10 minutes on his way to the 2nd treble.
Maybe it was easier for Xavi, Iniesta and Guardiola to win titles with Messi in his team, am I crazy for thinking that?
Who were at Real Madrid in that era? Mourinho, regarded as the best coach of the 21st century, Casillas, Ramos, Albiol, Arbeloa, Xabi Alonso, Khedira, Ozil (world cup winners), legends like Pepe, Di Maria, Carvalho, Marcelo, Higuain, Benzema...
You're talking like they were vastly inferior, they fought Barcelona tooth and nail, and some times it was Messi the one who edged Barcelona for the win, not Xavi or Iniesta's fault.
Now Ronaldo still does not have the better team as evidence by Barcelona steam rolling the league yet he is significantly better in the grandest stage of the CL.
You mean the guys that can't be arsed to care about the league when they win one?, that Kroos, Modric, Marcelo, Carvajal, Ramos or Bale can't hold a candle to Xavi, Iniesta, Pique, Abidal, Alves or Villa?.
Maybe if he was "clutch" 30 times a year, instead of 10, his team would have more leagues than Barcelona at this point?, or they wouldn't be 15 points behind, because as far as I know, the same guys that have won 3 of the last 4 UCL, are the ones that play in the league, you can't be serious that he's the GOAT because he shines in the Champions League and then checks out on the league.
If you use the UCL performances to rate who's the best player overall, then you can't back out and say "they're the best team because they win the league" when a team wins 3 UCL titles in 4 years, it doesn't work that way, either you're the best, or you're not the best and just scapegoating.
Has Messi won back to back CL even when he has one of the best teams ever? Nope
Has Messi won a Major trophy for Argentina? Nope
If you believe Messi is better fair play everyone gets an opinion but to say Ronaldo isn't in the same room as Messi is utterly Ridiculous considering Messi has been competing level to level with him his whole career and not blowing him away.
How many back to back CL has Messi? The same amount of trebles Ronaldo has, I can't see how that turns the balance in one way or the other
Has Messi won a major trophy for Argentina? No, but he led them to 3 international finals, Ronaldo lead Portugal to one and barely played the final, the reason he's better is because Eder scored what Higuain failed? Again, I can't seem to know how this turns the table in favor of Ronaldo.
Or the fact that Ronaldo morphed his game 3x to continuously get even better then before almost as if he is evolving, Does that not count?
Ronaldo morphed three times? Well, same as the Argentinian guy here, from wing player, to false 9, and now to a more classic "10", both of them have shown to be smart enough to adapt their play to what the team needs from them.
Its not just the goals Ronaldo IS NOT just goals and who says that does not know football AND even then you are saying that Messi is in the GOAT talk because he contributes in midfield great well last time I checked Goals win games CLUTCH goals win games. The bigger the occasion the better Ronaldo plays. Does that not count as well?
Clutch goals? Bigger occasion? It's a 10 season rivalry, they have claims to be superior to eachother in any number of games, where was Ronaldo in the 2009 UCL final? Where was he in the 2011 semis? Messi beat Ronaldo, same way Ronnie beat Messi in the 2011 Cup final or other bunch of times in the league or Super Cup, they're both clutch players, and known to rise in the bigger stage, again, how do you rate them here, who did it most times? Who has done it most recently?. That's arbitrary if you're comparing their whole careers.
All I see is Messi fans try to downgrade Ronaldo when comparing him to Messi saying oh he only scores ( though he has almost the same assists as Messi career wise) or that he does not impact the game in any other way and its truly baffling.
I'm not the one downgrading Ronaldo, I'm calling a spade a spade, been doing it for years, even "defended" him in his thread months ago saying that he did more than just score for Real Madrid, he's a smart player, he plays his game to perfection and his seemingly "lackluster" goals sometimes come from a lot of off the ball smarts and work.
But for me, that's not enough to bring him over Messi, because Leo has shown that he can be lethal and smart at the space too if he has the luxury of not being involved in the build up. And he has more dimensions to his game than Ronaldo.
Leo is that good
because he's better than Ronaldo, is not that Ronaldo
is not that good because he's not Leo Messi, get what I mean
Lastly if Ronaldo has quit his country after missing an important penalty for them the same way Messi did Ronaldo would be shunned and ridiculed but since its Messi its ok. What Messi did was one of the softest things I have seen for someone who people claim to be head and shoulders better then Messi.
Because, again, it's not as simple as you're trying to sell us.
Messi was criticized in Argentina for years (pecho frio, you know about that?) because he simply couldn't replicate his Barcelona level with Argentina, they expected the guy who scored 73 goals in 60 games
(let those numbers sink in your head) to put on the albiceleste and do the same, if he scored 200 games in four seasons, why was he scoring 11 in 4 years for them?.
So, the inquisition started, Portugal don't have a Maradona to compare Cristiano to, you have Eusebio, while one of the greatest, not a deity status like Diego has in Argentina, and a lot of journalists in Argentina literally get money for praising Diego, so to keep Maradona in heaven, they had to bash Messi, "Mercenario", "Pecho Frio", "Go back to Barcelona", "Can't tie Diego's shoes" and all that kind of beautiful things were said to him for years.
Until the Copa America happened, and he got enough of being hated on when he was already puting his career at risk to play for Argentina (from 2013 to 2016 most of his injuries were related to the amount of games he had to play, focusing on the World Cup and the Copa) and tried to finish with all that drama, what's there for a guy like him to play for a country that doesn't value you because you're not a drug-addict, drunken, women beater that "happened" to win a World Cup?.
You're going to sell me that Cristiano "I'm sad" Ronaldo, the guy who has argued against his own fanbase in Madrid and that wasn't happy about not being the best paid player in the world two months ago, would't send Portugal to hell if half the country was saying he doesn't want to play with Portugal, and that he'd never be half the player Eusebio was?.
Sorry, I don't buy it. If there's something where Ronaldo beats Messi by a long mile is in his desire to be appreciated, he wouldn't take not even an inch less of the abuse that Messi took from Argentina in his career