andersj
Nick Powell Expert
And yet he scored more goals per minute as a sub than as a starter.
You sure about that?
And yet he scored more goals per minute as a sub than as a starter.
I used Solanke as an example because he moved from a team that finished 12th with 1.4 goals per game to a team who are 16th but score 1.84 goals per game. Spurs are a terrible team on the whole, but as an attacking side they're significantly better than Bournemouth were last season.You're using such specific parameters here it's impossible.
But on the flip side you used Solanke. His team are 16th, having an awful season. The debate here was players improving when they move to a better team.
I would have agreed with you towards the beginning one the season but in the second half of the season Bruno has suddenly turned on his press resistance and dribbling. He used to want to received the ball and immediately flick it on, turn the man for a 1-2. However now he’s taking it on the half turn and progressing the ball himself.I do worry about Bruno playing CM for us permanently. Yes, you get an edge with his passing but Bruno lacks any dribbling or press resistance in that position. We also lose athleticism in the midfield as well. We need more robustness in the middle of the pitch and Bruno there doesn't help us.
I would prefer for us to target an athletic 8, be that Ederson or someone else and play Bruno there occasionally or switch him there later on in games.
I would bet my life that PSG and Barcelona are not remotely interested in signing him. Leaving aside the many flaws that mean we don't want him, PSG have a style of play that he simply does not fit and Barcelona are still broke and in no need of another left sided attacker. If Villa don't take up the option to sign him, or more likely if he turns them down, I expect he will be back here for the summer and then out on a subsidised loan again at the end of the window.If we do not have European football next season all players lose 25% of their basic pay, just like no CL this season, Rashford actual wages are £250,000 and Villa are paying most of that for 6 months,
Next year Rashford would be looking for a new 4 year contract and a team like Barcelona or PSG will be happy to pay a £40-50m fee plus a 3/4 year contract at €15m per season, we won’t be paying no pay off, he’ll be told find a club or rot in the reserves and with it being a World Cup year he’ll leave!
He averaged a goal every 85 minutes as a substitute vs 160 minutes as a starter. Sorry but this is all a bit daft now. I feel like you're just disagreeing because you don't want to be seen to be wrong.Not true.
Barcelona have major financial issues again this summer. La Liga won't let them register anymore players this summer. They are going to have to sell just to balance the finances to appease La Liga.If we do not have European football next season all players lose 25% of their basic pay, just like no CL this season, Rashford actual wages are £250,000 and Villa are paying most of that for 6 months,
Next year Rashford would be looking for a new 4 year contract and a team like Barcelona or PSG will be happy to pay a £40-50m fee plus a 3/4 year contract at €15m per season, we won’t be paying no pay off, he’ll be told find a club or rot in the reserves and with it being a World Cup year he’ll leave!
This is concerning.
Yeep.Sounds like an awful lot of money for this guy.
I'd rather spend the money on a proper striker.
Another Onana scenario? What does that mean and what's it based on?Yeep.
45m max.
Another Onana scenario.
You do realise wolves signed him for 45mil and he's been a tremendous success for them?Yeep.
45m max.
Another Onana scenario.
I must be honest, I cant back up my opinion. It's just my obversation watching him play.He is underrated going by this thread.
Cunha has 37 goal contributions playing as an attacking midfielder over the last 2 seasons. Two very mediocre strikers have gotten double digit goals playing alongside him during the same period. People should be happy United are ging for a PL proven forward which hasn't happened since 2017.
Yeep.
45m max.
Another Onana scenario.
Yeah,some people would rather he'd running stats like hojlund. Knowing when to run and running aimlessly,he's impressive and would improve us.Wow we have walking stats now.
He has a ball under his shirt in that photo, which gives the impression of excess weight. He's however quite lean in other pictures.Fat boy, needs to lose some weight !
45 million when Wolves paid that for him? He’s been fantastic for them. Do you really expect them to sell him on with no profit?Yeep.
45m max.
Another Onana scenario.
That will happen if we don't win Europa anyway. Fully expect us to still get this guy whether we win it or not. Just means we will have to look for shrewd deals without winning that's all.As long as it doesn’t hinder our ability to sign a good striker, I’m all for it. I wouldn’t want it to force us to go for Delap over Gyokeres though for example.
Nothing gets past youHe has a ball under his shirt in that photo, which gives the impression of excess weight. He's however quite lean in other pictures.
Also, number two on that list has literally been one of the best players in the league, if not the world, for the past five years. Shows how significant it is.People still fretting about that fecking meme stat
He has at least decent numbers for all of tackles, interceptions, blocks, clearances, ball recoveries. Elite shot creation from defensive actions. In the last month alone he's scored at least a couple purely from his own defensive work:
But nah, he might walk 3% more than some other players, so he's literally Mbappe defensively.
It was reported when he signed for Chelsea that he chose them as he didn’t want to be played as a wingback. It might be a load of rubbish, but I wouldn’t blame him as I wouldn’t want to play as a wingback back either if I had his talent.When did that come to light?
This is why he overperforms his xG, he scores from long range a lot. But seems a genuine threat from further positions.
A player who looked very good in another team, looked like he will elevate the team higher in playing style, comes in at almost peak age and for big money then you know what happened with Onana.Another Onana scenario? What does that mean and what's it based on?
That's on Wolves. Not on us. If Wolves were scammed or not it's for them to decide.You do realise wolves signed him for 45mil and he's been a tremendous success for them?
So on what planet would they sell him for the same amount they bought him for?
No from seeing what a Wolves fan had to say about him which matches what I've seen. He's not a bad person but he's a me person and doesn't always work for the team. It took a lot for Pereira to bring him around. Also, he's very susceptible to criticism and in the powder keg that's Man Utd it's just a ticking time bomb.You’re basing this on what, that he has a bit of a temper?
It didn’t harm Cantona, Rooney or Keane at United.
We are being cautious, by looking at a player who's been in the league for a couple of seasons alreadyThat's on Wolves. Not on us. If Wolves were scammed or not it's for them to decide.
United should be wary from their own stand. We've seen Sancho, Joao Felix,Di Maria come to EPL and completely stink the place.
We should be extremely cautious.
This is why he overperforms his xG, he scores from long range a lot. But seems a genuine threat from further positions.
Why are you using examples of players who've come from other leagues and struggled in the EPL as reasons for being cautious regarding Cunha, who is already playing in the EPL and doing rather well? Where's the logic?That's on Wolves. Not on us. If Wolves were scammed or not it's for them to decide.
United should be wary from their own stand. We've seen Sancho, Joao Felix,Di Maria come to EPL and completely stink the place.
We should be extremely cautious.
Huh? Sancho, Felix and Di Maria came from other leagues and had never played in the premier league before, seems odd to compare them to Cunha, who has performed very well in the premier league for the past 2 years.That's on Wolves. Not on us. If Wolves were scammed or not it's for them to decide.
United should be wary from their own stand. We've seen Sancho, Joao Felix,Di Maria come to EPL and completely stink the place.
We should be extremely cautious.
We have been burned by bad experiencesWhy are you using examples of players who've come from other leagues and struggled in the EPL as reasons for being cautious regarding Cunha, who is already playing in the EPL and doing rather well? Where's the logic?
I understand, he's played in EPL already, but playing EPL and playing for us now is 2 different things.We are being cautious, by looking at a player who's been in the league for a couple of seasons already
Another Onana scenario? What does that mean and what's it based on?
Who says he should be on 7 goals? Maybe we should have told him to miss a few more shots in order to not rock the boat.He's never worth 62.5m, would be a crazy signing. He's massively over performing his xG this year and should have 7 goals.
If you paid 20-30m it might be worth the risk.
Yeah I’m assuming the noise over Delap is because Gyokeres and Osimhen both said no. I could be wrong though of course.That will happen if we don't win Europa anyway. Fully expect us to still get this guy whether we win it or not. Just means we will have to look for shrewd deals without winning that's all.
State of this post. 'Should have 7 goals', the reason he doesn't is because he's a good footballer capable of scoring difficult chances, hence our interest in himHe's never worth 62.5m, would be a crazy signing. He's massively over performing his xG this year and should have 7 goals.
If you paid 20-30m it might be worth the risk.
Adding two more points - questionable character: on previous pages there is a Wolves home and away ST holder for 30 years, and he has only positive comments about Cunhas temperament, work rate, team work etc.A player who looked very good in another team, looked like he will elevate the team higher in playing style, comes in at almost peak age and for big money then you know what happened with Onana.
This myth has been debunked hundred times. Or rather, Onana looked very good at Inter but he wasnt.
We need a 'Dan James' player rather than Cunha player now in my own opinion.
A Mane player in cost and abilities rather than a VvD in cost.
We will blow up our money on a player who is mostly needed when the project is near completion rather than when starting a project.
If you count for inflation, 35mil back then is easily close to 60mil now. Good luck to buy a Mane these days for 35mil.