L1nk
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2017
- Messages
- 5,194
Who is 30 and only has a year left on his contract, 100 million is obscene even for Harry KaneAre we seriously comparing Mason Mount to one of the best strikers in the world? Come on
Who is 30 and only has a year left on his contract, 100 million is obscene even for Harry KaneAre we seriously comparing Mason Mount to one of the best strikers in the world? Come on
Would rather get JWP.
Mount is miles better than JWP. Pretty convinced Ward-Prowse is the most overrated player in the Premier League today because of how excellent his free kicks are. People assume someone so good at free kicks has to be great at other things but he's really not. He's a lower mid-table PL player and that's it.Got me wrong. Wasn't comparing skillset ot ability. From a team standpoint, JWP fits us more than Mount. He is also home grown.
It's almost as if one of these is amongst the best players of his generation and fits the profile of what we need and the other one is Mason Mount.People moaning about the incredibly high fee for a 24 year old on the last year of his contract are no doubt okay spunking 100 million on a 30 year old on the last year of his contract though.
Play them together. Viva Mount Fred!I don’t really see Fred and Mount as being like for like
The 30 year old is a world-class player who is one of the best in the world at his position. Mount is your run of mill overhyped mediocre English player. Being a slight improvement over a loan signing and a flop is not much of an achievement for a 100mn signing.People moaning about the incredibly high fee for a 24 year old on the last year of his contract are no doubt okay spunking 100 million on a 30 year old on the last year of his contract though.
Mount may not be the best player we could buy, but he's young, would count as homegrown, has qualities, and i'm sorry but he would be a bigger upgrade over DVB, Fred, Sabitzer etc so i'm all for it personally, I still think we would need another midfielder though
People moaning about the incredibly high fee for a 24 year old on the last year of his contract are no doubt okay spunking 100 million on a 30 year old on the last year of his contract though.
Mount may not be the best player we could buy, but he's young, would count as homegrown, has qualities, and i'm sorry but he would be a bigger upgrade over DVB, Fred, Sabitzer etc so i'm all for it personally, I still think we would need another midfielder though
It's almost as if one of these is amongst the best players of his generation and fits the profile of what we need and the other one is Mason Mount.
That's obviously not what my point wasAre we seriously comparing Mason Mount to one of the best strikers in the world? Come on
And yet it will cost us virtually all of our reported summer budget (without sales) for a player who may decline in a couple of years or so and for a player who - on their own - won't get us closer to City, we need more than that.It's almost as if one of these is amongst the best players of his generation and fits the profile of what we need and the other one is Mason Mount.
Mount won't cost 100 million though, and will also have resale value if he doesn't quite work out here, because he's only 24. Kane will have 0 resale value and may go downhill within the next few years, for 100 million, which is all of our reported presale budget.The 30 year old is a world-class player who is one of the best in the world at his position. Mount is your run of mill overhyped mediocre English player. Being a slight improvement over a loan signing and a flop is not much of an achievement for a 100mn signing.
But also, there are plenty of people who don't want either Kane or Mount.It's almost as if one of these is amongst the best players of his generation and fits the profile of what we need and the other one is Mason Mount.
Whether Kane wins us a league title or not he would very obviously move us much closer to City. We have the 2nd highest xG underperformance in the entire league behind only Everton. This is directly linked to our terrible lack of options in the striker position.And yet it will cost us virtually all of our reported summer budget (without sales) for a player who may decline in a couple of years or so and for a player who - on their own - won't get us closer to City, we need more than that.
Would rather sign Maddison who would be cheaper as well. Considering Leicester is most likely to go down.
He’s another injury prone player though that we don’t need. He is class though.Yeah Maddison has a real swagger and think he would love playing here,however see him joining Newcastle. Probably did most of the deal while he was there on Monday
We shouldn't be going near eitherBang average
Wouldn’t work regardless alongside Bruno and Casemiro there’s no balance in midfield.
Would rather go for Maddison if we’re looking for that profile of player.
He grew up as a United fan, so yes, he would love playing here.Yeah Maddison has a real swagger and think he would love playing here,however see him joining Newcastle. Probably did most of the deal while he was there on Monday
Eriksen was a free transfer though, and although our midfield has been much improved our midfield has regularly been overrun against bigger teams. We need a more physical player who can also pass the ball, mount can run but isn't particularly physical and doesn't have a great passing rangeOne thing I would note regarding the idea that Mount wouldn't fit our midfield is that a lot of posters were making the same point regarding Eriksen last summer, arguing that he was someone who would be an alternative to Bruno rather than used alongside him as that midfield would lack balance. Yet it has been our first choice midfield all season.
Mount wouldn't be my idea of the profile we need, but it's not at all impossible that ETH has a different view on what the make-up of the midfield should look like.
That's a fair point - I definitely thought there was no way Eriksen would consistently play CM, given he had only ever done it occasionally before. Although I'd say the fears about imbalance didn't prove to be completely baseless.One thing I would note regarding the idea that Mount wouldn't fit our midfield is that a lot of posters were making the same point regarding Eriksen last summer, arguing that he was someone who would be an alternative to Bruno rather than used alongside him as that midfield would lack balance. Yet it has been our first choice midfield all season.
Mount wouldn't be my idea of the profile we need, but it's not at all impossible that ETH has a different view on what the make-up of the midfield should look like.
He's rubbish
He is shit.
What an utter garbage signing this would be
Hes shite.
He is trash,
Mythical resale value like the one maguire has or the one martial has.That's obviously not what my point was
And yet it will cost us virtually all of our reported summer budget (without sales) for a player who may decline in a couple of years or so and for a player who - on their own - won't get us closer to City, we need more than that.
Mount won't cost 100 million though, and will also have resale value if he doesn't quite work out here, because he's only 24. Kane will have 0 resale value and may go downhill within the next few years, for 100 million, which is all of our reported presale budget.
My point was just that both of them are stupid prices for players on the last year of their contract, but at least with Mount he has time on his side and potential resale value if it doesn't work out. Kane has neither of these if he goes downhill
He's not a good 8 though.He can play 8 and 10. So can play with and without Bruno. Bruno can also occupant the wing.
Well to be fair the Maguire one helps my point a little, anyone and their grandmothers could have told you 80 million for Maguire was daylight robbery. How is anyone ever going to make money back on that?Mythical resale value like the one maguire has or the one martial has.
Bang average
Wouldn’t work regardless alongside Bruno and Casemiro there’s no balance in midfield.
Would rather go for Maddison if we’re looking for that profile of player.
He's not a good 8 though.
Imo it is paper talk. I don’t think any team would be crazy enough to spend 100m on Kane. Maybe 40m-70m(incl pl/cl win bonus).People moaning about the incredibly high fee for a 24 year old on the last year of his contract are no doubt okay spunking 100 million on a 30 year old on the last year of his contract though.
Mount may not be the best player we could buy, but he's young, would count as homegrown, has qualities, and i'm sorry but he would be a bigger upgrade over DVB, Fred, Sabitzer etc so i'm all for it personally, I still think we would need another midfielder though