phelans shorts
Full Member
Never out
I'm confused...didn't the review say it was hitting..so why's he not out?
I'm confused...didn't the review say it was hitting..so why's he not out?
I'm confused...didn't the review say it was hitting..so why's he not out?
I'm confused...didn't the review say it was hitting..so why's he not out?
It was wrong, it clearly showed the ball missing.
If your watching on Sky, they said the graphic was wrong. The original decision was not-out and as the ball was only clipping leg stump and not 'fully' hitting it, the decision stays as the on-field umpire called it - ie. not out.
Isn't it because Hawkeye isn't 100% accurate, so they give benefit of the doubt to the umpire's original decision
samabachan said:The decision was so marginal that it falls within the statictical margin for error on hawkeye, and therefore the benefit of the doubt is given to the umpire's decision either way.
England are batting the game away from the Aussies right now.
Australia bowling quite horribly..
not sure England were that comfortable at 4/197...it was a good recovery by Bell and Cook from their 4/125.