LawCharltonBest
Enjoys watching porn..with foxes
You think he’s good?I am 100% sure this post is bollocks.
“He has no qualities at all”
You think he’s good?I am 100% sure this post is bollocks.
“He has no qualities at all”
I didn’t realise they actually wanted money. Wtf?
Hottest links so far have been to a CB who plays on the left side, a right back, and now a pseudo no.10/8.
Be careful what you wish for with Ratcliffe thenI genuinely don’t understand this link, I don’t see what he would bring us. I had assumed it was just pre silly season footy gossip bollocks but if Orny is on it then it just became real!
Jeremie Frimpong.Who is the right back?
Agreed midfield balance looks quite off and ideally we should be targeting different profile of midfielder .
But I am certainly not buying the notion of United willing to make opening offer of 55 m for Mount infact one the reason we might be in for Mount is his favourable contract situation . I simply can't see United going beyond 40 m for him with only year left on his contract .
He’s doesn’t excel in areas we desperately lack. He’s not great in tight spaces and is not really a creative passer. He doesn’t help is keep the ball better.
Ten Hag likes dropping Bruno deeper and out wide, instead of signing an 8 to replace Eriksen it opens up Mount for 10 who will add legs and work rate that would help us stop every top 8 side walking through us away from home. We might miss a bit of creativity through Mount but that would be negated by the world class 9/10 hybrid play signing Kane would bring so I’m guessing it’s a big picture signing.Can someone not completely against this potential transfer explain what the possible logic could be in signing him?
You prefer the challenge of a relegation battle? AdmirableWhy would he come to United? I wouldn't.
So there was a theory bandied around, mostly by that Muppetiers account I think, that ETH has kind of switched his setup in the sense of how he wants us to play, which kind of makes sense when you see the difference between this summer and last summer and the kind of midfielders we're reportedly targettingCan someone not completely against this potential transfer explain what the possible logic could be in signing him?
Jeremie Frimpong.
Can someone not completely against this potential transfer explain what the possible logic could be in signing him?
@Bastian I wasn't going to respond but as you've asked, then signing him makes sense imo.Lets be real here. We are buying him to press. Most of our midfield players can't do that to the required level that ETH wants.
Ten Hag likes dropping Bruno deeper and out wide, instead of signing an 8 to replace Eriksen it opens up Mount for 10 who will add legs and work rate that would help us stop every top 8 side walking through us away from home. We might miss a bit of creativity through Mount but that would be negated by the world class 9/10 hybrid play signing Kane would bring so I’m guessing it’s a big picture signing.
He certainly is amazing defensively for the standards of an attacking player but not so much in a two man midfield (possible exception when desperately chasing a game). We've only done it a few times from the start but it's looked horrible when we have and felt like we had a 1 man midfield.Jesus fecking Christ, I have some reservations about this signing but Mount is nowhere near as crap as some of you are making out.
In some ways, if Ten Hag is looking for a more athletic version of Eriksen the signing actually somewhat makes sense. Mount is really good off the ball, and excellent at providing defensive cover. He's not as technically proficient as Eriksen but considering De Jong is off the table, we're either going to need to compromise on a midfielder, not buy one, or spend north of 80 million on someone like Caicedo. (And for the record, I highly doubt Mount will go for anything near the 80 million that Chelsea want)
@Bastian I wasn't going to respond but as you've asked, then signing him makes sense imo.
The likes of Bruno and Fred etc play with a lot of energy but they're easily bypassed by quick and agile players. Mount not only matches the aforementioned two for intensity but is also physically and athletically gifted hence he's stronger in defensive transition and tactically he's a superior player for a team that wants to sacrifice defensive stability for goals. It's why the likes of Liverpool and Arsenal want him, aswell as Tuchel rating him highly. All our forwards with the exception of Antony aren't very intelligent when it comes to defensive duties in defensive transition. And previously the likes of Pogba and Matic were also easily bypassed in midfield. So you can't control games without controlling both what you do in possession and also what you do out of possession. And what you do out of possession isn't very popular amongst some fans but it's absolutely imperative if one wants to implement a proactive attacking brand of football by playing the game in the opponent's half.
Also if we end up signing Harry Kane with him dropping deeper with Mount behind him, it makes more sense for a player with Mounts skillset to be behind him centrally, rather than Bruno imo. Mount is a proper systems player and hence a positional play coach like Tuchel was able to get his ideas across quickly to the player. Mount can also be used as a pressing trigger and is technically good, aswell as tactically clever.
And I hope we can get the deals done quickly because for me the most important positions to target to dominate games is a keeper, CM and RB. And those three positions are key to exerting control in possession and play through the press and raise the defensive line.