We manage to bottle a deal which was won by the bottlers
Mathys Tel | on his way to SPURS. He’s going to Spurs lads. SPURS
- Thread starter Bojan Djordjic
- Start date
- Status
We werent as desperate as spurs. A straight loan is only good for bayern
Would you have been happy with just a loan?
Who changed the thread title into that of all things? 'fess up! 
With wages it would be £8m all in
Which is disingenuous, as it isn’t the fee itself and it’s something we all moan about when done to United. If it’s 5m it’s 5m, no need to sensationalise.
I wasn't really sold on this potential one anyway. I don't think throwing in another unproven, young player would be a great idea right now. We need/needed someone who is more experienced and who is going to bring goals. The squad seems to be unbalanced with lots of younger players who are still learning their trade, e.g. Hojlund, Zirkzee, Yoro, Amad, Garnacho, Mainoo, Collyer, etc. We need an older player in this particular role.
Doesn't look like we're going to get that person right now anyway, but I'd rather save the money now for later, instead of potentially adding another problem or headache to the side.
Doesn't look like we're going to get that person right now anyway, but I'd rather save the money now for later, instead of potentially adding another problem or headache to the side.
Better play our own prospects than someone elses. Loan only + fee? Bayern can feck off. He is not proven anyeay, not even a CF we need. Having only two not developed CFs for the rest f the season is grim.
Nah, even if United paid 100% of his wages, Tel is reportedly on ~£79.600/wk, that's not gonna add another 3m on top.
Funny how when we loan our players WE pay to play for other clubs. NO loan fee. A joke
So his league debut will be against Manchester United next gameweek. Knowing our luck, we know where he's getting his first goal of the season.
I'm happy we didn't pay the £5m for a 19 year old with no option to buy. That's a fecking terrible deal. Feck bayern and feck Spurs.
Ts reported it as being £6.6m loan fee i think.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...CDwQAQ&sqi=2&usg=AOvVaw2K-48WPGTMtQiApsWZ-ZPh
If true then they will be paying 8m for his services in total, sounds a lot to me.
Not paying that ridiculous loan fee was the right thing to do.
Our structure is broken in term of salary vs performance. Others are rightly so not going to pay unless they benefit? It's not like we have an over abundance of talents fighting for the spots and need to go on loan. We loan out mostly problem players on ridiculous wages.
Ah you meant Spurs' fee. United is rumoured to have only been asked for 5m. My bad, I misunderstood.
paying 60 mil for Yoro was ridiculous too but INEOS still greenlit that
Signing one of the most talented players in his position wasn't ridiculous at all.
Still yet to see any evidence of this to be fair
It kind of was, when you can't afford it
Doesn't really matter, if you can't see it. Madrid quite clearly saw it for example.
We needed 2 CBs last summer, signing a very talented one was sensible.
- Status