izec
Full Member
Some team that. They’re gonna be even hard to score against with Rice and Rodri in there. 2 solid DM who cover a lot of ground and not only defend but they can chip in with goals aswell.
They will be going for the quadruple
Some team that. They’re gonna be even hard to score against with Rice and Rodri in there. 2 solid DM who cover a lot of ground and not only defend but they can chip in with goals aswell.
Yeah that and their dubious practices which enable them to pay better wages than most definitely helps!Probably by being the best team in England.
Yeah so no one else has a chance not one club in Europe? Yeah that's it.Probably by being the best team in England.
Yeah so no one else has a chance not one club in Europe? Yeah that's it.
He's a 29-year-old who has yet to establish himself as a starter at a top team. Maybe not that many clubs were interested or didn't match his pretensions.Yeah so no one else has a chance not one club in Europe? Yeah that's it.
He's had a very interesting career
Part of 4 iconic teams in European history: Madrid, Chelsea, City, Croatia
Not the most important player in any midfield but a reliable Swiss army knife player comfortable in and out of possession, takes risks sensibly, off ball movement is decent...
Where does he really rank at the end of the day? How good and important is he? And how dense is Todd Boehly, @WeePat?
It's 4 isn't it?5 Champions Leagues,
Don't talk about it. It's fine.What happened to the other CM City signed? The one from Wolves. He looked like a good player and thought we should've gone for him. But don't think he has featured much for City.
Yep, would’ve been a better fit, all things considered but apparently he only wanted to go to City, so we had no chance to sign him.I remember there were plenty of people on here last summer saying that if we were buying a midfielder from Chelsea it should be this guy, not Mount. They were probably right too.
It's 4 isn't it?
They sign shite like him and let Palmer go for 40m in the same windowDon't talk about it. It's fine.
Even though he cost 60 million euros.
Yep. Was hardly going to transform our side alone, but he has traits that our midfield lacked, and still does.I remember there were plenty of people on here last summer saying that if we were buying a midfielder from Chelsea it should be this guy, not Mount. They were probably right too.
Nunes? He’s an excellent ball carrier but it doesn’t seem like the rest of his game is good enough.What happened to the other CM City signed? The one from Wolves. He looked like a good player and thought we should've gone for him. But don't think he has featured much for City.
....how is Kovacic any different?Nunes? He’s an excellent ball carrier but it doesn’t seem like the rest of his game is good enough.
By being a better player? Nunes’ main strength also being Kovacic’s main strength doesn’t mean they’re the same. Kovacic retains the ball way better. Nunes looks more like wide midfielder playing in midfield. Even at Chelsea Kovacic was a 90+ passing accuracy guy.....how is Kovacic any different?
He may be better but he's also a player with very little going for him besides dribbling...he's more mature than Nunes, I'll give him thatBy being a better player? Nunes’ main strength also being Kovacic’s main strength doesn’t mean they’re the same. Kovacic retains the ball way better. Nunes looks more like wide midfielder playing in midfield. Even at Chelsea Kovacic was a 90+ passing accuracy guy.