- Joined
- Oct 8, 2023
- Messages
- 19
- Supports
- United
Enough deutch things.
When I watched Juve for Arthur
Same narrative. A coaching genius let down by the squad. I am not that convinced Ajax were as great as sum, one good run in CL with some very good players. they were a giant in a tiny league. look at how the likes of Antony have fared in the Premier league. He's been here 18 months, spent£400m and still were saying he doesnt have right tools. Really?Exactly. Only reasons I can think of is
1. Bruno and Rashford
2. Lack of squad depth
In conjunction with our horrible preseason and 1st PL match, it was bitterly disappointing to hear and set us up for where we are right now.
He's like Lindelof in the sense that, for me, he's too passive defensively. I haven't watched him for Bayern but when I did at Ajax or especially Juve, he came across too mild and weak. The PL would eat him alive.You claim to have watched de Ligt and then claim he would be like Lindelof. Something tells me you didnt actually watch him because de Ligt is totally different to Lindelof. He is way more Maguire than Lindelof.
No more Dutch players and managers please
Same narrative. A coaching genius let down by the squad. I am not that convinced Ajax were as great as sum, one good run in CL with some very good players. they were a giant in a tiny league. look at how the likes of Antony have fared in the Premier league. He's been here 18 months, spent£400m and still were saying he doesnt have right tools. Really?
I am sure they did as lots of people say that. But most of that was in a league of absolute minnows, unlike Barcelona. I agree for a long time Ajax was extremely well run. I think the mistake as you imply was to assume that ETH could work outside that support. He seems utterly lostAjax played some very good football. The question is how much was the institution and how much was Ten Hag's coaching. In general, I think clubs like Ajax or Barca which are so deeply associated with a certain brand of football will always play that way to an extent and every coach there will have to adapt to that. Right now, I have the feeling that Ten Hag decided to adapt his philosophy to the culture at United and isn't really as associated with a style as we assumed when Ajax had this amazing UCL run.
Prime Bailly could've held his own for a few seconds before pulling up injured.There arent any centerbacks that are faster than Mbappe, its all about positioning, something I have no doubt you know very well.
I agree with most of your views on De Ligt's time at Juve. What struck me was how much better the likes of Chiellini and Bonucci looked defensively. He was also error prone. I guess ball playing defenders are plentiful these days which makes him even less unique. I haven't seen his defensive work at Bayern to make any comments on his improvements though.He's like Lindelof in the sense that, for me, he's too passive defensively. I haven't watched him for Bayern but when I did at Ajax or especially Juve, he came across too mild and weak. The PL would eat him alive.
Oh sure you're spot on there. Mentality should come above everything really. Its been such a weak spot in our recruitment since SAF.I'd put professionalism/discipline and work ethic over physical dominance. Latter ain't gonna mean anything if you buy a lazy entitled player, we've been stung too many times.
Dutch you mean?Enough deutch things.
We're definitely in the same boat. Plus, you have to look at who he'd be partnering if he were to join. I like Martinez, and he's not afraid to get stuck in, but his size alongside a timid CB in de Ligt (alongside Onana not being that imposing himself) would leave us way too vulnerable. At least with other smaller CBs we've had in the past decade or so like Blind and Lindelof, we've partnered them with physically imposing defenders in Smalling and Maguire.I agree with most of your views on De Ligt's time at Juve. What struck me was how much better the likes of Chiellini and Bonucci looked defensively. He was also error prone. I guess ball playing defenders are plentiful these days which makes him even less unique. I haven't seen his defensive work at Bayern to make any comments on his improvements though.
I'd take him for his aerials and long term Maguire replacement. I think he's clearly better than most of our CBs. He wouldnt be the only CB I'd bring in, moving others out as well though. Varane, Evans and Lindelof can all make way for better CBs without much fuss
He’s the most obvious signing possible for us.
We don’t need to keep Lindelof. We already have Willy Kambwala who is much much more ideal option than Lindelof.I follow the same logic but Lindelof would be the one I keep because he is the one that I expect to handle being a bench option better. In an ideal world Varane, Evans and Maguire are sold/freed while two youngish CB replace them. Now the identity of these two CBs depends on the price tag because in my opinion, we have a far bigger need for a starting CM and a top level wide player.
We don’t need to keep Lindelof. We already have Willy Kambwala who is much much more ideal option than Lindelof.
Wow, not jumping the gun at all there, are we?We don’t need to keep Lindelof. We already have Willy Kambwala who is much much more ideal option than Lindelof.
Not as a fourth option, he is ideal as the fifth or maybe 6th option. We are talking about someone that has played 92 minutes at senior level, he could easily not be good enough to even be on our bench.
I don’t know what is your expectation of 4th choice centre back but my expectation is that 4th choice centre back shouldn’t be playing regularly and maximum is 540 minutes (equivalent to 6 starts) in the league and getting the chances to play in cup games. I don’t see the risk here especially without champions league football if we go as per the idea of signing two centre backs that means we will have 3 centre backs ahead of him who are likely above his level in term of experienced and potentially ability. He had shown good promising when he was trusted by starting and performed well in the game vs West Ham away, which was a high level opposition.
The risk is that you are putting all your eggs on someone that has zero experience at senior level and could easily be a dud. You are also doing that while making sure that your team can't sustain injuries, fatigue or poor form and all that for no reason.
Very boring indeedHow about we appoint a proper DOF and HOR and let them decide who we should be targeting? The manager chasing after his former players routine is getting very boring now.
The risk is that you are putting all your eggs on someone that has zero experience at senior level and could easily be a dud. You are also doing that while making sure that your team can't sustain injuries, fatigue or poor form and all that for no reason.
Agreed we definitely need two CBs. Most importantly PL type defenders. Arsenal, Liverpool and City have the exact type of CB pairings needed to be successful in the PL.I follow the same logic but Lindelof would be the one I keep because he is the one that I expect to handle being a bench option better. In an ideal world Varane, Evans and Maguire are sold/freed while two youngish CB replace them. Now the identity of these two CBs depends on the price tag because in my opinion, we have a far bigger need for a starting CM and a top level wide player.
My expectation in our first and second choice CB should be capable to play 30 league games so I expect no injury prone, if injury prone then we shouldn’t sign the player. If there is unfortunate injury the 3rd choice to step in or it’s an opportunity for Willy to step up and show what he can do.
This is where IMO we need to make the decision whether we keep him as 4th choice or sell. He‘s going to be 20 years old next season, if he can’t even make it to 4th choice centre back at 20 then I will question his potential.