Matheus Cunha £62.5m release clause

You're using such specific parameters here it's impossible.

But on the flip side you used Solanke. His team are 16th, having an awful season. The debate here was players improving when they move to a better team.
I used Solanke as an example because he moved from a team that finished 12th with 1.4 goals per game to a team who are 16th but score 1.84 goals per game. Spurs are a terrible team on the whole, but as an attacking side they're significantly better than Bournemouth were last season.
 
I do worry about Bruno playing CM for us permanently. Yes, you get an edge with his passing but Bruno lacks any dribbling or press resistance in that position. We also lose athleticism in the midfield as well. We need more robustness in the middle of the pitch and Bruno there doesn't help us.

I would prefer for us to target an athletic 8, be that Ederson or someone else and play Bruno there occasionally or switch him there later on in games.
I would have agreed with you towards the beginning one the season but in the second half of the season Bruno has suddenly turned on his press resistance and dribbling. He used to want to received the ball and immediately flick it on, turn the man for a 1-2. However now he’s taking it on the half turn and progressing the ball himself.

I do agree I would rather a spine of two absolute work horses with Ugarte and someone else. But Bruno could easily begin his later stage evolution to more of a dictating midfielder coupled with an incredible work rate.
 
If we do not have European football next season all players lose 25% of their basic pay, just like no CL this season, Rashford actual wages are £250,000 and Villa are paying most of that for 6 months,

Next year Rashford would be looking for a new 4 year contract and a team like Barcelona or PSG will be happy to pay a £40-50m fee plus a 3/4 year contract at €15m per season, we won’t be paying no pay off, he’ll be told find a club or rot in the reserves and with it being a World Cup year he’ll leave!
I would bet my life that PSG and Barcelona are not remotely interested in signing him. Leaving aside the many flaws that mean we don't want him, PSG have a style of play that he simply does not fit and Barcelona are still broke and in no need of another left sided attacker. If Villa don't take up the option to sign him, or more likely if he turns them down, I expect he will be back here for the summer and then out on a subsidised loan again at the end of the window.
 
The team can’t score! so I’d like every new arrival this summer to be someone who at least adds a few goals.

No one player can do it alone, but adding Cunha should add 10-15 goals, which is a step in the right direction.
 
Not true.
He averaged a goal every 85 minutes as a substitute vs 160 minutes as a starter. Sorry but this is all a bit daft now. I feel like you're just disagreeing because you don't want to be seen to be wrong.
 
If we do not have European football next season all players lose 25% of their basic pay, just like no CL this season, Rashford actual wages are £250,000 and Villa are paying most of that for 6 months,

Next year Rashford would be looking for a new 4 year contract and a team like Barcelona or PSG will be happy to pay a £40-50m fee plus a 3/4 year contract at €15m per season, we won’t be paying no pay off, he’ll be told find a club or rot in the reserves and with it being a World Cup year he’ll leave!
Barcelona have major financial issues again this summer. La Liga won't let them register anymore players this summer. They are going to have to sell just to balance the finances to appease La Liga.

Also why would an outfit as slick as Enrique's PSG be interested in rashford. They have Kvaratskhelia playing left wing and he's a different league to rashford as a player. Dembele is the no9 who is on course for making the balon dor top three this year.

I don't think the market for rashford exists that his Entourage probably believe does.
 
So far I've read:

- he doesn't score enough goals (despite scoring more non penalty goals per 90 than Salah).
- he's a tool (despite nobody here knowing him, anything about his life or in fact, anything about him at all).
- various claims about how he plays not suiting us, despite none of these thing being anything like the way he actually plays (and also the fact he literally plays in the same formation that Amorim plays).
- 62.5m being too much for him despite him signing for Wolves for 45m and doing exceptional since he signed there.

Are people not sick to the back teeth of being so negative? Not least inventing things to be negative about. It's brutal reading.
 
People still fretting about that fecking meme stat :lol:

He has at least decent numbers for all of tackles, interceptions, blocks, clearances, ball recoveries. Elite shot creation from defensive actions. In the last month alone he's scored at least a couple purely from his own defensive work:


But nah, he might walk 3% more than some other players, so he's literally Mbappe defensively.
 
He is underrated going by this thread.

Cunha has 37 goal contributions playing as an attacking midfielder over the last 2 seasons. Two very mediocre strikers have gotten double digit goals playing alongside him during the same period. People should be happy United are ging for a PL proven forward which hasn't happened since 2017.
I must be honest, I cant back up my opinion. It's just my obversation watching him play.
 
Fat boy, needs to lose some weight !
He has a ball under his shirt in that photo, which gives the impression of excess weight. He's however quite lean in other pictures.
 
As long as it doesn’t hinder our ability to sign a good striker, I’m all for it. I wouldn’t want it to force us to go for Delap over Gyokeres though for example.
That will happen if we don't win Europa anyway. Fully expect us to still get this guy whether we win it or not. Just means we will have to look for shrewd deals without winning that's all.
 
People still fretting about that fecking meme stat :lol:

He has at least decent numbers for all of tackles, interceptions, blocks, clearances, ball recoveries. Elite shot creation from defensive actions. In the last month alone he's scored at least a couple purely from his own defensive work:

But nah, he might walk 3% more than some other players, so he's literally Mbappe defensively.
Also, number two on that list has literally been one of the best players in the league, if not the world, for the past five years. Shows how significant it is.
 
When did that come to light?
It was reported when he signed for Chelsea that he chose them as he didn’t want to be played as a wingback. It might be a load of rubbish, but I wouldn’t blame him as I wouldn’t want to play as a wingback back either if I had his talent.
 


This is why he overperforms his xG, he scores from long range a lot. But seems a genuine threat from further positions.


We really need a player who can hit them from afar. I like that some of his goals are from outside the box.

Bar Bruno, and Lisandro, when rarely set up to shoot, we don't have a player anymore who can cause such harm to teams that are sitting in deep. If we want to be a force again, we will have a lot of teams that will play in a bank of 5 at the back. Casemiro, 2 seasons ago was chipping in with some long-range strikes, but he no longer has that in him, same with Ericksen.
 
Another Onana scenario? What does that mean and what's it based on?
A player who looked very good in another team, looked like he will elevate the team higher in playing style, comes in at almost peak age and for big money then you know what happened with Onana.

We need a 'Dan James' player rather than Cunha player now in my own opinion.
A Mane player in cost and abilities rather than a VvD in cost.
We will blow up our money on a player who is mostly needed when the project is near completion rather than when starting a project.
 
You do realise wolves signed him for 45mil and he's been a tremendous success for them?

So on what planet would they sell him for the same amount they bought him for?
That's on Wolves. Not on us. If Wolves were scammed or not it's for them to decide.

United should be wary from their own stand. We've seen Sancho, Joao Felix,Di Maria come to EPL and completely stink the place.
We should be extremely cautious.
 
You’re basing this on what, that he has a bit of a temper?
It didn’t harm Cantona, Rooney or Keane at United.
No from seeing what a Wolves fan had to say about him which matches what I've seen. He's not a bad person but he's a me person and doesn't always work for the team. It took a lot for Pereira to bring him around. Also, he's very susceptible to criticism and in the powder keg that's Man Utd it's just a ticking time bomb.

He'd be better served for his career by moving to a big club with less scrutiny i.e no Man Utd, Barcelona, Real Madrid or Bayern.
 
That's on Wolves. Not on us. If Wolves were scammed or not it's for them to decide.

United should be wary from their own stand. We've seen Sancho, Joao Felix,Di Maria come to EPL and completely stink the place.
We should be extremely cautious.
We are being cautious, by looking at a player who's been in the league for a couple of seasons already
 


This is why he overperforms his xG, he scores from long range a lot. But seems a genuine threat from further positions.


Yep.

So the question then is is he a KDB-like player who can consistently outperform xG when it comes to long range efforts? And if so, why was he a net underperformer up until this season?

The most likely answer is that he isn't a KDB, and he is instead just a player having a particularly hot season with strikes from distance. In which case if we're buying him, we need to be happy with what he'll produce if he reverts to finishing to par.
 
I mean, he's clearly a good player and would improve us. I have no idea what kind of budget we're working with but 60-odd million sounds like too much to spend when we desperately need at least 3 more first team additions.

If we can afford it and we're convinced he's not a numpty? Why not. But you can sign me up to team Skeptical on this one.
 
That's on Wolves. Not on us. If Wolves were scammed or not it's for them to decide.

United should be wary from their own stand. We've seen Sancho, Joao Felix,Di Maria come to EPL and completely stink the place.
We should be extremely cautious.
Why are you using examples of players who've come from other leagues and struggled in the EPL as reasons for being cautious regarding Cunha, who is already playing in the EPL and doing rather well? Where's the logic?
 
That's on Wolves. Not on us. If Wolves were scammed or not it's for them to decide.

United should be wary from their own stand. We've seen Sancho, Joao Felix,Di Maria come to EPL and completely stink the place.
We should be extremely cautious.
Huh? Sancho, Felix and Di Maria came from other leagues and had never played in the premier league before, seems odd to compare them to Cunha, who has performed very well in the premier league for the past 2 years.

Also, I think it is safe to say Wolves certainly won’t feel ‘scammed’ by a transfer for a player that has worked out very well for them and they will make a profit on.
 
Why are you using examples of players who've come from other leagues and struggled in the EPL as reasons for being cautious regarding Cunha, who is already playing in the EPL and doing rather well? Where's the logic?
We have been burned by bad experiences
 
We are being cautious, by looking at a player who's been in the league for a couple of seasons already
I understand, he's played in EPL already, but playing EPL and playing for us now is 2 different things.
We are so bad we can swallow him alive. For a considerable fee yes, we can get him
 
He's never worth 62.5m, would be a crazy signing. He's massively over performing his xG this year and should have 7 goals.

If you paid 20-30m it might be worth the risk.
 
Another Onana scenario? What does that mean and what's it based on?

Pretty obvious no? Hes going to be awful between the sticks, drop a bunch of clangers that cost us games and not be anything like the player we saw in the CL final.
 
He's never worth 62.5m, would be a crazy signing. He's massively over performing his xG this year and should have 7 goals.

If you paid 20-30m it might be worth the risk.
Who says he should be on 7 goals? Maybe we should have told him to miss a few more shots in order to not rock the boat.

Why would Wolves sell him at a loss, when he's proved to be a massive success for the £40-45m they spent on him?
 
That will happen if we don't win Europa anyway. Fully expect us to still get this guy whether we win it or not. Just means we will have to look for shrewd deals without winning that's all.
Yeah I’m assuming the noise over Delap is because Gyokeres and Osimhen both said no. I could be wrong though of course.
 
He's never worth 62.5m, would be a crazy signing. He's massively over performing his xG this year and should have 7 goals.

If you paid 20-30m it might be worth the risk.
State of this post. 'Should have 7 goals', the reason he doesn't is because he's a good footballer capable of scoring difficult chances, hence our interest in him
 
A player who looked very good in another team, looked like he will elevate the team higher in playing style, comes in at almost peak age and for big money then you know what happened with Onana.

This myth has been debunked hundred times. Or rather, Onana looked very good at Inter but he wasnt.

We need a 'Dan James' player rather than Cunha player now in my own opinion.
A Mane player in cost and abilities rather than a VvD in cost.
We will blow up our money on a player who is mostly needed when the project is near completion rather than when starting a project.

If you count for inflation, 35mil back then is easily close to 60mil now. Good luck to buy a Mane these days for 35mil.
Adding two more points - questionable character: on previous pages there is a Wolves home and away ST holder for 30 years, and he has only positive comments about Cunhas temperament, work rate, team work etc.

Splashing a big chunk of tight budget on one player when there is so much other summer work with the squad: Wolves have done a number of deals in the past where the buying club would pay very little upfront then instalments over a long period. That would be another benefit to Uniteds struggles with cash flow/PSR.