Flying high
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2015
- Messages
- 1,979
Trash player. Chelsea have taken us to the cleaners.
I never wanted him and I don't think he's what we need. But trash? Come on.
Trash player. Chelsea have taken us to the cleaners.
Oh yes, because judging a player off of one game in a dysfunctional shit side and environment is definitely going to give you a good conclusion on him, not to mention that the player's been injured almost all season.
And whenever he's played well, I bet my life that none of you posted a single comment into this thread. Same with Hojlund and Onana.
Good players don't become bad overnight. It's so tiring on here these days.
Oh yes, because judging a player off of one game in a dysfunctional shit side and environment is definitely going to give you a good conclusion on him, not to mention that the player's been injured almost all season.
And whenever he's played well, I bet my life that none of you posted a single comment into this thread. Same with Hojlund and Onana. Just wanting your awful takes to be proven wrong more than the player actually succeeding at the club.
Good players don't become bad overnight. It's so tiring on here these days.
I never wanted us to sign him in the first place and I'm not basing that just off his performance tonight, he was terrible for England in the WC and had everyone calling for him to be dropped for Bellingham.Oh yes, because judging a player off of one game in a dysfunctional shit side and environment is definitely going to give you a good conclusion on him, not to mention that the player's been injured almost all season.
And whenever he's played well, I bet my life that none of you posted a single comment into this thread. Same with Hojlund and Onana. Just wanting your awful takes to be proven wrong more than the player actually succeeding at the club.
Good players don't become bad overnight. It's so tiring on here these days.
He is bad now for 2-3 years, not overnight.
He had a purple patch, this is his level.
I’ve watched Mason Mount play 36 times for England & plenty of times for Chelsea. I didn’t need this season to know he wasn’t a particularly good player and was going to be a god awful signing for £60 million. The injuries have just been the icing on this particular shit sandwich.
I never wanted us to sign him in the first place and I'm not basing that just off his performance tonight, he was terrible for England in the WC and had everyone calling for him to be dropped for Bellingham.
No, he's a good player that will do well in a good tactical system, good environment, and good teammates around him. Never judge any player on a nightmare season like this. The first sentence is true for a lot of our players as well, by the way. This squad is far from awful.
A good player whose last good season was what, when Chelsea won the CL? 3 years ago? 2 years ago if we’re being kind? Truth is he’s a decent hardworking squad player who had one standout season and has mostly been average before and since. He’ll follow instructions and work hard but his talent is limited. He’s the Chelsea version of Lingard and we dropped £60 mil on him like complete idiots.
Won’t cost 60, 60 includes crazy bonuses like winning the league. It’ll be 55, which is still way too much.All of us saw this coming. He didn't look anything special at Chelsea and we didn't have a place in our team for him. It's mental that we gave Chelsea 60 million.
Absolutely spot on. He is a grafter but is a bang average player otherwise. He runs around like a headless chicken a lot, but he is never more than a bench player for a team who want to be challenging the best teams.A good player whose last good season was what, when Chelsea won the CL? 3 years ago? 2 years ago if we’re being kind? Truth is he’s a decent hardworking squad player who had one standout season and has mostly been average before and since. He’ll follow instructions and work hard but his talent is limited. He’s the Chelsea version of Lingard and we dropped £60 mil on him like complete idiots.
A good player whose last good season was what, when Chelsea won the CL? 3 years ago? 2 years ago if we’re being kind? Truth is he’s a decent hardworking squad player who had one standout season and has mostly been average before and since. He’ll follow instructions and work hard but his talent is limited. He’s the Chelsea version of Lingard and we dropped £60 mil on him like complete idiots.
That has honestly always been the issue with Mount: mgrs have tried him at RW, AM, deeper as an 8 … he lacks something for each of those.Honestly didn't even realise he was playing. Still don't know what he supposed to be.
He was brought in to lead the press, that's why Klopp and Arteta were after him too, he'd have been much better off going to one of those teams as they both have a coherent pressing approach with players willing and capable.
Lots of people questioned this decision - particularly when it was to be the no.8 (and on a large fee rather than free as a squad option), and when it was clear we were letting Fred go and needed a dynamic combative no.8 who could also progress play, and ideally fill in as 6 when Casemiro or whoever went forward or needed to be dropped - but were told they weren't sophisticated enough to appreciate what Ten Hag was trying to do... Clear he does have a plan (of sorts) and that it's absolutely nonsensical in this league with anything resembling this set of players, even if he changes the profiles of 1 or 2. Even with that plan in mind, bringing in Mount of all people to play in the centre, in the PL of all places, when our CM gets so little help from other quarters normally, especially if 1st choice B and Shaw are not available, is...crazy.A good player whose last good season was what, when Chelsea won the CL? 3 years ago? 2 years ago if we’re being kind? Truth is he’s a decent hardworking squad player who had one standout season and has mostly been average before and since. He’ll follow instructions and work hard but his talent is limited. He’s the Chelsea version of Lingard and we dropped £60 mil on him like complete idiots.
@Rojofiam tell him how wrong he is, like you have with everyone else and it's definitely not you who is wrong.
That has honestly always been the issue with Mount: mgrs have tried him at RW, AM, deeper as an 8 … he lacks something for each of those.
He would be doing very well for those teams, and the narrative on here would be how we "missed out" on Mount
Same if we had got another keeper instead of Onana, and let Hojlund go to PSG.
People can't understand that the tactical system and overall environment is by far the most important thing for a player.
Do they seriously think the likes of Bellingham, Vinícius, Foden, Haaland, Wirtz, etc. (most of the Ballon d'Or contenders) would look anything more than half-decent players at best in this United side? Such an easy and obvious concept but I guess it's better to moan about nonexistent issues.
Let’s at least be fair, it’s close to impossible to shine in this degree of dog poo, it’s actually absolutely outstanding that Bruno sometimes manages to lift his head above the mountain of shite.
I think a lot of folks on here don't understand the scope of the rot that's set in throughout every department in the club. Just look at how often the idea of throwing a new manager, or a youth team player, etc at one of our problems is thrown around under the expectation that it'll fix things.
Mount would look good in a well drilled pressing team with able and willing teammates, he's one of the best off-the-ball players around. Unfortunately to look good at United at the moment players need to be able to make things happen out of nothing, which isn't Mount's game at all.
I'll just put this here, a post when we bought him.He is shite, and we are shite to buy him for 60 mil. in his last year of contract. And Kane was 100 mil.